In my case, I take good and evil as descriptions of acts on the positive and negative sides... While an evil action may have some good come out of it,
that doesn't change that the act is evil. Same with good. Some good actions have evil things happen because of it, but it doesn't change the good
action to evil because of that.
It's probably picking it a little too much apart which gets away from the original message.
That is exactly what I'm saying...different wording, but same essential meaning. And when all emotional bias is removed from it, from a purely
objective viewpoint, anyone will see that's right.
Sorry, but it's true. Good and evil are not absolute, everyone should know that much. So what does it depend on? Emotion. Figure it out.