It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Solar incidence angle: 57 degrees, with the Sun about
33 degrees above the horizon
Originally posted by Arken
Originally posted by gortex
I think you need the eye of faith to believe that they are upright and casting shadows and not just natural Geology .. err .. Marology ? .. either way it looks flat to me
Hmmm: Flat rocks that cast a 35 meters shadow?
No. Something else maybe.
Originally posted by Unity_99
Photo tampering is something so evil its hard to even stand by and watch this manipulation of humanity. But please note the waves, of the "standing water". This is actual real water. I know that as an artist.
Originally posted by Unity_99
Photo tampering is something so evil its hard to even stand by and watch this manipulation of humanity. But please note the waves, of the "standing water". This is actual real water. I know that as an artist.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by Arken
On the news this morning they announced Nasa has plans to build a base on the 'dark side of the moon". I think the Moon and mars are both covered in artifacts and that mars has multitudes of life both former and current.
Originally posted by ArMaP
Originally posted by Unity_99
Photo tampering is something so evil its hard to even stand by and watch this manipulation of humanity. But please note the waves, of the "standing water". This is actual real water. I know that as an artist.
Those are dunes, it looks like being an artist is not a sure way of knowing what you're seeing.
If it was water we would see some transparency and reflectivity, besides some difference between the water and the dry areas.
That's not a nice thing to say, specially to someone you don't know, but it shows the type of person you are; if someone doesn't shake their head in agreement of your ideas then it must be because they "stand up for the Nazis controlling our planet". Do you know that that's the type of reasoning the Nazis and the Fascists (like the ones the ruled Portugal for 48 years, until April 25, 1974) used to find enemies everywhere and excuses to act against them, even if they hadn't done a thing?
Originally posted by Unity_99
I know you stand up for the nazi's controlling our planet,
OK, lets discuss that. Why they're not likely to be dunes? They look the same in different photos taken at different times, while water doesn't do that (at least that's what I noticed in other photos, as you haven't provided a photo ID for the photos you posted, so I cannot see if there are more photos of that area), they show some texture while water doesn't, they have shapes that are characteristic of dunes, not of waves, they lack the reflectivity of the water, they lack the transparency of the water, water in shallow areas doesn't look blue. Those are the main reasons I think those I dunes.
but they're not likely to be dunes.
What do you mean by "inversion of water"? And what signs of photo tampering do you see?
Due to the amount of inversion of water and photo tampering done, I don't believe your right.
Following what the opposition to those that supposedly "lie and tamper" doesn't mean that there's critical thinking at work, it may show a sheep following a different shepherd. And no, I don't follow what NASA says just because they say, I always have my own interpretation of what I see, but most of the times it coincides with what NASA says. Critical thinking doesn't mean you have to choose something that isn't the official position about something.
And on a site where people are searching for truth, accepting answers from those who lie and tamper with evidence, is not exactly critical thinking.
Yes, everything points to water flowing in Mars' past, but I have yet to see evidences of water flowing today, although I have seen several signs of flows that look liquid (NASA says that some of those are different coloured dust, but I don't think so), nothing points to that supposed liquid being water, although it's highly likely. Water isn't blue, and Mars is full of a very thin blueish dust, visible in many photos from satellite and from the ground. The colours in those images you posted are not real colours, they are approximations made with red, green+blue for green and what they call a "synthetic blue" made with the green+blue image multiplied by 2 minus 30% of the red channel.
Water One Flowed?! Well the pictures reveal blue, waves and white spray, pretty odd ghost to be formed in the minerals if you ask me.
No problems with that, just show us a clear example of it.
Water is STILL FLOWING.
Only fools follow what looks like a leader without questions, specially if they do not really know it or if it's some organisation.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
The "authorities" tell us then we can believe without looking foolish until then we must deny and follow.