NASA's Swift Satellite Discovers a New Black Hole in our Galaxy, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 15 times
Topic started on 6-10-2012 @ 03:31 AM by badfish420

NASA's Swift Satellite Discovers a New Black Hole in our Galaxy


www.nasa.gov
NASA's Swift satellite recently detected a rising tide of high-energy X-rays from a source toward the center of our Milky Way galaxy. The outburst, produced by a rare X-ray nova, announced the presence of a previously unknown stellar-mass black hole.

"Bright X-ray novae are so rare that they're essentially once-a-mission events and this is the first one Swift has seen," said Neil Gehrels, the mission's principal investigator, at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md. "This is really something we've been waiting for."

An X-ray nova is a short-lived X-ray source that
(visit the link for the full news article)

edit on 6-10-2012 by badfish420 because: Fix title
edit on 6-10-2012 by badfish420 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 6-10-2012 @ 04:14 AM by andy06shake
reply to post by SkepticEzzy



"I hope the black hole leads to a better place!"

We all hope that pal!

"i hope it leads to justin bieber wonderland!"

Get help mate, please! If there is a hell im 100% sure Justin Bieber's music plays continuously!!! LoL LoL LoL
edit on 6-10-2012 by andy06shake because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 6-10-2012 @ 05:40 AM by PatrickGarrow17


reply posted on 6-10-2012 @ 08:34 AM by watchitburn
reply to post by PatrickGarrow17



And the Super-massive Black Hole at the center of the Milky Way is in it's dormant cycle right now.
When it starts actively consuming stuff again we should get a good show.


reply posted on 6-10-2012 @ 09:58 AM by ninjas4321
reply to post by badfish420



Interesting thought do you think that we could possibly use black holes to dispose of our waste it would be kind of like the garbage disposal in your sink all you have to do is send a rocket full of waste into it and it disappears
Or it gets sent to another part of the universe for someone else to deal with
S&F
edit on 6-10-2012 by ninjas4321 because: (no reason given)
edit on 6-10-2012 by ninjas4321 because: (no reason given)
edit on 6-10-2012 by ninjas4321 because: (no reason given)



reply posted on 6-10-2012 @ 10:21 AM by Arbitrageur
Originally posted by badfish420

NASA's Swift Satellite Discovers a New Black Hole in our Galaxy


www.nasa.gov
The outburst, produced by a rare X-ray nova, announced the presence of a previously unknown stellar-mass black hole.
The term "stellar mass" apparently means it's the mass of a single star, and not some kind of supermassive black hole with a mass of many stars.

I read the article and apparently it hasn't been long enough since the event for them to make a good estimate of the mass yet. I'm always curious about how massive black holes are.

There could be lots of stellar mass black holes we don't know about. This one can be seen because of a companion star, but if there's no companion star or other matter being sucked into the gravity well, the black holes may be able to hide from us. Anybody wonder how many black holes there are in our galaxy? I don't think we really know the answer.


reply posted on 6-10-2012 @ 10:39 AM by St Udio
reply to post by Arbitrageur



your correct... the words describe a solar mas black hole, but in a familiar place, the core of the Galaxy
some 26,000 light years distant.

the wording seems to imply that the high energy/ short lived burst might have just been a hiccup by the massive Sagg A. Black Hole known to be hunkered down at the galactic core.


i reported a few weeks ago that NASA has verified that there is an increased ammount of radiation being emmitted by the Core BH

...Naselsky said:
'We have observed a very unique emission of radio radiation from the centre of our galaxy, the Milky Way.


'By using different methods to separate the signal for very broad range of wavelengths, we have been able to determine the spectrum of the radiation.

'The radiation originates from synchrotron emission - electrons and positrons circulating at high energies around the lines of the Magnetic Field in the centre of the galaxy, and there are quite strong indications that it could come from dark matter.'

Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... 25sHQYdvp

*Planck satellite picks up beams of radiation from centre of Milky Way which could prove existence of 'dark matter'
*Researchers at Niels Bohr Institute say radiation is either proof - or something currently unknown to physics

By Eddie Wrenn

PUBLISHED: 04:03 EST, 5 September 2012 | UPDATED: 04:03 EST, 5 September 2012


Read more: www.dailymail.co.uk... 25sHhaoyz



this newest data suggests that the time/distance of all these high energy pulses and synchotron emmissions are reaching our area of the galaxy from an event that took place more than 26,000 years ago...
lets see if this enery barrage continues to increase and become the Cosmic Event that cycles every 26k years of the Earths' precession cycle and is foretold in the 5,120 year Maya calendar (cycle #5) that is fufilled on 12-21-'12
? cosmic superwave ? on the way or what?



t


reply posted on 7-10-2012 @ 09:16 AM by stumason
Originally posted by Ben81
About time !
been there the whole time at the center of our galaxy
all constellations are spiraling around it (giant universal clock)
the secrets of who we are is within the stars !


This is a different BH. One of stellar mass, not the big sucker in the Galactic centre..

reply to
post by PatrickGarrow17



BH don't go round sucking everything in. A stellar mass BH, for example, will have no more of a gravitational effect on it's surroundings than the Star it was formed of, as it consists of the same mass. For example, if our Sun turned into a BH right now, the only difference we'd see would be the lack of sunlight. We'd still orbit exactly the same round and round, ad infinitum...


reply posted on 7-10-2012 @ 01:23 PM by Vilkata
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by Ben81
About time !
been there the whole time at the center of our galaxy
all constellations are spiraling around it (giant universal clock)
the secrets of who we are is within the stars !


This is a different BH. One of stellar mass, not the big sucker in the Galactic centre..

reply to
post by PatrickGarrow17



BH don't go round sucking everything in. A stellar mass BH, for example, will have no more of a gravitational effect on it's surroundings than the Star it was formed of, as it consists of the same mass. For example, if our Sun turned into a BH right now, the only difference we'd see would be the lack of sunlight. We'd still orbit exactly the same round and round, ad infinitum...


'Black-Holeness' is determined by the existance of an event horizon, which is true even with a stellar mass black hole. The density, not the mass, determines gravitation. The mass of the sun, in an incredibly compact space, would at a certain distance have the gravitation to withhold light, and heat.


reply posted on 8-10-2012 @ 03:38 AM by stumason
reply to post by Vilkata



Er, no. You are confused.

Mass determines gravity, density just relates to the mass and volume of said object and has no bearing on the event horizon.

In any case, a singularities density is infinite. The mass determines the size of the event horizon. Like I said, the Sun could turn into a BH and we'd be unaffected, gravitationally, it would just be dark. You're only in danger from a BH once you approach and cross the event horizon, at which point no amount of energy can get you out of trouble, whereas at any point up to the event horizon, you can escape the BH, provided you always had the required thrust to escape the gravitational pull of the pre-BH stellar object, of course.

Simply put, just because something is a BH, doesn't mean it suddenly turns into a galactic hoover. It retains the same gravitational effects as the pre-BH object. Of course, if it consumes any matter and it's mass increases, then so will the gravity and it may pull in more mass then grow, but if it doesn't do so, it will merrily be on it's way and then evaporate over time...


reply posted on 8-10-2012 @ 03:38 AM by stumason
reply to post by AfterInfinity



Nothing...

It's just X-rays and fairly weak one's at that given the distance.
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Israel angered over IAEA vote on nuclear arsenal
  Posted 13 days ago with 79 member flags
Neil Armstrong dead at age 82 - report
  Posted 17 days ago with 63 member flags
Judge orders release of detained Marine veteran
  Posted 19 days ago with 58 member flags
Birds hold \'funerals\' for dead
  Posted 10 days ago with 55 member flags
TSA agents swarm Ron Paul\'s plane, demand explosives check
  Posted 11 days ago with 47 member flags
Mysterious Changes in Ocean Salt Spur NASA Expedition
  Posted 1 days ago with 36 member flags
Ga. Murder Case Uncovers Terror Plot by Soldiers
  Posted 15 days ago with 32 member flags