It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Mr Tranny
reply to post by fenian8
What is the difference between a business man having an animal killed to save money, when he didn’t need to. And a consumer having an animal killed so he can eat it, when he doesn’t really need the meat to survive?
It’s all a mater of degrees.
You are just trying to draw hard lines between them so you can try to stoke outrage where little, to none, is warranted.
That is the standard method of hard-line animal rights activist. If the shoe fits, it fits.
Originally posted by papazen
Too many city boy hipsters here commenting about things they dont understand. The man did what had to be done but he did it incorrectly so fine him and the company thats it end of story. Natives do this many times when the salmon season is low and there is no food to give a hundred dogs.
If he thought what he did was right why doesw he say he feels remorse?
Originally posted by ahamarlin
In a civilized county, a dog should be humanely euthanised by a licensed veterinarian when there is no other solutionfor the animal (except for example a very powerfull breed attacking people and its self defense)
This obedient worker who slaughtered the dogs AND his boss should go to jail and rethink what they have done.
Since only veterinarians can legally possess euthanasia drugs, many veterinary experts suggest that the best way to carry out that plan is with a well-placed bullet. It's a practice regularly used on farms and ranches across America, and widely used in Europe as the euthanasia of choice. (If you don't have a gun, try to recruit a policeman.)
Why A Gun?
The emotional and social baggage of firearms on this continent may make it difficult for you to accept that a violent weapon can be used for a humane purpose. But in Europe, learning how to perform euthanasia via gunshot is part of the official veterinary curriculum. Veterinarians there are exempted from gun-control restrictions. When proper technique is employed, many veterinarians report having fewer problems with this method than with lethal injection. They say it's faster, with none of the lingering that's often evident with injected agents.
There are basically 2 acceptable methods for humanely euthanizing livestock that do not
involve injecting lethal drugs (or combinations of drugs) and these are by means of a gunshot or the
use of a penetrating captive bolt pistol (followed by exsanguination). These methods can be
administered inexpensively and effectively and can be readily learned with minimal training. Care
must be taken to abide by all legal regulations when purchasing, carrying, or discharging
firearms. (Personnel who euthanize animals, especially on a regular basis, should be monitored
carefully for their attitude and level of comfort with carrying out the procedure. It is possible that
they may begin to develop a careless or callous attitude toward animals, or emotional discomfort
may begin to show as a result of euthanizing many animals. In these situations it is important to
quickly provide the proper support for the affected person and to delegate the responsibility for
humane euthanasia to another person, at least for a period of time.)
It's humane, quick & painless for the dog IF it is shot by someone who knows how to use a gun & where to place the bullet.
In my opinion it's generally easier for an owner to watch a dog die by lethal injection that be shot, because it sanitizes the process & makes death easier to handle.
While I would opt for euthanasia by injection because it would be easier for ME, if I knew how to use a gun & my dog was suffering, I would shoot it because that would be in its best interest.
"She's my dog. Why would I have someone else kill her?"
He said it with respect and honesty. He was trying to tell me that after 15 years together and all they had been through, he owed it to her to be the one. Why should he shirk from that duty?
Shooting can be the most painless and is sometimes the only available method to humanely dispose of an animal. However, a number of factors need to be considered prior to the discharge of firearms:
"She's my dog. Why would I have someone else kill her?"
He said it with respect and honesty. He was trying to tell me that after 15 years together and all they had been through, he owed it to her to be the one. Why should he shirk from that duty?