It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AwakeinNM
Part of it is the fact that Ahmedinimidget stated in no uncertain terms that given the chance, he would wipe Israel from the face of the earth. Since we are allied with Israel, it stands to reason that we would defend them as such. I think it's a pretty compelling reason for preemptive action.
However, I think there needs to be undeniable proof that they have nukes.
edit on 9-1-2013 by AwakeinNM because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by superman2012
Congressional Armed Services Sub-Comittee briefing by CIA.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by superman2012
I watched the brief. I am sure you could find it as well as many other sources that show that U.S. Intel. services have stated although Iran is attempting to build a Nuke it has not yet done so.
Building an old style Fission Bomb is relatively easy if one has the fuel. Any kid at MIT could build one over a weekend.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by superman2012
reply to post by onthedownlow
No, I don't want people to parrot me.
I just wanted people to answer a VERY simple question if they were guilty of doing it.
..some people just don't understand that and put it on the internet for everyone to see...
Originally posted by superman2012
reply to post by zedVSzardoz
The only reason that it is perceived as a "state of war" is because the US is interfering with their local matters. That is what I am talking about. They want to tell countries what to do. But no country can tell them what to do. It is very hypocritical.
In June 2006, the Security Council adopted a resolution endorsing the P5 and Germany offer of diplomatic and economic incentives and demanding that Iran suspend all uranium enrichment programs by August 31. In December 2006, after Tehran's failure to comply, the Council imposed sanctions on Iran's trade in sensitive nuclear materials and technology. Following the IAEA's offer to Tehran of a 60 day grace period where halting of the country's uranium enrichment would be exchanged for suspension of UN sanctions which Iran did not take up, the Security Council passed Resolution 1747 in March 2007, intensifying the previous sanctions package while also naming specific officials as targets of the sanctions and adding additional sanctions against Iranian financial institutions.
Originally posted by superman2012
reply to post by onthedownlow
So are you saying because of your unjustified fear of Iran mixed with your love of your children you would support/do support what is going on in Iran (sanctions) because of a "what if"? I admire your honesty and if I thought my children were in danger, I too, would most likely be guilty of being a hypocrite.
Originally posted by superman2012
reply to post by dominicus
Doesn't matter about the structure of the Iranian government, when there were recently protests in that country to change the status quo, but the protesters were beaten into submission.
Kind of like the Occupy protests in the oh-so-more civilized US?
Originally posted by onthedownlow
Originally posted by superman2012
reply to post by onthedownlow
So are you saying because of your unjustified fear of Iran mixed with your love of your children you would support/do support what is going on in Iran (sanctions) because of a "what if"? I admire your honesty and if I thought my children were in danger, I too, would most likely be guilty of being a hypocrite.
First, I need to appoligize, I originaly believed gun rights to be the topic. Secondly, I support the sanctions against Iran because I believe that they are a threat to Israel and global security. I suppose that many in the world consider the US a threat, and by all means, they should take what ever actions they deem fit to defend themselves. That said, they should realize that those actions will only up the stakes, and in a time when a world war may be the only option for world powers that are edging up on insolvency. No, Americans won't lay down, we are far to proud, as well as much of the rest of the world, but we are playing this game from the respects of a large advantage. Hypocrisy? Maybe, but we will most likely write the history for the next generation, and we will just leave that little part out.