It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Movie "Syriana" & my thoughts on mid-east disclosure (Part 1.)

page: 1

log in


posted on Feb, 4 2013 @ 04:45 PM
my interpretation of Syriana, mid east, CIA hint-dropping part 1....

Hey all,
This is my first thread so I'm going to keep it quite simple and just give a personal opinion on a movie with George Clooney and Matt Damon called Syriana. Trailer below if I embedded it right...

This movie no doubt went through the CIA's entertainment liaison. CIA: Entertainment Industry Liaison

NOTE: It would be preferable to discuss with those who 1. Like the movie and 2. Have seen the whole thing. The trailers there for a quick recap but if others wish to comment that's fine but it would be nice if you've actually watched it

Points I will look at with a notation, some may have two notations(*H=Historic event, *R=Recent event, *F=Future event) The future events are the juiciest because they drop big hints at the plans in place I believe.

Part 1.

  • US Presidents/CIA supporting specific Saudi families (H)

  • CIA/Mossad assassinating Iranian agents/officials (R)

  • Captured Westerners covertly held, sometimes murdered and filmed (H)

    Part 2.

  • Re-emergence of Communism and Islamism in the middle east (F)

  • Competing for control of two major pipelines in the middle east (F)

    I can see all of these things hinted, blatantly shown and sometimes only alluded to but they are there. The historic and current events are no big deal really, I'd agree on that. Although the possible "future" events these depictions in the movie are alluding to got me thinking just how much the CIA is involved in movies and why they do it. These points are by no means everything the movie shows but I'll explain the scenes that paraphrase these points to me with my opinion and a link or two
    Hope its an interesting read and not too boring, I like this stuff


    US Presidents/CIA supporting specific Saudis (*H)
    Its no secret that the US has maintained a close-knit relationship with the House of Saud for decades now. Since King Abdulaziz unified Saudi Arabia the Saudi Royal Family has been an influential voice in the Gulf and the middle-east. The discovery of oil and early partnerships with American companies, especially Chevron (formerly Standard Oil Co.) have made members of the family masses of untold wealth and the country itself a crucial partner to America.

    In Syriana, the two Princes and the incumbent (and frail) ruler are depicted as Prince Nasir Al-Subaai. Prince Meshal Al-Subaai and Emir Hamed Al-Subaai. These three men are an allegory of King Abdulaziz & his sons Faisal and Saud.

    They are both vying for control and want to assume power from their father and they both support different governments whom they prefer to partner with. Nasir has no problem with Communist Chinese influence in their country but Meshal and the Emir prefer the Americans, the money they give them and the protection troops on their soil provide. These events are similar to when American forces were kicked out and replaced with Egyptian troops by Faisal right before the Suez Crisis.

    However in the movie the son who did not take power was assassinated (Nasir) because he supported the Chinese. The CIA would be stepping into new territory if it assassinated a Royal Family member via drone strike but could be hinting as such. It need not be said that whomever favors the status-quo of the American presence will be backed and protected by the CIA and probably Mossad.


    CIA/Mossad assassinating Iranian agents/officials(*R)
    George Clooney's CIA character Bob in the movie, is shown in Tehran dealing with a supposed Iranian arms dealer
    and they seem to have been quite friendly. Bob sells this man who turns out to be an Iranian agent, a shoulder fired heat seeking missile. One missile and launcher gets into the hands of an extremist group whilst the other is rigged with an explosive and kills the two Iranian agents whilst the other slips through and Bob is immediately wary of what is happening.

    I think this scene above is a nod to the CIA's support to extremists especially because of the weapon depicted in the video below, same as the weapons sold in the movie. Old news I know, but they do like to rub it in I think!

    That video shows the Stinger missile in action by extremists, supplied to them by the CIA to turn the tables against Soviet forces. CIA supplying Stingers to extremists
    BUT, as we find out later those men killed were Iranian agents which may also be a nod to the covert assassination program taking place against Iranians involved with the nuclear program which is more recent. Assassination ops against Iran


    Captured Westerners covertly held, sometimes murdered and filmed(*H)
    This is shown more heavily in "Body of Lies" with Di Caprio but I find Syriana's more interesting...

    Be forewarned if squeamish, finger nail pulling! Ouch.

    The Iranian double agent who sold out Bob to the Chinese or his own government more than likely... tortures him, goes over Falun Gong torture methods used by Chinese agents and then is just about to kill him until the religious Hezbollah cleric intervenes and saves Bob.

    The cleric is probably that of Hassan Nasrallah

    It wouldn't make sense for an Iranian agent to take orders from just any Hezbollah member because of course, Nasrallah gets his instructions from Damascus and Tehran without a doubt. The extent of Iranian involvement into the filmed murders of Westerners is compelling. Daniel Pearl, Ken Bigley and countless others were beheaded and filmed in Iraq for propaganda purposes. Al Quaida in Iraq was alleged to be behind most of the executions and the man purported to be the most prolific executioner of Western captives was Jordanian born Abu Musab al-Zarqawi

    He allegedly enjoyed directly executing his prisoners and personally killed Daniel Pearl and Ken Bigley. On instructions from Tehran quite possibly. Pearl was a reporter accused of being an Israeli spy. Iran seems to be a fervent supporter of extremism and I think it factors into Tehran's asymmetric warfare strategy.

    The film shows the Iranian spy Mussawi as the executioner though which I believe they'd rarely partake in. They have many hands willing to do the dirty work.

    I will do PART 2 and last points shortly

  • posted on Oct, 16 2013 @ 11:59 AM
    There will be no part 2 because upon re reading and spending some further time here that was an aimless rant connecting dots that were not there. Such was my paranoia when I joined, what a bad start. Thread FAIL!


    log in