It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Nasa Cuts Live Feed From ISS Due To UFO?(Dec 16th, 2012 Footage)

page: 1
3

log in

join
share:

posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 12:26 PM
link   
From December 16th. 2012.

Feed gets cut at 1:23 in the video and the transmission resumes after 5 minutes. Object is gone after.

You decide.


Ufo at ISS(International Space Station). Nasa cuts live feed during the transmission for apparently no reason on 16 Dec. 2012. Allegedly a cylindrical object is seen just before the cut of the feed.



Seemingly, after the object is no longer present, the feed was activated again. The time span was five minutes.



The camera was attached to the Z1 Truss Segment, facing Destiny Laboratory Module, with the recently attached Leonardo's Permanent Multipurpose Module positioned on the right side of the screen. According to station's log from 16 Dec 2012, "Oleg Novitskiy activated the Russian payload TEKh-39 LCS in the service module", but there were no tasks for the crew on the American side of the station, which is in the scope of the camera. This is definitely an UFO.
source
edit on 12/22/2012 by mcx1942 because: fix

edit on 12/22/2012 by mcx1942 because: edited



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 12:32 PM
link   
Now if only they would land.




posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 12:35 PM
link   
I wish the footage is better. It is hard to tell the size of the object.

Could be debris, could be all sorts of things.

One thing it is for sure, is an unidentified flying object.

Now if it is an intelligent craft? I have no idea.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 12:35 PM
link   
That's either a reflection, or a part of the ISS. That was a letdown, I was expecting something else, like a UFO .



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 12:36 PM
link   
reply to post by mcx1942
 




You decide.

Ok. It's a reflection.
That was easy.

edit on 12/22/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 12:42 PM
link   
Uhm... it looks reflection. Waiting for a better video.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 12:52 PM
link   
ok i trust in you that it is a reflection..still if possoblke i would like to know what is being reflected and how



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 12:54 PM
link   
Do you guys mean a reflection on the camera lens?

That does make sense because after the transmission resumes, the ISS is in a stronger light source.

Seems possible.

edit on 12/22/2012 by mcx1942 because: fix



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 12:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by mcx1942
 




You decide.

Ok. It's a reflection.
That was easy.

edit on 12/22/2012 by Phage because: (no reason given)


and you know that cause...?



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 12:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Alda1981
 

Because I said so.
The OP told me to decide so I did. Problem solved.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 01:00 PM
link   
reply to post by mcx1942
 




That does make sense because after the transmission resumes, the ISS is in a stronger light source.

It's the same light source. The Sun. And it's at a different angle when the feed returns.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 01:08 PM
link   

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Alda1981
 

Because I said so.
The OP told me to decide so I did. Problem solved.


Because I said so.

this is the new Phage after the 21.12 ascension ?


seriously please..not that we are contradicting you..its that we really like a more detailed explanation



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 01:09 PM
link   
Wel, any idea what the reflection is of then?



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 05:47 PM
link   
reply to post by weavty1
 


Yes it's a reflection of the truss which is just to the left of the arrow, centre shot.



posted on Dec, 22 2012 @ 06:12 PM
link   
That spiral was TUBULAR duuuuude !!

OMG!



posted on Dec, 23 2012 @ 07:57 PM
link   
reply to post by Phage
 


How is that a reflection? I'm not saying it was aliens, but that is in NO way a reflection. You would kinnnnd of need something for it to be reflecting OFF of.

Didn't you people go to school? -_-;;


**The constant movement would result in the "reflection" fluctuating, at least a tiny bit. The object stay solid while the camera dims and brightens.
edit on 23-12-2012 by Pirateninjah because: Added content



new topics

top topics



 
3

log in

join