How International Bankers took back control of the world economy.

The History

Banking has been around long since before Christ kicked over the tables of the money changers, but I will begin with the 20th century.

Great advance in technology created our modern world of electricity and engines. Few of the great men who innovated most of this technology ever became wealthy men themselves, instead to ICBs managed to grab up all the wealth, men like JP Morgan and Rockefeller, who amassed fortune not seen since the time of the pharoahs.

The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was a compromise, which created a federal monetary system without a central bank. It was probably voted in the way it occurred Because there were too many parties looking to create a system of pure corruption. The system in place before the Fed Res was a disaster, and bankers like JP Morgan practically ran the country. It was an improvement, but surely a better system could be put in place.

Things improved for a while, but then fast forward to the twenties, where speculative banking was born again, allowing the creation of trusts, corporations that were purely investment based. Massive fraud took over the stock market, private debt soared, and a great pyramid was built, that then collapsed under its own corrupt structure.

Enter the Great Depression. People had finally wisened up to the true ugly nature of the corporate entity, and elected politicians who wrote laws that once again greatly restricted the legal bounds of corporations, raised taxes on the rich, and put in place laws that protected the rights of workers and consumers. Our schools have succeeded in hiding one of the great truths about the founding of the US, which is that the original colonies were ran by corporations, and the original purpose of our government is to protect us from these types of corporate entities.

The US entered a period of building infrastructure, but the economy continued to flounder, many political divides remained, and the ICBs were ot giving up without a fight. The ICBs continued to manipulate the world economy, creating the massive currency inflation in Germany, and then bringing Hitler to power to break German Unions Thus WWII was created. Massive government spending on the war effort kick started the US economy. The US ended the war victiously, emerging as the world's new super power.

With laws firmly in place restricting corporations, protecting consumers and workers, with strong defense of unions that are critical to the rise of a strong middle class. The US government quickly paid off its debts, even while fighting a war in Korea, rebuilding Europe and Japan, forgiving debts, and continuing to build and expand our nations infrastructure.

The US lived through a period of its greatest prosperity, innovation, cultural expansion in arts, music, and science. We put men on the moon.

Ah, but the ICBs still were hanging around, slowly putting their plans in place to take control once again. Through assassinations and other crooked schemes, they got their man Nixon into the white house. Long term planning enabled the bankers to create their welfare ghettos in the cities (done under Nixon) crime increased to unprecedented levels. The drug culture, spawned by The CIA (controlled by the people who put Hitler in power) put the icing on the cake. This turned the US public against the idea of welfare, stirring up the ani-socialism propaganda. Then came the crowning achievement, the energy crisis, which allowed the bankers to trigger double digit inflation, resulting in the elimination of Usury Laws, which restrict interest rates.

With these crisises put in place by the ICBs themselves, they convinced a new gullible and spoiled public that that laws restricting corporations were the cause of all the problems, along with unions, who then voted in politicians who dismantled the very system that had allowed such great prosperity to exist in the fifties and the sixties.

This is the story of how the ICBs took back control of the world economy.

reply to post by poet1b

reply to post by purplemer


And the institution of slavery is making a come back.

It is amazing how quickly the ICBs have cozied up with communist China.

Two peas in a pod.

reply to post by purplemer


With all due respect and your graphic may be true, but care to back that claim up with any kind of facts? It's just that I'm past believing sensationalist internet virals.

reply to post by michael1983l


I would add, I think Iran and N Korea are both pawns of the ICBs, whether or not they know it, but chances are they do.

The ICBs need boogeymen in order to sell their propaganda, the lies that allow them to continue fooling enough of the people, enough of the time, to stay in control.

Originally posted by michael1983l
reply to post by purplemer

 

With all due respect and your graphic may be true, but care to back that claim up with any kind of facts? It's just that I'm past believing sensationalist internet virals.

With all due repsect back. I really cannot be asked to go and search for information every time someone asks me too. Google is your friend too..

I have looked into myself. Afghanistan never had Rothschild central bank. In the middle of the war they inserted one and changed the currency. Libya the same. As soon as the rebels started fighting they where given there own central bank. I have researched into and I do think there is a truth to it. Otherwise I would not post it. I have come up against some dead ends though. Like the Bank of England. It is a run by a private company and covered by the official secret act..

In a nut shell after 911 a list of countries where named as the axis of evil. Well that very same list is the same list that does not have a Rothschild central banking system. That is no coincidence.

The elites of today are no different than the elites of the past. They want control of everything.

Massive immigration is something the elites have always pursued. At the turn of the 19th century, massive immigration was encouraged for the same reason it is encouraged today, to lower wages and eliminate consumer and workers rights.

Immigration also helps to create conflict and crime. If a certain level of crime exists, people will support more police, more court actions, more jails, and the creation of a police state.

It is amazing how many people claim to support smaller government, but continue to support bigger and bigger police and military expansion by the government.

All of this serves the interests of the ICBs, by keeping the workers too busy scrambling to survive to defend their rights. This allows the corporations to completely strip the wealth away from the middle class, stuck playing the games that tip the odds in favor of the ICBs, in such a manner that Vegas Casinos can only dream.

Originally posted by michael1983l
but care to back that claim up with any kind of facts? .

he cannot, as it is just not true. Australia, New Zealand, the UK and Canada for starters have a state owned Central Bank....

reply to post by hellobruce


Whether it is a state owned, or a private owned banking monetary system, it should be tightly controlled.

When banking becomes the most profitable business form, there is a serious possibility that the system is rigged.

In our current state, the banks essentially own everything. Whether or not you realize it or not, banks control what property you are allowed to purchase, where you can start a business, and what kind of business you are allowed to start.

Elimination of banking regulations have given banks carte blanche, to do what every they want to do in their manipulation of the money supply, which puts them in charge of the world economy, with no liability whatsoever for their actions.

One can only wonder how long they can continue to fool enough of the people to keep this scheme going.

reply to post by purplemer

The US should be on your list. The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve has no one with any familial connections to the Rothschilds.

reply to post by SkepticOverlord


What????

There have been three central banks in the nation's history. The first two, while deceptive and fraudulent, pale in comparison to the scope and size of the fraud being perpetrated by the current FED. What they all have in common is an insidious practice known as"fractional banking." Who owns the FED? The Rothschilds of London and Berlin; Lazard Brothers of Paris; Israel Moses Seif of Italy; Kuhn, Loeb and Warburg of Germany; and the Lehman Brothers, Goldman, Sachs and the Rockefeller families of New York.

Source

Is this not what ATS is all about?

It's a Conspiracy!

You're supposed to be an example here!

Even if the Rothchild family dont own it now, surely it still is a Rothchild central banking system?

reply to post by purplemer

Go purplemer, the hebridies are my favourite place in all the world. I remember the news article 2 weeks after Libya's 'arab spring' where it was mentioned that the rebels had set up a 'new' central bank. They made sure that the video of Gaddaffi getting sodomised and killed got out on utube. Cheeky monkey was only trying to institute the 'gold dinar' as a gold backed pan-african currency. A good friend of mine wrote many letters to our MP asking why we were flying air cover for al-quaeda, but he got no sensible answers. Stinks worse than a herring girl's armpit. But there you go, that's life

reply to post by hellobruce

hello hellobruce, that's why us plebs aren't allowed to know who the BOE shareholders are. They have a veneer of nationalisation, try looking beyond.

reply to post by Theflyingweldsman


You are aware that "Wiki Answers" is rarely a definitive source, right?

Also, that excerpt actually comes from here: www.john-f-kennedy.net... -- which has a great deal of dubious information.

Yes, this is ATS. Yes, ATS deal with conspiracies, among many other things. And yes, ATS also contains opinions of people that don't believe many popularized conspiracies. The bogey-man conspiracy of the Rothschilds controlling the current US Federal reserve is one I've never found substantiating evidence.

Originally posted by freebornman
hello hellobruce, that's why us plebs aren't allowed to know who the BOE shareholders are.

What makes you claim that? We know who the shareholder is....

Friend of a friend

reply to post by purplemer


the Axis of Evil were Iran-Iraq-NK...

Axis of evil is a term initially used by the former United States President George W. Bush in his State of the Union Address on January 29, 2002, and often repeated throughout his presidency, describing governments that he accused of helping terrorism and seeking weapons of mass destruction. Iran, Iraq and North Korea were portrayed by George W. Bush during the State of the Union as building nuclear weapons. The Axis of Evil was used to pinpoint these common enemies of the United States and ally the country in support of the war on terror.

...source Wikipedia


Cuba was not in there as you seem to imply...re the OP mention of Cuba not having a MABUS based & dominated central bank (using the Bauer surname before it was changed to Rothschild... gives us the MAB of 'mabus' fame introduced by Nostradamus no less


just a very important side issue. before the discussion becomes mired in sophistry

While there is evidence of a central web of banking and insurance corporations owning vast portions of the worlds wealth, it is a pretty large web. There is a thread on ATS on the matter. Many of you may be familiar with it.

I think the threat from the ICBs is even more ominous than some central group controlling everything. The corporate entity is such a legal creature, that it has no loyalty to anyone or anything. Even the people who temporarily occupy controlling positions behind the mask of the corporate entity, don't ever have actual control.

Much of the power to take action winds up residing in the hands of those people still in pursuit of wealth and power, with a raw ambition and a desire to succeed at all costs. These are mainly very talented, very ambitious people running a gauntlet of competition, who recognize how easily they can escape any consequences for their actions.

It would be nice to think that the pursuit of wealth corresponded to the pursuit of contributing to humanity, but the opposite is all too often, more true, and the pursuit of great wealth is often counter to the pursuit of contributing to humanity.

I am all for success in business, and those who take a risk to make something happen, but that is a whole lot different pursuit than seeking to climb the ladder of very old, well established corporations, like the ICBs.

reply to post by hellobruce

Would you care to elucidate? and who is 'we' BTW?

reply to post by SkepticOverlord

The bogey-man conspiracy of the Rothschilds controlling the current US Federal reserve is one I've never found substantiating evidence.

Hehe that's amazing, I've never found a conspiracy substantiating evidence either!! Conspiracies are innocent, maan. Yawn.