Chris Matthews is a big Douchebag. Ofcourse there is something to be concerned about or else why would this be behind closed doors if no national security was breached?
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by MDDoxs
On the other hand other news media are biased toward the Democrats. Chris Matthews was busy yakking about how all these affairs are no big deal and the Prez himself says he believes it doesn't represent a national security risk. I'm guessing the Prez is more worried about Petraeus testifying than he is the affairs with women.
Also Petraeus will testify behind closed doors, so there must be some sensitive stuff.
edit on 15-11-2012 by ThirdEyeofHorus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Flow101
reply to post by DoubleDNH
Patraeus obviously was forced to quit by the Obama administration and the sex scandal is just lies!!!
Too bad the Obama administration can't stop him from testifying!!! Patraeus is going to expose Obama administration!!!! /end sarcasm
One day later after he testifies: OMG he's covering up for Obama administration!, they must've threatened him or something!
Seriously, most people (mainly republicans) will still say it was a cover up no matter what, Obama HAD to do something wrong here.
Originally posted by Deetermined
News coming out that the process in which the talking points were processed may have ultimately been determined by the State Department.
Ex-CIA chief Petraeus testifies Benghazi attack was al Qaeda-linked terrorism
Washington (CNN) -- Former CIA Director David Petraeus testified on Capitol Hill Friday that the attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Libya, was an act of terrorism committed by al Qaeda-linked militants.
That's according to Rep. Peter King of New York, who spoke to reporters after a closed hearing in the House, which lasted an hour and 20 minutes.