It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by PurpleChiten
This is why I said it is at the center point of Mass. It is only now after my reply that you bring up your statement...."if the mass is equally distributed"...or something to that effect. This is why I replied that your answer that the Geometric center point of a Celestial Body is the Center of Gravity...WAS INCORRECT.
Hey...I make mistakes also and at least I will admit them...I had hoped you would be the same.
Not only is a Celestial Body something that rarely has Mass equally distributed....especially in the case of Hard Rocky Planets or Moons...but in the case of Many Planetoids where some exist in PEANUT like shapes...there are more than One center of Gravity.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by PurpleChiten
You still have not learned? I never stated what you just replied I stated. Why not just say...Oh...your right, I forgot about Density of Mass through out the Celestial Body.
If you had just done that...you would earn respect...by continuing your attempt to COVER YOUR TRACKS...you are not doing yourself any favors. Split Infinity
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by Semicollegiate
It is the Reality that Celestial Objects exist at all rather than a Universe filled with Particles that are bouncing off one another that Gravity shows it's Special Effects. Sure we can use equations to figure out an Objects rate of fall and how much a quantity of Mass would weigh on another Planet that is either Lessor or Greater in Mass than Earth but when it comes to the actual Center of a Gravity Well...our known Physical Laws break down.
Split Infinity
No... they don't....
It is quite easy to find the centroid of any three dimensional object using integrals or even deconstructive geometry. The center of gravity would be located at the centroid.
It's quite easy for a 2-dimensional triangle (vertex connected to the midpoint of the opposite side), but becomes a bit more difficult, but not at all impossible for 3 dimensional objects.
....google it if you want to know more.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Actually...the center of Gravity would be located at the center of Mass not the Geometry of any object or even group of objects. Split Infinity
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by PurpleChiten
Actually...the center of Gravity would be located at the center of Mass not the Geometry of any object or even group of objects. Split Infinity
Originally posted by chr0naut
Originally posted by ImaFungi
Originally posted by PurpleChiten
reply to post by ImaFungi
A vacuum does not cancel out gravity, it only takes other matter and the atmosphere out of the equation, producing zero drag. Gravity would be the only force acting on it, but it would still act on it.
in a vacuum,, with no energy,, no matter,, no particles,, in a pure vacuum with nothing but nothing,,,, what gravity is effecting ,, one single object,, in the vacuum?
A vacuum is an absence of macro scale matter, not energy.
There can be various energies in a vacuum.
Vacuums also contain virtual particles which appear and disappear randomly, but only at a quantum scale. This happens because at that small size, we can only speak about the probabilities of particles and their qualities.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
so does space at a quantum scale ( and macro scale) have a non particle/non energetic... composition?
where there are no particles,, no virtual particles,, what is there?
say we make a perfect vacuum with no particles or virtual particles,,, but like you say particles "appear",,, where is it suppose they come from? through the walls of the vacuums container? through infinitesimal singularities of quantum space -time soup?
a vacuum is not void of energy?,,,,, so a vacuum does not always = a vacuum? because there can be a vacuum with this energy,, and a vacuum with that energy,,, what would a hypothetical perfect vacuum be like? what would be its qualities? and level of energy?
what are virtual particles? where do they come from? what are they made of? do they have energy? do they have mass?
Originally posted by chr0naut
Originally posted by ImaFungi
so does space at a quantum scale ( and macro scale) have a non particle/non energetic... composition?
where there are no particles,, no virtual particles,, what is there?
say we make a perfect vacuum with no particles or virtual particles,,, but like you say particles "appear",,, where is it suppose they come from? through the walls of the vacuums container? through infinitesimal singularities of quantum space -time soup?
a vacuum is not void of energy?,,,,, so a vacuum does not always = a vacuum? because there can be a vacuum with this energy,, and a vacuum with that energy,,, what would a hypothetical perfect vacuum be like? what would be its qualities? and level of energy?
what are virtual particles? where do they come from? what are they made of? do they have energy? do they have mass?
All really quite good questions!
Not quantum soup but foam. When you look at the spread of galaxies (like from the Hubble Deep Field) one of the things you notice is that it looks a bit like the bubbles in soap suds. This is believed to be a structure left over from the singularity just after the big bang. In this singularity, all matter and energy that existed was overlaid and in physical contact with all other matter and energy. As it expanded it shaped into a foam with bubble like boundaries and voids. The expansion of the universe then extended this pattern out to the cosmic scales we see today.
Your question about a void without even virtual particles or energies is actually a really good one. For the Higgs field to exist as the thing that gives mass, it requires that the Higgs field be all pervasive, everywhere (or otherwise stuff would fall off the edge of physics when it left the end of the Higgs Field, becoming mass-less). We really don't know of any such space or what its real physics may be.
Originally posted by ImaFungi
ok so the concepts of the higgs field and other fields being all pervasive,,, is an excuse for why virtual particles pop into existence?
are all these fields physical phenomena and truly structured and connected? does that pervasive connection have anything to do with quantum entanglement? like saying a field is an entangled type of particle potential?
what do physicists think the universe is? what do they think the most fundamental constituents of the universe being quantum mechanical wave-particles means? why is there so much of it? why not a quinsfrillionillion times smaller or larger amount of "energy/particles"?
Firstly, gravitation effects are near instantaneous - this is a fact that is non controversial for physicists - but is generally completely unknown for most lay persons. In other words, if gravity is caused by particle interaction or radiation it does not conform to general relativity - this is generally hidden from the lay person because it is an inconvenient truth.
Originally posted by Maslo
reply to post by Amagnon
Firstly, gravitation effects are near instantaneous - this is a fact that is non controversial for physicists - but is generally completely unknown for most lay persons. In other words, if gravity is caused by particle interaction or radiation it does not conform to general relativity - this is generally hidden from the lay person because it is an inconvenient truth.
This is not true. Gravity travels at the speed of light.
en.wikipedia.org...edit on 10/11/12 by Maslo because: (no reason given)
Incorrect - the effect of gravity is almost instantaneous - you need to read your link more carefully. As I said - this isn't something advertised.
This is simply theoretical acrobatics designed to try and maintain a theory which is patently false - ie Special, and General relativity. This idea that 'this only applies between gravity wells moving at constant velocity' is a fabrication purely on inspection.