It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by badgerprints
Originally posted by hangedman13
Very short sighted. What will the dems do when they are on that side of the fence? Not like they never filibustered. Reid should actually do his job and submit a budget proposal. Seems to me that is the reason for the whole budget problem, a lack of one.
It's a surreal thing that Obama has just won his second term and never had a budget passed.
Originally posted by romney
On the other side of the coin, I doubt the founding fathers created a lawmaking body just to
have it neutered by obstructionism each day everyday. The Constitution did not mandate
60 votes to get anything done.
The GOP is gonna have to grow a pair and finally start cooperating, they lost exactly because
of their piss poor, baby attitude.
Originally posted by xuenchen
Originally posted by romney
On the other side of the coin, I doubt the founding fathers created a lawmaking body just to
have it neutered by obstructionism each day everyday. The Constitution did not mandate
60 votes to get anything done.
The GOP is gonna have to grow a pair and finally start cooperating, they lost exactly because
of their piss poor, baby attitude.
The Democrats too need a "new pair".
Their "old pair" is worn out and shrunken.
They seem to shout and scream louder than new born babies every time somebody says they are wrong about something.
They can bend a little too.
The American citizens need the economy back.
The same voter base has a Republican majority in the House.
Originally posted by Jeremiah65
reply to post by xuenchen
Senate Bill S-3457 The veterans Job Corps Act. It allocated a billion dollars to train and hire returning vets for a mixture of things from firefighting to conservation work and national park service. The price tag was spread out over 5 years.
Originally posted by Jeremiah65
reply to post by xuenchen
Senate Bill S-3457 The veterans Job Corps Act. It allocated a billion dollars to train and hire returning vets for a mixture of things from firefighting to conservation work and national park service. The price tag was spread out over 5 years.
Originally posted by SaturnFX
Yes, can't figure out why Reid wants to address filibuster...
its not like one side of the aisle completely destroyed its intent
My solution though is to simply require people to literally sit in and do a proper filibuster verses just motions for it..aka, if your going to say your going to hold your breath until you turn blue, you have to actually do it.
That right there will push filibustering down to only the important thing verses just a tool to cripple any and everything the majority wants to do.
You shouldn't need a super majority to pass even the most basic stuff.
Originally posted by xuenchen
Now we have Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid trying to somehow change the filibuster rules.
He wants to limit the U.S. Senate minority party (currently Republican) power to stop legislation that sometimes goes too far and many times goes against the principals that voters intended to uphold.
Filibusters many times have avoided hidden corruption in legislation.
It sounds like Reid is against all people who voted for Republicans regardless of whether or not ideas and proposed legislation would have positive impacts on the majority of Americans.
I guess his type prefer a single party system by majority default ?
What would that produce ?
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Wednesday that he will try to push through a change to Senate rules that would limit the GOP’s ability to filibuster bills.
Speaking in the wake of Tuesday’s election, which boosted Senate Democrats’ numbers slightly, Mr. Reid said he won’t end filibusters altogether but that the rules need to change so that the minority party cannot use the legislative blocking tool as often.
“I think that the rules have been abused and that we’re going to work to change them,” he told reporters. “Were not going to do away with the filibuster but we’re going to make the Senate a more meaningful place.”
Reid moves to limit GOP filibusters
Green groups said Wednesday that they plan to make Senate rules reform to limit filibusters one of their top priorities heading into the next Congress.
The organizations said they succeeded in their campaign strategy of electing Senate allies as a buffer against legislation from the GOP-dominated House.
But the groups said current Senate rules requiring 60 votes to move beyond a filibuster are untenable and will stunt progress on clean energy and environmental bills.
Senate filibuster reform atop green group priorities
If controversial legislation is so great, why does the opposing party always seem to be against it ?
The U.S. House is majority Republican by voter mandate.
In fact, the House I think gained a few Republican seats this election !!
What does that tell us ?
Checks & balances are part of the system !
What's the point of having a majority if the minority can deny a bill to be passed!
Do you happen to know the bill number for that? We need to check and see if there was any hidden BeeEss.
For example the jerk off republicans filibustered the "Bring Jobs Home Act" which would have given tax incentives to companies who create jobs at home and also incentives to companies who brought jobs back home from over seas, and that on top of reversing the tax incentives the lovely bush ass holes gave to companies who offshore jobs!!!!! Why should any company be given tax break to cheapen the cost of outsourcing?
As the Obama campaign targets Mitt Romney’s record at Bain Capital, political ads and the commentators who follow them have zeroed in once again on the issue of outsourcing. Senate Democrats rallied to the cause proposing the “Bring Jobs Home Act” on July 9, only to see it die by filibuster last week. This bill had many flaws, but its biggest mistake was opposing the global growth of American companies. Both economic sense and basic decency suggest that our policies should encourage more employment in the United States.
The credit would have created bizarre corporate incentives. Imagine a company that’s deciding between establishing a factory costing $1 million in Honduras and establishing a $10 million factory in Massachusetts. The greater productivity here might well offset the higher costs.
But under the Bring Jobs Home Act, a smart company would open first in Honduras, then shut down and then relocate to the Bay State. The firm would get $2 million in tax credits, which would more than offset the cost of the Honduran operation. The tax code would encourage businesses to start a foreign operation first — by subsidizing the cost of later switching to the United States.
The act would provide a credit even for fully automated factories. But why should we provide tax credits for units that employ nobody?
This was a vote on “cloture”, which means to end debate so that an up-or-down vote can be taken. A vote in favor is a vote to end debate, while a vote against is a vote to prolong debate or to filibuster.
Originally posted by badgerprints
Originally posted by hangedman13
Very short sighted. What will the dems do when they are on that side of the fence? Not like they never filibustered. Reid should actually do his job and submit a budget proposal. Seems to me that is the reason for the whole budget problem, a lack of one.
It's a surreal thing that Obama has just won his second term and never had a budget passed.
Originally posted by MystikMushroom
If the Republicans win back the Senate, won't you be happy if the rules were changed?
I'm just saying that this might be good for the Democrats right now, it has long-lasting impacts that will be beneficial to the GOP down the road.
Come on now, don't be so short-sided!