It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by BeneathBaseStupidity
Can someone please outline to me just how the planet is meant to sustain a Western style ascent into First World living, incorporating the populations we deal with today and the speed with which this modernisation is taking place? How can a planet with a forecast 9 billion population (2050) reasonably be expect to sustain such 'virus like' dissemination without reaching a critical mass?
Originally posted by ArMaP
Originally posted by BeneathBaseStupidity
Can someone please outline to me just how the planet is meant to sustain a Western style ascent into First World living, incorporating the populations we deal with today and the speed with which this modernisation is taking place? How can a planet with a forecast 9 billion population (2050) reasonably be expect to sustain such 'virus like' dissemination without reaching a critical mass?
That's easy, those that today enjoy the "First World" living style will move to a "Second" or "Third" world living style, to keep things in balance.
Originally posted by BeneathBaseStupidity
With every article reassuring us of and, indeed, promoting enthusiasm towards China's rapid ascendency, comes a dozen other articles chronicling the clear and present pitfalls of an accelerated economic expansion of such a populous and, in some ways, backward country.
Be it the egregious pollution related offshoots of the 'crash course' industrialisation of the country; the wanton pillaging of the Earth's endangered fauna in the form of shark fins, elephant ivory and the like for consumption or status symbolisation; or the indirect environmental effects of countries digging up their own backyards (and more) in order to cash in on China's insatiable hunger for resources -- it seems that any positive spin that can be placed on the rise of a nation of 1.35 billion humans that need to be fed, housed and want their base human whims pandered to, has fine print that may result in a 'GFC' (Global Future Crisis) that will make the last few years seem utopic. And this isn't even touching on the likes of equipollent India or even Indonesia!
I'm having trouble reconciling the idea that 'the West' took a century or more to industrialise and acquire the First World standard of living it has today - with all its nefarious offshoots, many of which we're still to square with nature - with a 'Chinese model'. The equation just does not seem to work. All I keep arriving at are mass extinctions, resulting in insufficient food supplies and, invariably, mass (/world) wars fought over food and resources (and living space).
Can someone please outline to me just how the planet is meant to sustain a Western style ascent into First World living, incorporating the populations we deal with today and the speed with which this modernisation is taking place? How can a planet with a forecast 9 billion population (2050) reasonably be expect to sustain such 'virus like' dissemination without reaching a critical mass?
Has short-sighted Western greed, through the agency of Asian appetence, dug a grave for this species / planet? Is a 'culling' of our species the only way to ensure our on-going survival? If so, could this mean that war is a necessity of evolution, rather than the humanistic shortcoming we've historically dismissed it as?
Originally posted by wdkirk
......of the 1.35 billion China folks....half live in rural communities and half live in cities.
Originally posted by ArMaP
those that today enjoy the "First World" living style will move to a "Second" or "Third" world living style, to keep things in balance.
Originally posted by DerepentLEstranger
the entire OP looks like it was cribbed from kissingers NSSM200 and applied to china
Originally posted by lewman
China's may be on the rise but the resources that they use still falls short in comparison to the Unites States.
Originally posted by James1982
we all can NOT have this same standard of living without some free energy device or replicators from star trek.
Originally posted by RocksFromSpace
You spelled "ISRAEL" wrong ..
Originally posted by BeneathBaseStupidity
Originally posted by ArMaP
those that today enjoy the "First World" living style will move to a "Second" or "Third" world living style, to keep things in balance.
That falls under the moniker of 'war'. I mean, if I threatened your way of life, what would you do?
Originally posted by Silcone Synapse
China are more of a threat to our many endangered species IMO.
If they had their way they would kill all the rhino's,tigers,bears,seahorses,and many more for their "medicines."
They seem to have zero compassion for animals,which I think is a good indicator of how they would treat humans in other lands,if they ever became the big superpower.