reply to post by fastbob72
Exactly,target foods is your own theory and it continually stating it over and over doesnt turn bull# nonsense into inspired thinking.
easy to say, but doesn't explain why no one has been able to debunk it.
So far the odd things that I have heard from people that they were unable to prove are...
"A species just eats what ever."
"The food evolves right along side with the consumer." But still doesn't explain how the choice is made.
"Experimentation is done by all species untill they arrive at a food they like." This was debunked as all species are choosing the same food within
a species, and we never find them experimenting.
So as you can see, Target food is valid, and proves that intelligent programing is somehow involved into every living species that eats for food.
look you win,i'm not wasting anymore of my time argueing this crap cos you are convinced you are right and repeating your same nonsense makes it
Of course if I were wrong, you would have no problem proving that, instead you just claim you don't want to dispute it, as I'm sold
on it. LOL. Could it be that you can't prove me wrong because I'm not wrong?
you have proved that if you keep saying the same thing over and over and over people the whole thing up as pointless cos it is.
I know you'll consider it a moral victory and vindication of target foods.
And with each time that I repeat it, you have the golden
opportunity to prove me wrong, and out of all these chances, you haven't.
You've created a whole complex phenomena fröm behaviour based on evironment,availabiliy and adaption and instinct.
The more there is involved, the easier it should be for you to prove me wrong. Instead, you insist that I'm just wrong. Aside from it
obviously not agreeing with evolution, can you name one part that can be proven wrong?
You can't even suggest that species choose their diet through choice because they are all making the same decision as a species. There is obviously
a lot more to it than just that, and evolution failed in this catagory.
It really is the most chlldlike,pathetic,drivel i've ever heard,,your arguement goes its true because i say it,i say it because its true ad infinitum
No it's true because not a single person has proven it wrong.
And if its really so childish why did one person here on ATS claim he didn't believe that I made up this theory, that someone else did and I stole it
from them? He coulden't prove it wrong either. Nor could he find a claimed author.
Nope Target food was observed by me, however, I'm not the first to realize that it's true...
How do animals have
it all figured out
An even better question is how do animals know what not to eat...
How can animals detect poisioness things...
So as you can see, your wrong. Other people have identified that there is a hell of a lot more to animals choosing food, then choice, more than
selection, more than food groups. The observation goes beyond those limitations down to programing.
But please don't take my word for it, look up as many diets about animals as you want and see for yourself.
You will see that they always eat the same things as a species.
You will see that there never is an experimental stage to eating, unless of course the animal is being starved.
You will see that there never is the eating of rocks and dirt to find out that isn't food, they are pre programmed to know what food they are to look
Evolution failed in explaining all of this down to the detail, just a brazen assumption was made that food also evolves just like the species. With no
merit of course.