It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Socrato
reply to post by hotel1
No but I worry about it a lot for some reason.
Look, I know this sounds bad at first, but it is really no different than criminals who commit a robbery being charged much harder if they carried a weapon on their person while the robbery was committed in my opinion. I'm in no way implying that women who are not married are worth less than married women. I just want the punishment for rape to increase across the board, but it seems like people are reluctant to do this for whatever reason. Many rapists get out after just a few years. That is not fair at all. I figure a common sense law like this would be a good starting point to decreasing the instance of rape of any woman because a rapist will never know if the woman is married or not
When they get an idea to hurt a woman, they can remember they might lose their entire life, if the one they chose happened to be married. I think many potential rapists would let the urge slide at that point.
I'm sorry of this is offending people.
Originally posted by Socrato
The rapist of a married woman affects 2 lives directly that of the wife and the husband, not to mention he threatens to destroy a 3rd entity, that being the marriage. And if there are children in the marriage their livelihoods are threatened as well.
I think the penalty for violent rape of any woman should be life in prison, but if lawmakers are reluctant to do that, then can we at least agree that the penalty for violent rape of a married woman should be life in prison?