It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by cartenz
you just have some poorly constructed politically bias website (a website that still uses tables for layout is not credible no matter how you look at it).
You claim the government is illegal, but you have no basis for that other than your own ignorance of the system.
NOW THEREFORE, by these Letters Patent under Our Sign Manual and the Great Seal of Australia --
Originally posted by Sovaka
Wow you are scraping the barrel if you attack the way a website is developed.
Haha, that doesn't lend you any credibility, sorry.
Now, in terms of what I do and do not know, that you will not know. You can however assume all you wish on that topic.
But first thing is first, before you go waiving your patriotical fist in the air and rant at me about questioning my Government (see illegal Government)
... please not the seal on the top of the first page of the Governor-Generals Letters Patent.
Notice it is the corporate seal of Australia... Notice how it ISN'T the Great Seal of Australia?
Now please read the last section of page one... Oh hell don't bother, I know you want me to do you work for you, so I will just quote it here;
NOW THEREFORE, by these Letters Patent under Our Sign Manual and the Great Seal of Australia --
You might start to see the cause for concern over the legitimacy of our Government (see illegal Government).
edit on 30/10/2012 by Sovaka because: Spelling
The reader accepts full responsibility in validating or applying this information in every respect.
Originally posted by cartenz
Im a web developer, so to me the inspect element is important in establishing credibility--perhaps not for you but you are not me, Im yet to run a whois on the site but I'll let you know who owns it if and when I do
Originally posted by cartenz
Well I have my assumptions yes, have you been able to challenge my perception; No.
Originally posted by cartenz
Again with the baseless claim of illegal governemnt
Originally posted by cartenz
I also noticed this little bit of disclaimer in grey-on-grey text (and you questioned my inspect element approach ) after the copyright info...
The reader accepts full responsibility in validating or applying this information in every respect.
The site itself admits its information is fraudulent by including such.
Please go back to your fish and chip shop now.
Originally posted by Sovaka
Originally posted by cartenz
Im a web developer, so to me the inspect element is important in establishing credibility--perhaps not for you but you are not me, Im yet to run a whois on the site but I'll let you know who owns it if and when I do
How important of you. This matters not to the subject or validity of information.
Originally posted by cartenz
Well I have my assumptions yes, have you been able to challenge my perception; No.
Do I wish to challenge them? No.
Originally posted by cartenz
Again with the baseless claim of illegal governemnt
Not baseless at all... It is our job as citizens to question our Government (see illegal Government), it is their job to prove that they are legitimate.
Originally posted by cartenz
I also noticed this little bit of disclaimer in grey-on-grey text (and you questioned my inspect element approach ) after the copyright info...
The reader accepts full responsibility in validating or applying this information in every respect.
The site itself admits its information is fraudulent by including such.
Please go back to your fish and chip shop now.
Just because there is a disclaimer, doesn't mean that it is fraudulent. That is a baseless assertion on your behalf.
And you are strangely obsessed with Fish and Chip shops... were you raised in one?
Originally posted by cartenz
The owner of the site matter a great deal as the bias that it presents.
Originally posted by cartenz
Then be content in my opinion unless you are willing to challenge it
Originally posted by cartenz
Which is proven by the several acts of parliament (both UK and Cth) that transitioned power from a British Military Government to the "Representational Democracy" we have here today.
Originally posted by cartenz
Its not baseless, it is a technique to avoid litigation in any defamation/slander action.
Originally posted by cartenz
No I was under the impression I was in discussion with Pauline Hanson; clearly I was mistaken as any former commonweath member would have a better understanding of political process.
Originally posted by cartenz
This obsession the lunatic fringe have with the PM being unelected is rediculous. The following Australian Prime Ministers were all unelected, as is the case with our democracy: ..........
(a website that still uses tables for layout is not credible no matter how you look at it).
Originally posted by Chadwickus
reply to post by SageBeno
Just so you know, that when you vote in a Federal election, you are voting for your local federal representative.
Prime Ministers are chosen by the members of the party, not by the Australian public.
So you're sort of right in that we didn't vote for Gillard, but we didn't vote for Howard of Rudd either.
For those of you who have never travelled to the west, , cattle guards are horizontal steel
rails placed at fence openings, in dug-out places in the roads adjacent to highways
(sometimes across highways), to prevent cattle from crossing over that area. For some
reason the cattle will not step on the "guards," probably because they fear getting their feet
caught between the rails.
A few months ago, Kevin Rudd received and was reading a report that there were over
10,000 cattle guards in NSW & Queensland. Graziers had protested his proposed changes in
grazing policies, so he ordered the Minister to fire half of the “cattle” guards immediately!!
Before the Minister could respond and presumably try to straighten him out, Minister for
Employment Julia Gillard, intervened with a request that…. before any “cattle” guards were
fired, they be given six months of retraining.