The US Government Murdered Their Own Ambassador

page: 1
53
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join
+20 more 
posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 03:52 AM
link   
Its obvious isnt it?

The Wall Street Journal is the weakest link.

Now use logic. Why is the Wall Street Journal (owned by Murdoch ) giving an interview to an obscure 'film maker' when nobody had heard of him or his movie? Why would they do that? Think about it.

Why then would the AP interview the guy? Why would it be dubbed into arabic and shown on Egyptian television? We know that the Muslim Brotherhood is in the pocket of the United States.

The offensive clip was aired in Egypt on the channel Al Nas. Al Nas is a station founded in 2006 by a Saudi businessman. Think about that for a second. Why would a Saudi businessman start an Egyptain Islamic TV Station? Think about it.

Now back to the mysterious Sam Basile. Does he not remind you of the mysterious pathetic crim that the US Government used as a patsy for the fake Iranian 'terror plot' to blow up the Saudi and Israeli Embassies? How stupid does the US Government think people are?


Though many key documents from the U.S. District Court case remain sealed, a June 2010 sentencing transcript provides an account of Nakoula’s cooperation with federal investigators in Los Angeles (and how his prison sentence was reduced as a result).

cannonfire.blogspot.com.au...

Would you not agree that its a touch suspicious that Basile is a snitch that got a reduced sentence for working with the Feds? Think about that.

Back to The Wall Street Journal, the weakest link, why is nobody questioning their role in all of this? Why would they interview an obscure loser like Basile?

These fake news stories created by the US Government are becoming absurd. Its telling.

edit on 17-9-2012 by freemarketsocialist because: (no reason given)




posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 04:36 AM
link   
I have thought about it and I came to the same conclusions you did. My wife didn't even bother to look into the matter. She heard the story once briefly in passing and knew it was a false flag.



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 04:39 AM
link   

Originally posted by Socrato
I have thought about it and I came to the same conclusions you did. My wife didn't even bother to look into the matter. She heard the story once briefly in passing and knew it was a false flag.


Yeah, I know what you mean. They are so obvious it seems like they dont even care anymore.


+2 more 
posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 05:05 AM
link   
reply to post by freemarketsocialist
 


It obvious isnt it?
Of course it isn't, otherwise you wouldn't have had to go through eight assumptions to reach an extraordinarily questionable conclusion.

Now use logic. Why is the Wall Street Journal (owned by Murdoch ) giving an interview to an obscure 'film maker' when nobody had heard of him or his movie? Why would they do that?
Because it's a hot news story and that's what newspapers do?

Why then would the AP interview the guy?
Because AP reports on hot news stories just like the Journal?

Why would it be dubbed into arabic and shown on Egyptian television?
Because AP is an international news service?

We know that the Muslim Brotherhood is in the pocket of the United States.
How in the name of all that's holy do you know that? That claim requires some evidence, don't you think?

Why would a Saudi businessman start an Egyptain Islamic TV Station? Think about it.
Perhaps to make money?

Now back to the mysterious Sam Basile. Does he not remind you of the mysterious pathetic crim that the US Government used as a patsy for the fake Iranian 'terror plot' to blow up the Saudi and Israeli Embassies?
Actually he reminds me of my Uncle Morris.

Would you not agree that its a touch suspicious that Basile is a snitch that got a reduced sentence for working with the Feds? Think about that.
There's nothing to think about. That's what happens to almost all cooperating witnesses.

Back to The Wall Street Journal, the weakest link, why is nobody questioning their role in all of this? Why would they interview an obscure loser like Basile?
I've already told you why. Besides, they're no friend of Obama.

These fake news stories created by the US Government are becoming absurd. Its telling.
You've gone to the trouble of posting a long thread with absolutely no evidence, or even any logical reason for believing this. And even if it were true, you've provided absolutely no evidence to support your headline.



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 05:15 AM
link   
the u.s murders its own people all the time... nothing new in that... human life means absolutely nothing to them...



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 05:21 AM
link   
I think this is what it's all about....Libya used to be our best buds and we gave them chemical weapons to keep a Russian or Chinese ground force from coming close to Libya.

Chemical Weapons Convention said all chemical weapons were supposed to be destroyed by April 2012. Since those were American chemical weapons....we gave Libya a bunch of brief cases full of money to destroy the chemical weapons over there. Shortly after Libya had all that cash Senator McCain was over there trying to get Libya to buy military hardware instead with that money......and that money made its rounds into US political hands...defense industry hands..

So how to make more money? Destabilize Libya and turn them into a mess to make more money. Their chemical weapons....technically US Chemical weapons....are still out there spread across all of Libya.

The Ambassador sent to Libya was hand picked because he was a clueless clutz and didn't know the big picture and what was really going on. They wanted a clueless clutz over there with no security so he could get killed....and they could justify their next rounds of making money.

There should be NO Embassy or foreign Ambassadors in Libya until they destroy their entire chemical weapons stockpile. Eventually these people playing the Libyans to make money are going to get the crazy to snap in Libya and those chemical weapons will get used.....again it seems this is the goal of the big power brokers of the world.....so they can make more money.



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 05:24 AM
link   
reply to post by charles1952
 





Because it's a hot news story and that's what newspapers do?


It was not a "hot news story" at all. Nobody knew who this guy was. So lets start there. Why are you saying it was a "hot news story". Why? What are you talking about? A movie that nobody is paying attention to is a "hot news story" for the Wall Street Journal? Again, what on earth are you talking about?

postscript- and that was long? You have gone to more trouble with your response than I went to for the opening post.
edit on 17-9-2012 by freemarketsocialist because: (no reason given)

edit- and this



I've already told you why. Besides, they're no friend of Obama.

They are no friends of Obama? That makes no sense at all. What are you trrying to say?
edit on 17-9-2012 by freemarketsocialist because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 05:38 AM
link   
reply to post by freemarketsocialist
 

The trailer was posted on YouTube two months ago. So if the Journal story was before that, I'd have to rethink my position, but I'd like to know what that interview was about. So, I'll stick with my position until you can tell me a little more. Did you find the rest of my post to be accurate?

postscript- and that was long? You have gone to more trouble with your response than I went to for the opening post.
You're quite welcome. It's for a good cause.



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 06:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by freemarketsocialist
 

The trailer was posted on YouTube two months ago. So if the Journal story was before that, I'd have to rethink my position, but I'd like to know what that interview was about. So, I'll stick with my position until you can tell me a little more. Did you find the rest of my post to be accurate?

postscript- and that was long? You have gone to more trouble with your response than I went to for the opening post.
You're quite welcome. It's for a good cause.


The interview was before the attack.

So an obscure movie is made by a pathetic small time criminal and nobody pays any attention to it. Then The Wall Street Journal gives this loser an interview because its a "hot news story"? It makes no sense. The Wall Street Journal interviewed this guy for a reason. What reason?



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 06:17 AM
link   
reply to post by freemarketsocialist
 

I'm guessing that the interview was prompted by seeing a wildly controversial video on YouTube which was posted two months before the attack.

What interview are you talking about? Where can I find it? I'm perfectly willing to change my view, if I have some evidence to suggest I should.



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 06:56 AM
link   

Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by freemarketsocialist
 

I'm guessing that the interview was prompted by seeing a wildly controversial video on YouTube which was posted two months before the attack.

What interview are you talking about? Where can I find it? I'm perfectly willing to change my view, if I have some evidence to suggest I should.


Yeah, the Wall Street Journal says that Basile emailed the clip to news organizations around the world. Thats how they knew about it apparently.



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 08:43 AM
link   

Originally posted by Expat888
the u.s murders its own people all the time... nothing new in that... human life means absolutely nothing to them...
Really? Thanks for the insight. I thought they did that in Asia and have been for thousands of years. Is that true?



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 11:52 AM
link   
I would work for you guys. Money is money. And there is no beating you. ASIO are losers and I wouldnt work for them. I would work for you guys though. I would make an awesome shill.

edit- I like that guy from the A Team movie. Very ubermensch. The CIA has style. And these morons deserve all they get at the end of the day dont they. Could they be dumber? I doubt it. Im no genius but like I said, I would be an awesome shill.
edit on 17-9-2012 by freemarketsocialist because: (no reason given)

edit- Im just messing with ya.
I wouldnt work for you either. You are cooler than those ASIO losers though. I bet the CIA makes fun of those ASIO idiots all the time.
edit on 17-9-2012 by freemarketsocialist because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 01:55 PM
link   
reply to post by charles1952
 


I, too, am interested in seeing this interview. Help us out OP!



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 02:04 PM
link   
i wish when constructing an inflammatory title, you might have hard evidence. i see more and more outragous claims backed up by speculative opinion on ATS, and frankly, it's becoming boring, and not even worth reading.



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 03:58 PM
link   
reply to post by freemarketsocialist
 


I agree with the OP. This was all orchestrated by intelligence agencies.
They really want to spark a larger religious based war - one that isn't truly about religion but
uses it as a tool to create the conflagration.



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 04:01 PM
link   
It's so obvious...your assertion in the title of this thread...that this may be the first time I've posted not to challenge a thread but to say yes...I agree.

and apparently everyone in his administration is working to cover up this crime. and when faced with testimony from people in a far better situation to recreate the event...they come up with their own opinion.

almost as if they now what happened and are covering it up.
edit on 17-9-2012 by michaelbrux because: (no reason given)
edit on 17-9-2012 by michaelbrux because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 04:08 PM
link   
STAR AND FLAG. Nice to see people speaking the truth without any fear. **** the Dracos!!!



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 04:23 PM
link   
This SAM BACILE( BASSIEL) looks very much like IMBACILE , but with SAM in front????
online.wsj.com...

CRS...Cause reaction solution.
The adjenda been more WAR???
gravitor
edit on 17-9-2012 by gravitor because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 17 2012 @ 04:34 PM
link   
Something I have kept hearing the last few days.

www.foxnews.com...

The supposed mob was no where near the embassy/consulate. The mob that was incited by this video. This video with such a murky back story, it almost sounds like it was intentionally done that way. Who operates that way?

So if the mob was not near the place, who went in to kill these guys? Who knew they were there? From all accounts, the hit was organized. Who operates that way?

Apparently the ambassador was an Arabist. A good guy, as far as the average Libyan is concerned.
Why would they want him gone?





new topics

top topics



 
53
<<   2  3 >>

log in

join