It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
As part of its “benchmark” health care plan to satisfy ObamaCare’s requirement of the establishment of Essential Health Benefits (EHB’s) in each state, the state of New York has requested that annual doctor visit limits be substituted for lifetime and annual dollar limits in health care plans.
States had until October 1, 2012 to choose an existing health care plan to serve as the minimum “benchmark” plan that would contain the EHB’s as required by ObamaCare. President Obama’s signature health care law gives HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius sole authority to determine the EHB’s for the insurance plans in the state health insurance exchanges. The most controversial EHB to date is the “HHS Mandate,” which requires all employers to provide contraception, sterilization procedures, and abortion-inducing drugs, free of charge, to their employees.
In its letter to the Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMMS), the state of New York wrote:
Removal of Annual/Lifetime Dollar Limits - New York State awaits further federal guidance on the process for substituting dollar limits on benefits with actuarially equivalent quantitative limits (e.g., annual visit limits).
Originally posted by Andcoulter
reply to post by xuenchen
NYS resident here and your thread is complete bull.
If this is just place for people to repose lies they read from REDSTATE then I give up. I already get emails from redstate.
In our written comments to the State, HCFANY urged the State to select the New York State Employee Plans’ Empire Plan, which has more comprehensive benefits than the Oxford plan. Among other differences, the Empire Plan covers adult dental care, and covers some services (like physical therapy and speech therapy) according to medical necessity rather than limiting those services to a set number of visits.
Originally posted by links234
So wait...Obamacare tells the state it needs to set up a minimum level of coverage for its citizens and New York throws around the idea of limiting doctor visits?
How is this the HHS's fault?
Originally posted by xuenchen
Why haven't they not stopped the visit limits ??
Originally posted by xuenchen
Originally posted by Andcoulter
reply to post by xuenchen
NYS resident here and your thread is complete bull.
If this is just place for people to repose lies they read from REDSTATE then I give up. I already get emails from redstate.
not so fast.
this is from the Health Care For All New York website.....
In our written comments to the State, HCFANY urged the State to select the New York State Employee Plans’ Empire Plan, which has more comprehensive benefits than the Oxford plan. Among other differences, the Empire Plan covers adult dental care, and covers some services (like physical therapy and speech therapy) according to medical necessity rather than limiting those services to a set number of visits.
Link to is in the OP. hcfany.org...
Originally posted by beezzer
reply to post by xuenchen
ACA will fundamentally change how we go about business in America. This is only the tip of the iceberg, in my humble opinion.
Originally posted by Andcoulter
Anyone, anyone at all. Just show me the legislation limiting visits to my doctor.
Anyone that can show me that I will actually be limited on doctor's visits from the horse's mouth, please do. Otherwise this whispering crap is so stupid.
The PPACA does allow some limits. There can be a limit on the cost per visit per hour and on the number of visits over a period of days. For example, a person can be limited to three annual visits, but with no cost limits per visit.
Removal of Annual/Lifetime Dollar Limits - New York State awaits further federal guidance on the process for substituting dollar limits on benefits with actuarially equivalent quantitative limits (e.g., annual visit limits).
Originally posted by rickymouse
Some parents think they have to take their kids to the doctors as proof when a kid is sick and misses school for a few days. They are afraid of being called a bad parent. If a kid has a bad cold, they don't need a doctor, they need rest and some tlc. If a kid gets a mild flu they need care at home, if it doesn't get better in a few days then go to the doctor. I don't understand why people think they are required to bring their kids to the doctors for everything, is this expected by the schools.
People also think they need to go to the doctors for proof they are sick if they take time off for sick leave when they get a cold or the flue. Is this required by employers? This kind of stuff brings up insurance premiums. Premiums often paid by the employer. I can see if someone takes a lot of fake sick time, then start worrying about if their sick or just using up sick leave. Sick leave is there in case you get real sick. Most people use it up as soon as it becomes available.......