It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Former Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice broke with the majority of her party last night on Fox News, as she tried to hit the brakes on the right wing’s politicization of the recent attack in Libya.
Host Greta Van Susteren asked Rice directly and repeatedly about a set of emails uncovered by Reuters. In what has been dubbed “Benghazi-Gate,” the conservative media has jumped on the emails as definitive proof that the Obama administration has been lying about what it knew and when in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 attack on a diplomatic mission in Benghazi. Rice’s response was likely not what Van Susteren expected:
RICE: But when things are unfolding very, very quickly, it’s not always easy to know what is really going on on the ground. And to my mind, the really important questions here are about how information was collected. Did the various agencies really coordinate and share intelligence in the way that we had hoped, with the reforms that were made after 9/11?
Throughout the interview, Rice highlighted the difficulty that comes in a “fog of war” situation, with multiple stories coming in which need to be processed and verified. Her statements strongly align with the evolution of the Obama administration’s understanding of what happened in Benghazi. Rice also joined current Secretary of State Hillary Clinton in dismissing the big picture importance of the emails from the U.S. Embassy in Tripoli, as a small portion of the overall communication between the mission and the State Department.
Originally posted by Taiyed
The voice of reason.
Republicans need to ask themselves a simple question. Do I want to follow the lead of Condi Rice or Rush Limbaugh?
Originally posted by shadwgirl
reply to post by Vitruvian
I'm sorry, I don't see a racial agenda here. I do believe this video was made before we found out that the whitehouse watched this attack through drones and refused to give help when asked for it during the attack. Please don't make this about race. Colin Powell served his country well and can chose who he wants for president(one of the benefits of being in this country) and Condi Rice is stumping for Romney so I really don't see how their individual agendas are meshing. I do wonder though, what Condi would say if asked the same questions today.
Originally posted by Sissel
She is a FORMER Secretary of State for a reason.
Why do we even care what she has to say anymore?
Originally posted by 3chainz
Um, because she knows what it is like in office under an attack.
Originally posted by Sissel
Originally posted by 3chainz
Um, because she knows what it is like in office under an attack.
And?
People need to move forward in the country, and not back. To get her opinion on anything is a step backwards. No offense to you, maybe it's just me, but how is she even relevant anymore?
Originally posted by 3chainz
reply to post by Sissel
It's relevant when asking a question on policy and such to get someone who knows what they are talking about.
I bet you wouldn't be calling her irrelevant if she was bad mouthing Obama.
edit on 26-10-2012 by 3chainz because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 3chainz
And a drone images do not mean anything. How are drone images supposed to tell if it were a terrorist attack or not?
Condi Rice Pours Cold Water On ‘Benghazi-Gate’,