Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Colorado Springs Apartment Manager Threatens to Raise Rent of Obama Voters

page: 2
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join

posted on Dec, 9 2012 @ 12:30 AM
link   
reply to post by snarky412
 


Well he probably won't be managing the place once the lawsuits go into place.




posted on Dec, 9 2012 @ 12:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kaploink
Frankly, there is no way for him to determine who his tenets voted for unless they offer the information or had political signs. If he tries to base it on race with minorities being Obama supporters and whites being Romney supporters, he is just asking for legal problems.


He's already compromised his position, whether he uses demographics or not. It would be discrimination based on political ideology.



posted on Dec, 9 2012 @ 01:10 AM
link   
I think it's legitimate. I don't believe the fair housing law actually covers political beliefs, which is a hilarious oversight. Since small businesses will be collapsing as obamacare and the huge obama tax increases march forward, it's perfectly legitimate to both raise rents and to target those most responsible for this fiscal mess. We are seeing Obama supporters being fired as well. They would be the first I would fire too. After all Obama will take care of them, NOT.

Oh and the soup kitchens and shelters would be helping them, but it seems that Obama wants to eliminate the charitable deductions. So I guess FEMA will be taking care of them in their concentration camps. It's time for Omerica to receive her reward for her sins.



posted on Dec, 9 2012 @ 01:35 AM
link   
The next headline associated with this story is gonna read, 'Idiot Who Threatened to Raise Democrat Voters' Rent Has Been Fired' ... and he was the manager, not the owner.

I would HATE to work for that guy. His actions SCREAM of someone who has a superiority complex and anger management issues.



posted on Dec, 9 2012 @ 01:58 AM
link   
reply to post by Cypress
 





He's already compromised his position, whether he uses demographics or not. It would be discrimination based on political ideology.


More like political idiot-ology.......


snarky



posted on Dec, 9 2012 @ 02:09 AM
link   
reply to post by BrokenAngelWings33
 

FHA ??

that's so not even applicable in this instance but hey, you're entitled to your opinion.

toooooo funny and the posters in this thread thus far have -0- sense of humor.

it is not illegal or unlawful for one to request another contact him.
it is not discriminatory to request a democrat "check-in"

and, it is not violating any aspect of FHA to blantantly share bad humor in a MEMO


whether i agree with his opinion or not is irrelevant but i do see the intended humor even tho i find it distatseful.



posted on Dec, 9 2012 @ 12:53 PM
link   

Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by BrokenAngelWings33
 


What part of this do you not understand?

Coercing, threatening, intimidating, or interfering with a person's enjoyment or exercise of housing rights based on discriminatory reasons or retaliating against a person or organization that aids or encourages the exercise or enjoyment of fair housing rights.


FHA ??

that's so not even applicable in this instance but hey, you're entitled to your opinion.

toooooo funny and the posters in this thread thus far have -0- sense of humor.

it is not illegal or unlawful for one to request another contact him.
it is not discriminatory to request a democrat "check-in"

and, it is not violating any aspect of FHA to blantantly share bad humor in a MEMO


whether i agree with his opinion or not is irrelevant but i do see the intended humor even tho i find it distatseful.
edit on 12/9/2012 by BrokenAngelWings33 because: Edit



posted on Dec, 10 2012 @ 12:33 AM
link   
reply to post by BrokenAngelWings33
 

i understand that just fine.
since you think i don't, why don't you be specific ?
exactly which part of that do YOU think applies here ?

who was discriminated against ?
who was retaliated against or intimidated by a 'memo' ?

better yet, whose enjoyment or exercise of housing rights has been interfered with, threatened or coerced ??
why don't you explain how any of that applies ... as YOU think it does.



posted on Dec, 10 2012 @ 04:16 AM
link   
reply to post by Honor93
 


if you have problems understanding what he did you are a worse than him.



posted on Dec, 11 2012 @ 01:08 AM
link   

Originally posted by BrokenAngelWings33
reply to post by Honor93
 


if you have problems understanding what he did you are a worse than him.
if you have problems understanding the rules of the game, perhaps you shouldn't play.



posted on Dec, 11 2012 @ 02:27 AM
link   
reply to post by Honor93
 


Perhaps you should go live in that building.



posted on Dec, 11 2012 @ 02:55 AM
link   

Originally posted by BrokenAngelWings33
reply to post by Honor93
 


Perhaps you should go live in that building.
as someone who supports self-reliance, why in the world would i do that ?

btw, mine may be a dry sense of humor but at least it isn't NONE at all.
edit on 11-12-2012 by Honor93 because: add txt






top topics



 
2
<< 1   >>

log in

join