It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by 0mage
We are so childish for wanting fire a natural process, created by NATURE, but they aren't childish for wanting their cars and everything else they use daily that creates pollution. Unnatural processes that are destroying the earth and lungs more than my fireplace or cigs ever could.
Originally posted by AnnKoontz
California is the worse. How can the call themselves Liberals, when all they do is take away people's rights? You can get drugged up and have all the orgies you want, but don't light a fire to keep yourselves warm.edit on 1-1-2013 by AnnKoontz because: (no reason given)edit on 1-1-2013 by AnnKoontz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by Dispo
Where do statistics come from?
They come from studies, studies come from observations, observations can be subjective or objective.
My observations lend to statistical evidence that fires are not causing the damage people claim they are.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by timetothink
Absolutely they can decide what form of fuel people can use. It is not your air, it is everyone's air. Just like it isn't your road, it is public roads, and it is not your water, it is everyone's water. And they can dictate what pollutions you release and when.
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by tgidkp
Mother Nature creates many fires and particulates from volcanos etc which are going off everyday.
Recent estimates of the relative strength of the three important sources of volatile sulfur (SO2 from fossil fuel combustion ∼78 Tg S/yr, from biomass burning ∼2 Tg S/yr, and from natural sources ∼25 Tg S/yr) suggest an over-whelming effect of the anthropogenic emissions for climate forcing.
PLUS........there are millions more cars than fireplaces so get off it, shutting down fireplaces doesn't make a damn difference.
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by nixie_nox
Read my above posts on the the requirement if some people to have fires, especially for economical reasons.
Other forms of heating are more damaging.
It is not up to the government to decide who can afford alternate heat or for whom a fire is necessary.
Just like it us not the governments right to take my gun or my big gulp.
edit on 2-1-2013 by timetothink because: (no reason given)