posted on Nov, 3 2012 @ 06:32 AM
reply to post by ollncasino
I couldn't make sense of your Opening post. In your post you mention 800 millions of Islamites and then give a percentage in relation to Christians,
I'm only guessing there is more to that fact that mere chance as it makes direct comparisons impossible...
detailing how relatively weak Islam is educationally, economically and scientifically compared to other civilizations.
There is no more any Islamic civilization as there is a Christian one, civilization has long surpassed religious divides, this seems to have occurred
somewhere during the Renascence. We members of the human civilization owe much to Islam as the Europe crumbled during the dark ages...
In fact historically Islam made many contributions to human cultural evolution.
I also do no fully understand what you claim to be Islamic nations, I'm guessing by the tone of the post that those that impose sharia law ? This
would be a very weak definition...
Then you mention national production, how many Muslims are in the USA or China ?
I really do not see any interest even rationality on the questions you advance. You should probably start by define Islamic nations so to be
understood. Then think about the history of those nations and compare them with Germany or the UK in the level of stability and industrialization (or
the lack of it and why).
I think that I can probably reply in general terms that the nations that have a political system directly connected to Islamic doctrines are more
backward socially, technologically and economically due to historic events, bad location (oil and climate), the way Islamic doctrine limits equal
participation of their citizen (females) allied with external interference that fostered Dictatorships and state corruption.
edit on 3-11-2012
by Panic2k11 because: (no reason given)