posted on Dec, 16 2012 @ 07:20 PM
However, the motivation behind the act may be an effort at immigration reduction. This proposed theory is elaborated on by Rep. Lofgren:
“[The STEM Jobs Act of 2012] is actually designed to reduce legal immigration. Taking 55,000 green cards from one category and putting them in
another may seem like an even trade, but it is not if the new category is drafted to ensure that green cards go unused. According to the National
Science Foundation, American universities currently graduate about 30,000 foreign students with degrees that would qualify them for green cards under
this bill. Assuming every single one of them wanted to stay and could find an employer willing to offer them a permanent job, which is certainly not
the case, that would still leave 25,000 green cards unused. This bill shamefully prevents those green cards from being used to help other employment
and family-based immigrants suffering in long backlogs” (Qtd. in McNaull)
It may or may not be the case, but it’s a compelling theory either way. Even if every graduate every year all wanted to stay here, that’s still
25,000 visas that aren’t being used. That means every year we would have to find 25,000 people with STEM degrees that aren’t already here and
aren’t recent graduates. That’s an unlikely prospect. Either the Republican side of congress feels that you can’t give out a green card without
taking it away from somebody else, or they devised a plan to decrease the overall amount of green cards that will be given out. Maybe it’s a
combination of both. Supporters of the bill, such as Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA), however want to make it clear that, “Only 5 percent of immigration
visas today are based on skills of education and other capacities--only 5 percent…. But today what we're dealing with is the ability to make a
profound difference of 55,000 opportunity jobs” (Qtd. in McNaull). The problem with this is if you look at the Department of Homeland Securities
immigration statistics, you’ll find that many of these degree holding people already seem to getting green cards without the implementation of this
program, as 66,831 “professionals with advanced degrees” obtained visas in 2011 (p. 21) which is probably the 5 percent Rep. Issa is referring
to.
Assuming that the statistics quoted by Rep. Lofgren given by the National Science Foundation are correct, then there’s little doubt that the
assertion is correct and many of the visas made available by this program will go unused. This wouldn’t be such an issue if it weren’t for the
fact this program is replacing the Diversity Visa program as oppose to being implemented in addition to it. Rep. Smith has stated that the Diversity
Visa program “invites fraud” (Qtd. in Dinan). Under the Diversity Visa program, there is a lottery among countries with low immigration to the
U.S. and people are selected at random for a visa. This lottery is free to register for; you just need to submit all the paper work through the
correct channels. However, there are people who call themselves “visa agents” who charge a fee to do this process for you.
Both sides agree that a visa program should be created to lure advanced degree holding individuals to reside here in the U.S. In fact, the
Democrats had proposed a very similar bill just four days earlier. H.R. 6412 was introduced by Rep. Lofgren on September 14th, 2012. The bill was
called Attracting the Best and Brightest Act of 2012. According to Govtrack.us, the bill is meant to “To amend the Immigration and Nationality Act
to provide for immigrant visas for certain advanced STEM graduates, and for other purposes” (H.R. 6412). It’s interesting how much H.R, 6412
resembles the STEM Jobs Act of 2012 introduced by Rep. Smith. The summary states that 55,000 visas be made available for STEM based degree holders,
have a job offer in a STEM field, are going to be paid wages at least that of what would be paid to somebody of similar qualification or experience,
and most importantly that any unused visas would be made available to other employment based visa categories (H.R. 6412). The unused visas would be
redirect to another employment based program instead of being “rolled-over” into the next year, essentially being left unused.