It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Hoax? Probably not.

page: 1

log in


posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 04:43 AM
From the Oxford English Dictionary:

Definition of hoax

a humorous or malicious deception: the evidence had been planted as part of an elaborate hoax [as modifier]: a hoax 999 call

[with object]

trick or deceive (someone).

It seems half the people here don't understand this simple concept.

Your government does not Hoax you , it cheats and lies and steals and kills.....

Vaccines are not a hoax, they are a elaborate lie
9/11 was not a hoax, it was a conspiracy (For example, lets not discuss it here please!)
Chem trails are not a hoax - unless someone is painting the sky with harmless vapor trails on purpose in order to then tell lies about them. You might think it is a con, but that is different.

So get it right people! If you don't even know what a hoax is how in hells name can you be qualified to chat about conspiracies?!?!?!? Jeeeeeeeeeez

Think of it like this: Is it a con or is it a hoax? 2 very different things.

posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 05:18 AM
Now that we've cleared that up, we can get back to the important issues.


Why ?

posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 05:28 AM
I've never in my life heard of the 911 hoax only the conspiracy, nor have I heard of vaccine hoaxes either really don't know exactly what this thread is pointing out... none of what your talking about even happens I'm pretty sure everyone on this site knows what a hoax is...

posted on Jan, 10 2013 @ 05:29 AM
reply to post by nothingwrong

G,day mate. no sweat. but, er, did yer toaster blow up this morning.


log in