posted on Sep, 13 2012 @ 12:09 PM
Just had a cool "what if" experience that I thought to share with ATS. Not sure how well I'll be able to describe this one, but I'll do my best.
People on ATS often comment that the worlds basic problems could be solved if TPTB really wanted to. That it's simply not in their interest to do so.
Often greed is cited as the main reason. I never liked this outlook. Something seemed to be missing.
So I decided to run a thought experiment through that the world's basic problems could be solved, but wanted to see what fit in my mind as to an
intent by TPTB. I see it more as control, than mere numbers/greed. I look to the "Arab Spring" and realize the main catalyst for this event was food
insecurity. Sure, a guy lit himself on fire, but the real reason was boiling to a point for a long while...
I then look at the world as a whole, and the monetary/financial policies which have been put in place. They're entirely unsustainable. That means the
end result is controllable. You just have to shape around the responses to these policies and everything is set!
My idea is that TPTB are causing a controlled global collapse of the economy. The thought is that the weaker countries, which are your enemies, will
be allowed to be toppled from within. Then you influence the order that comes about next. The weaker friendlies are given support, and stay afloat.
Stronger countries can play down their strength, and allow a certain percentage of fear within their own communities to keep us all herded together.
All the while, we're really strong if you realize the numbers are practically meaningless at this stage of the game. What matters is the belief in
these numbers or lack their of.
So we take the hit to wipe-out our weaker enemy. We allow the easy problems a delay in being solved, in order to manage more complex problems in the
short term. After the NWO is rolled out, introduce the technology, and put in place the correct policies which give way to a solving of the world's
basic needs.
What do you guys think?
edit on 13-9-2012 by moniesisfun because: (no reason given)