Syrian Rebels: “When We Finish With Assad, We Will Fight the U.S.”

Syrian Rebels: “When We Finish With Assad, We Will Fight the U.S.”

www.infowars.com...

A shocking report by McClatchy Newspapers’ David Enders reveals that the militants now on the front lines of the rebel uprising in Syria – supported by the Obama administration and other western powers – are Al-Qaeda terrorists who killed U.S. troops in Iraq and openly espouse their desire to “fight the U.S.” after they topple Bashar Al-Assad.

The official narrative at first attempted to deny the existence of Al-Qaeda terrorists in Syria altogether, before being forced to admit they were present but downplaying their role as limited and not characteristic of the rebel uprising.
However, Enders documents how Jabhat al Nusra, a group directly affiliated with Al-Qaeda, “has become essential to the frontline operations of the rebels fighting to topple Assad,” that the group is “critical to the rebels’ military advance” and how it conducts the “heaviest frontline fighting” in “battle after battle across the country.”

A journalist cited in the article also discovered “Nusra’s fighters on every frontline he visited.”
Jabhat al Nusra has claimed responsibility for numerous suicide bombings and other attacks that have killed hundreds of innocent people. Last weekend, disturbing footage emerged of one of their members slaughtering prisoners in cold blood.

Extremist militants have also ransacked Christian churches and carried out sectarianbeheadings.

The article quotes one of the members of the group, who stated unequivocally, “When we finish with Assad, we will fight the U.S.!”

The journalist who heard the comment considered that it could have been a “joke,” but it didn’t appear to be much of a laughing matter when Syrian rebels were shown on camera proudly burning U.S. flags on two separate occasions recently.

As we previously documented, rebel supporters chanted anti-American slogans as they torched the American flag in Homs and Aleppo.

Another opposition fighter recently spoke of his desire to see the Al-Qaeda flag fly over the White House once the rebels are victorious across the region. Suffice to say, he didn’t appear to be joking

Syrian rebel fighters are routinely photographed wearing the Al-Qaeda motif. There are also innumerable You Tube videos that show opposition forces flying the Al-Qaeda flag – the same distinctive black flag with white Arabic lettering that was flown by rioters during anti-U.S. demonstrations in numerous countries earlier this year.

French Surgeon Jacques Bérès, who worked at a hospital in Aleppo commented that at least half of the militants he treated for injuries were Al-Qaeda terrorists whose goal is to impose sharia law across Syria and the whole region. A German report estimated the figure of foreign fighters in Syria to be even higher - a staggering 95 per cent.

As we have also documented at length, the McClatchy piece emphasizes the fact that Jabhat al Nusra was responsible for killing U.S. troops in Iraq, noting how the group relies on, “the same people and tactics that fueled al Qaida in Iraq – an assertion that is borne out by interviews with Nusra members in Syria.”

“Among Nusra fighters are many Syrians who say they fought with al Qaida in Iraq, which waged a bloody and violent campaign against the U.S. presence in that country and is still blamed for suicide and car bombings that have killed hundreds of Iraqis since the U.S. troops left a year ago,” writes Enders.

The article asserts that the presence of these terrorists in Syria, “worries U.S. and other Western officials,” although it obviously wasn’t too much of a concern when the Obama administration signed off on over $200 million dollars in aid to the FSA rebels.

Nor was it much of a worry for the CIA when it helped the likes of Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Qatar funnel heavy arms to rebel groups in the region.

Although the establishment media has billed the rebels’ cause as a democratic uprising, one of the leaders of Jabhat al Nusra quoted in the McClatchy piece, Iyad al Sheikh Mahmoud, made it clear that there would be no free elections in Syria once Assad is toppled.

“Eighty percent of Syrians want Islamic law,” he said, referring to sharia law, an arcane and inherently brutal system of justice, with harsh punishments for those deemed to have broken its moral code, including torture and execution for sins such as adultery, homosexuality and robbery. The law also stifles free speech as it criminalizes criticism of Islam, the Quran, and the prophet Muhammad.

Why is the Obama administration supporting armed thugs who have not only killed U.S. troops in Iraq on behalf of Al-Qaeda, but also advocate the imposition of sharia law across the entire middle east and the overthrow of the United States and its replacement with an extremist Muslim dictatorship?

So...Obama is allowing this type of bloodshed to continue and grow.

While the Bush administration funded the 9/11 attack to push the terrorism propaganda agenda by the Elite, now you have Obama admin building on that by funding rebels and beheadings in Syria.

Really, is this why we vote in Presidents to allow this? This is wrong and there is NOTHING you can do about it.

My only other gut feeling is that Obama wants to take out other leaders in the world, but instead of just doing it himself with the US military, he is funding those in the country to do the dirty work for him so that he looks like a "shining star" in the media.

What a dirty business he is doing. Spending YOUR HARD EARNED AND HONEST LIVING TAX DOLLARS to fund beheadings and wars.

Is this where your tax dollars should be spent? OR should your tax dollars be used to reduce the US debt and help those in need in your own country?

Nothing surprising about it. The Liberal idea of appeasement does not work. It is and always will be a fairytale. The Middle East will continue to hate America, attack America and kill every American they can until we turn it into one big sandbox. The proper way to deal with them is through fear and respect. It is the harsh reality. The good people of the Middle East will not weed the extremists out of their society so they will become collateral damage in the end.

Its funny, even the MSM are doing reports from Syria with the Assad forces who are showing where the rebel snipers are bunkered down. Something doesn't seem right about it. One minute they are Satan, the next, they are good guys fighting for their country... Maybe its just to confuse us some more.

reply to post by DarknStormy


We need to be careful what the MSM reports and what actually is happening behind closed doors.

Sad as it is until the corporatism, lobbying and such are gone from politics there isn't much we can do.

Every group we arm at some point turns around to fight us. Bin Laden comes to mind, Iraq/Iran is another.

It's the "Shadow Government" that JFK & Bill Clinton have publicly alluded to.

Eisenhower said (paraphrasing) “Beware of the military/industrial complex” as he departed office.

The missing money from the budgets, or black budget, likely fund the industries (and rebels/terrorists) that further make money with war - we actually want to fight the folks we arm. It keeps the money-making cycle rolling.

Edit: This is not about one president or either party - some call it the genesis of the Bilderberg Group. Who knows.

reply to post by Skywatcher2011


Its not hard to work out that terrorists are operating in Syria. Some of the tactics are extremist all over. Car bombings, Beheadings, attacking Christians etc. If they are doing those, then I'm positive they are killing innocents across the country and the West is just blaming Assad.

Its sad because the Arabs get all the hate and so far they are the most oppressed out of all people

In situations such as these, there is no need to trust anyone, but yourself, based upon logic and reason, as propaganda will be flying everywhere, more so from the Humanslayer Assad and the paid supporters who gives not a damn to human lives except their own.

Fact 1:- the islamic militants are but only a few, and are attention whores.

Fact 2:- they are foolhardy, too cowardly to kill themselves, but hope others to do the dirty job to end their pathetic existance, and thus often place themselves in danger to hopefully get killed or injured.

Fact 3:- islamic militants had always hated US, not because of what US had done, but because US is the only country in the world that have the guts to take them down, refusing to bow down to their tyranny while other nations had meekly surrender.

Fact 4:- These loudmouth islamic militants DO NOT represent the majority syrians of both refugees and fighting men.

Fact 5. These nutjobs DO NOT want US or the west to help the syrian people, so that they can be the top dogs and the syrian people FOREVER beholden to them, enslaved and lick the ground that they walk on, even if in the end, all syrians die and syria in ruins.

USA can simply walk over and not bother about Syria. Let them stew in their own soup. Ultimately the ones who suffer will be the syrians themselves. But for the sake of the innocents, USA had never looked away when humanity got into trouble, and had tried always to help.

It's high time to shut up and ship the islamic militants and their supporters to where they belong - mental institutes, and let free humans know freedom and live.

One nuke will do to stop the terrorists....unfortunately that will also be the beginning of WW3.

reply to post by Skywatcher2011


Without nuking the whole populace while aiming strictly at the terrorists, it is worth noting the US has *always* had issue with this faith (see why below). Founding Father & President, Thomas Jefferson, was no fan of Islam. And, the opening lines of the US Marine Corps hymn say: "...to the Shores of Tripoli." It's reminder of not only the first overseas wars the US fought, but also a subtle clue about where the US first focused its war efforts - in an Islam nation.

A few years later, in 1786, the new United States found that it was having to deal very directly with the tenets of the Muslim religion. The Barbary states of North Africa (or, if you prefer, the North African provinces of the Ottoman Empire, plus Morocco) were using the ports of today's Algeria, Libya, and Tunisia to wage a war of piracy and enslavement against all shipping that passed through the Strait of Gibraltar. Thousands of vessels were taken, and more than a million Europeans and Americans sold into slavery. The fledgling United States of America was in an especially difficult position, having forfeited the protection of the British Royal Navy. Under this pressure, Congress gave assent to the Treaty of Tripoli, negotiated by Jefferson's friend Joel Barlow, which stated roundly that "the government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion, as it has in itself no character of enmity against the laws, religion or tranquility of Musselmen." This has often been taken as a secular affirmation, which it probably was, but the difficulty for secularists is that it also attempted to buy off the Muslim pirates by the payment of tribute. That this might not be so easy was discovered by Jefferson and John Adams when they went to call on Tripoli's envoy to London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman. They asked him by what right he extorted money and took slaves in this way. As Jefferson later reported to Secretary of State John Jay, and to the Congress:

The ambassador answered us that [the right] was founded on the Laws of the Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners, that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was sure to go to Paradise.

Source: www.slate.com...

It is believed that after learning this Jefferson found the first opportunity to make war with the Northern African states; he used the newly created US navy and Marines to fight Islam.

"A shocking report...."

Anyone else catch a whiff of Sorcha Fail/David Booth?

Considering they are funding these Sharia fanatics to overtake the regions and murder, terrorize so many.

I wanted verification of this article.

www.breitbart.com...

Here it looks like, if true, the Obama government is set to be sending battletanks and F-16's to Egypt, and basically this takeover, Egypt , Libya and Syria is all by the same group, and seems to be supported by TPTB and the current US government.

Then this

www.bbc.co.uk...
Russia: Syria rebels have US-made weapons

What exactly is going on? The US and Free World Powers are funding Sharia Brother hood Terrorists to overtake the entire region and impose Sharia with much bloodshed on everyone?

I think we need to wake up considerably more.

Originally posted by Jason88

Every group we arm at some point turns around to fight us. Bin Laden comes to mind, Iraq/Iran is another.

The missing money from the budgets, or black budget, likely fund the industries (and rebels/terrorists) that further make money with war - we actually want to fight the folks we arm. It keeps the money-making cycle rolling.

edit on 10-12-2012 by Jason88 because: (no reason given)

Exactly. Arm the rebellion to kill two birds with one stone. Obama (or TPTB) sees it as a way to remove Assad from power without doing it himself, and in the end, when it comes to the rebellion rebelling against US: they can be crushed in our efforts to "create a stable government abroad", the money/arms quietly moved back into our hands

The problem arises, however, when Russia ups arms deals to fund Assad's regime.

Two power players enter the chess match now...the Syrians are merely the pawns

Originally posted by Plan2exist18
when it comes to the rebellion rebelling against US: they can be crushed in our efforts to "create a stable government abroad", the money/arms quietly moved back into our hands

You mean like we crushed them in Libya, Egypt, Afghanistan, Iraq, and so on? In every country the U.S. has gotten militarily and politically involved in the Islamists and Jihadis have benefited and expanded. Obama thinks he can buy them and there will be some comfy arrangement i.e. Saudi Arabia. $1 billion+ of U.S. taxpayer money to the Islamists in Egypt. He is insane, but that is the ideology of progressive liberalism at work. It will not work and we're seeing the initial signs of that. We got rid of Gaddafi, why? Libya is now a hotbed of Al-Qaeda. They killed U.S. Ambassador Stevens and we still haven't learned. Now we want to remove Assad and let the lunatics take over there too. And note, the anti-muhammad movie was a bunk excuse, the raid on the consulate was proven to be pre-planned.

You talk about the arms moving back into our hands? The arms we shipped to rebels in Libya went straight into the hands of Al-Qaeda associated networks. They took them to Mali and established a sharia state by force. Mali is now in disarray and ordinary people are suffering, all because we gave our weapons to the "wrong guys". Oops. And now we're going to do it again! Don't let them tell you Al-Qaeda is a dozen guys in a cave. It's a GLOBAL NETWORK OF THOUSANDS OF ASSOCIATED GROUPS.

Tell me how we crush a radical united Sunni Caliphate that extends from the Atlantic to the Arabian Sea without starting WW3. A Caliphate that has the latest in Russian and Chinese weaponry, and possibly nuclear techology. The kind of war that is coming will make Iraq/Afghanistan look like a pillow fight.

I don't feel sorry for us. We deserved it by allowing Morons to control our policy. I feel sorry for the students and others who began the protests early in the Arab Spring before it was co-opted by the mass-mobilization of Jihadis. Millions of them pour into the frontlines from all over North Africa, the Middle East and South Asia like pirhanas who get a whiff of blood.

They are also a menace to Israel as evident from their Nazi salutes. Israel should support Assad.

What you quoted from me is not actually what happens, I was merely stating Obamas way of thinking... I happen to agree with you 100% - it NEVER works that way.

Originally posted by SteveR
They killed U.S. Ambassador Stevens and we still haven't learned. Now we want to remove Assad and let the lunatics take over there too. And note, the anti-muhammad movie was a bunk excuse, the raid on the consulate was proven to be pre-planned.

Dead on, proven by the declassified contents of Ambassadors Stevens private journal writings. This just shows how serious the greater plans are that are put in place, the Govt is willing to cover up a situation like this to try to move their agenda forward. This was a perfect opportunity to shift the Overton Window on American views on Muslims/Freedom of Speech.

I don't feel sorry for us. We deserved it by allowing Morons to control our policy. I feel sorry for the students and others who began the protests early in the Arab Spring before it was co-opted by the mass-mobilization of Jihadis. Millions of them pour into the frontlines from all over North Africa, the Middle East and South Asia like pirhanas who get a whiff of blood.

The Jihadis see these uprising as a chance to move into power and their original chance for starting a "rebellion" is lost. Obama...unfortunately...will continue to support these rebellions, just as hes supported groups in Lybia, Egypt, Syria, and even here at hope with Occupy Wallstreet, for his own personal reasons (cough cough anti-Imperialist)

Good post above ^^^ Star for you. Apologies if you took my post the wrong way.

reply to post by Skywatcher2011

So...Obama is allowing this type of bloodshed to continue and grow.

Not just allowing it, he is funding it, with american tax payer dollars and Hillary Clinton is in on it. The entire U.S. government needs to be tried for treason, because they fund these scum bags and give them weapons and teach them how to kill, and then they turn what they learned back on us in true backstabbing fashion.

So our own government is funding these people to kill our own people. If that isn't reason, then there is no such thing as treason. I'm sick of these lies.

Ha....Ha.....HAHAHAHAHAHA!


They can't be serious...can they? I guess they never said anything about "winning". Is that the over all objective? What's the End Game here???