It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
reply to post by bjax9er
and I would like to thank you for your post,
I don't think Obama is running the country, I really don't.
Maybe nobody is, they all seem lethargic, McCain was running for president he seemed lethargic, Romney seemed lethargic.
what the heck is going on?
edit on 092828p://bThursday2013 by Stormdancer777 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by muse7
Sorry to interrupt the circle jerk, but where exactly was Barack Hussein Obama on the night that a huge asteroid struck earth and wiped out the dinosaurs? That's another question that has been popping into my head.
I think I'll email breitbart so they can write a story about his absence on that tragic night 65 million years ago
Originally posted by phantomjack
Wow. I find this "absence" VERY telling of the President and his knowledge of what was going to go down that night.
Originally posted by phantomjack
Where was he?
Originally posted by phantomjack
Did he stay out of the kitchen on purpose? Too hot for him?
Did he feel guilt or shame for what he was about to "allow" to happen?
Makes me wonder.
Does it make you wonder?
Originally posted by bjax9er
Originally posted by muse7
Sorry to interrupt the circle jerk, but where exactly was Barack Hussein Obama on the night that a huge asteroid struck earth and wiped out the dinosaurs? That's another question that has been popping into my head.
I think I'll email breitbart so they can write a story about his absence on that tragic night 65 million years ago
yes the ignorance of the democrat voters is very disturbing isn't it?
and then when their incompetent leader screws up they talk about circle jerks and asteroids.
maybe you should visit breitbart every once in a while, you might learn something you would otherwise not learn from the complicit progressive media.
nah, you wouldn't do that, wouldn't want to realize what a dooooosh you've been all this time.
they don't care at all, one way or the other, they don't care.
Originally posted by muse7
Originally posted by bjax9er
Originally posted by muse7
Sorry to interrupt the circle jerk, but where exactly was Barack Hussein Obama on the night that a huge asteroid struck earth and wiped out the dinosaurs? That's another question that has been popping into my head.
I think I'll email breitbart so they can write a story about his absence on that tragic night 65 million years ago
yes the ignorance of the democrat voters is very disturbing isn't it?
and then when their incompetent leader screws up they talk about circle jerks and asteroids.
maybe you should visit breitbart every once in a while, you might learn something you would otherwise not learn from the complicit progressive media.
nah, you wouldn't do that, wouldn't want to realize what a dooooosh you've been all this time.
Perhaps you should follow your own advice and visit other news websites besides breitbart and world net daily?
Originally posted by Stormdancer777
Dempsey admitted to being shocked that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton hadn’t known about the diplomatic cable from Ambassador Chris Stevens pleading for help prior to the attacks,
Originally posted by chasingbrahman
So Obama has shame?
Seriously? This IS big news!
Originally posted by phantomjack
Originally posted by chasingbrahman
So Obama has shame?
Seriously? This IS big news!
So thats what you take out of this? Obama's Shame? About Americans being killed?
Pathetic if you ask me.
Originally posted by phantomjack
Here is a bigger question: What exactly are they protecting the President from at this point?
By saying that the POTUS was not involved that day at this point, is giving plausible deniability to some new revelation that will come about soon about the event.
Panetta's testimony was nothing more than to give protection to the POTUS for something that is going to be revealed in the very near future.
So for a POTUS who is "hands on" to all of a sudden be "hands off" means that they are setting the stage to be able to say, "Potus had nothing to do with it..."
The question now becomes, what exactly is "it" that they are shielding his responsibility from?
I am sorry, but this stinks to high heaven.
Originally posted by chasingbrahman
Originally posted by phantomjack
Originally posted by chasingbrahman
So Obama has shame?
Seriously? This IS big news!
So thats what you take out of this? Obama's Shame? About Americans being killed?
Pathetic if you ask me.
Awww PhantomJack. Sounds like someone needs to feel a little more content with ridiculing facetious posts...
Now I must hang my head in disappointment as I've offended your sensibilities!
Perhaps as your doubtlessly judgemental mood improves, you'll grow to understand that for many of us here in the US, there is a groundswell of concern about our president's character. His shamelessness tops the list of our grievances. Especially around here.