It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GeneralMishka
"If at any point in the future, a method for backward time travel becomes possible, all points in time (both past and future points) will immediately have evidence of backward time travel. In other words, we would know backward time travel is possible today if it is ever discovered in the future.
Let us call the point in time when backward time travel is first exercised, the fulcrum point. It is easy to explain how all points in time occurring after the fulcrum point will have evidence of backward time travel, as we now have evidence of everything that has occurred in the past. But how would all points in the past (including this point right here) have evidence of backward time travel if it happens after that point? Simple - people are stupid and greedy."
tomayko.com...
Ive come to a similar conclusion. What sayest thou?
Originally posted by GeneralMishka
"If at any point in the future, a method for backward time travel becomes possible, all points in time (both past and future points) will immediately have evidence of backward time travel. In other words, we would know backward time travel is possible today if it is ever discovered in the future.
Let us call the point in time when backward time travel is first exercised, the fulcrum point. It is easy to explain how all points in time occurring after the fulcrum point will have evidence of backward time travel, as we now have evidence of everything that has occurred in the past. But how would all points in the past (including this point right here) have evidence of backward time travel if it happens after that point? Simple - people are stupid and greedy."
tomayko.com...
Ive come to a similar conclusion. What sayest thou?
Originally posted by jjkenobi
Or the theory that if someone travels through time and changes something a new timeline is started. Then multiple parallel timelines would be in existence. Maybe they already are?
Originally posted by miniatus
I didn't read all of the posts before I chimed in.. but basically said what I said .. star
Originally posted by thedoctorswife
So aside from the different timelines theory, are we also speculating that the time traveller can not go back to before time travel/the time travel device is invented because it requires a reciever. It reminds me of the charlie chaplin film timetraveller lady (transexual??:lol , on a mobile phone, how could she be on a cellphone if there were no masts/satalites to recieve he call, (apologies my knowledge of phone science is very limited).
Originally posted by tpg47
Originally posted by thedoctorswife
So aside from the different timelines theory, are we also speculating that the time traveller can not go back to before time travel/the time travel device is invented because it requires a reciever. It reminds me of the charlie chaplin film timetraveller lady (transexual??:lol , on a mobile phone, how could she be on a cellphone if there were no masts/satalites to recieve he call, (apologies my knowledge of phone science is very limited).
An obvious observation that is purposely overlooked by some , because it doesn't fit into their little hypothesis.