Times, They Are A Changing , page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 5 times
Topic started on 20-10-2012 @ 07:04 AM by Chadwickus
I'm not too sure how to approach this thread, since I could go a couple of ways with it, one approach could be that of an accusatory nature or it could be of a questioning nature.

I'll start at the beginning and see what happens I guess.

Wind back 12 months (probably more really) and a pro-Obama thread was as rare as hens teeth, in fact there was a ridiculous amount of anti-Obama threads, some crashing through the barrier of absurdity.

Case in point:
www.abovetopsecret.com...

The man was loathed and some people would stoop to any level to have a snipe at him.

Now back to the present and, well, I'm shocked, because it seems as if Obama has gained a bit of support here at ATS, or at least the rhetoric has been toned right down.

There could be a number of reasons for this, is it because the republicans are starting to realise that Romney was the best they could muster up and have been embarrassed into silence?
Is it because the democrats who've been silent the last few years are starting to find their voice again now that it's election time?

Are the members of ATS more susceptible to MSM agendas than they think?

Personally I think it's a bit of all three, but can't say for sure.

So I put the question out there to see if we can work out what exactly is going on here?


reply posted on 20-10-2012 @ 07:24 AM by beezzer
reply to post by Chadwickus



Obama's past 4 years have stunk like fish left out on a counter.

Obama has never had to run on his record. He was a first term senator, then became potus.

His team has assembled a few electronic warriors who can spread disinfo across a wide spectrum.

This is just my tinfoiled opinion, however.


reply posted on 20-10-2012 @ 07:59 AM by Chadwickus
reply to post by beezzer


reply to post by reverandrandy



This would explain his continual unpopularity, but he is pulling it back...

How much would an online campaign really help if he has done such a terrible job the last 4 years?


reply posted on 20-10-2012 @ 08:46 AM by cavalryscout
reply to post by Chadwickus





is it because the republicans are starting to realise that Romney was the best they could muster up and have been embarrassed into silence?


You should know it takes more than a presidential election to silence people around here.

If Romney is the best we could muster up I'm okay with that. If you think Romney is a bad choice it just goes to show how bad of a president Obama really is.Well you will see in about three weeks or so when he is known as President Romney.

I'll attempt to explain it to you. When a person knows he or she is right there isn't a reason to continue proving a point.

The Romney supporters know we are right so there is no need to constantly argue with the silly Obama supporters. Look at the numbers. Look at the polls. Day by day more people are seeing the light, the right, the white way.




reply posted on 20-10-2012 @ 12:19 PM by crankyoldman
Your question has an inadequate framework. 1 year ago the PR system in place is focused on "tearing down" anyone who is in office, by creating as much conflict as possible surrounding everything they do - "Obama bought the wrong brand of pencil!" This will happen in every governmental situation where there is a "selection" process disguised as popular election. The system is built on anger, finger pointing, false polarities and fake moral outrage. So a year ago the PR process was in year three of the four year formula, which is "stir up the masses" and create hate through intense focus on the man in office.

Now, we are in year 4 in the PR process which is all about "rally around the right guy" and so we see people in bunker mode, defending "their guy." The fact that there are more defense posts of the current figure head only reflects the notion that he has been in office and the other has not and those who have posted are more easily influenced by the PR system in place - they defend the known. The PR process - a nice article in the New Yorker a few weeks ago is a nice primer, is about manipulation of the masses and not logic. The system in place has very, very specific dates and times in which things must be released and hammered on and the reactions indicate success or failure in the effort. You are just seeing the last phase in action.

The debates, the kabuki sham that they are, are a key part of the PR process. These are to be vague, open ended events that can be polarized by each "side" thereby creating more discord. Those who control the system have already selected the "winner" but they want two things to happen with the masses. One, the winner's supporters are elated and, two, the losers supporters are pitchfork made. This is the desired outcome, and the ENTIRE election process is about accomplishing this goal.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



A Really Sad Picture That I Saw Today, Left Me Speechless
  Posted 12 days ago with 148 member flags
Fact Check: First Lady\'s False Fairy Tale of Struggle
  Posted 6 days ago with 81 member flags
Coal miners say they were forced to attend Romney event and donate
  Posted 14 days ago with 71 member flags
Stephen King\'s Message
  Posted 10 days ago with 71 member flags
Paul Ryan Exposes Elite Agenda, "Shut Up" Says Banker
  Posted 10 days ago with 40 member flags