It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Researchers working at MIT have successfully manipulated the content of a rat’s dream by replaying an audio cue that was associated with the previous day’s events, namely running through a maze (what else). The breakthrough furthers our understanding of how memory gets consolidated during sleep — but it also holds potential for the prospect of “dream engineering.”
Working at MIT’s Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, neuroscientist Matt Wilson was able to accomplish this feat by exploiting the way the brain’s hippocampus encodes self-experienced events into memory. Scientists know that our hippocampus is busy at work replaying a number of the day’s events while we sleep — a process that’s crucial for memory consolidation. But what they did not know was whether or not these “replays” could be influenced by environmental cues.
Originally posted by headorheart
Why would the average human want this?
I could understand those who are mentally disturbed by nightmares of past heartache being freed from that pain. However, this frightens me. It is much too close to achieving mind control.
Originally posted by solarstorm
Originally posted by headorheart
Why would the average human want this?
I could understand those who are mentally disturbed by nightmares of past heartache being freed from that pain. However, this frightens me. It is much too close to achieving mind control.
If it means participating in orgy dreams every night, sign me up.
Originally posted by trysts
Since it's impossible to "see" what anyone dreams, I wish the article would have been more specific about the limits of neuro-science, instead of just getting kids to think the movie, "Inception", is anything but a fantasy. Using audio, or electric pulse signals on animal's brains for experiments in behavioral control is nothing new. In my view it's unnecessary cruelty.
So yes, human volunteers should be next.
Originally posted by Unity_99
Originally posted by trysts
Since it's impossible to "see" what anyone dreams, I wish the article would have been more specific about the limits of neuro-science, instead of just getting kids to think the movie, "Inception", is anything but a fantasy. Using audio, or electric pulse signals on animal's brains for experiments in behavioral control is nothing new. In my view it's unnecessary cruelty.
So yes, human volunteers should be next.
Inception isn't complete fantasy. Lots of us know that. They have trained agents in many things.
However this obviously relating to use of HAARP, nano technology and/or implants.
And no one has the right to control dreams.
These included the nature of psychological states compared to “mind reading,” the nature of neurophysiological and neural activity, and barriers to identification of mental states and intentions.
This complex set of interrelated factors must be understood and accounted for to detect a psychological state—that is, to “read” a mind—using any technology.
Inexpensive, noninvasive endocrine assays (Dickerson and Kemeny, 2004) and noninvasive, high-density electroencephalographic and functional brain imaging technology with high spatial and temporal resolution of brain processes have advanced rapidly.
www.nap.edu...
Several of the cognitive science applications that have the most enormous ethical implication (as described by Huang and Kosal) contain advances that are being made even faster than publicly thought. These advances do not include lie detection technology, whose potential to invade the privacy of individuals is an unrealistic scientific possibility (I'm waiting for a theory of mind to be developed first!). They do include an approach to near-real-time, multimodal cognitive measurements to "watch people think" while under stress (an achievable goal scientifically) not under duress (an unachievable goal scientifically).
www.thebulletin.org...