It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Did nasa really send astronauts to the moon?

page: 11
12
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 08:59 AM
link   
reply to post by bjarneorn
 


Should be grumpy little baby under your user name!

There is plenty of evidence to say we went there YOU choose to ignore it because it pee's on your parade.

NASA kept detailed logs of the objects and activity by the astronauts around the landing sites.

Craters etc photographed around the landing sites by the Astronauts can now be seen on the LRO pictures of the landing sites.

These objects are to small to be seen by any telescope but can be matched up with the Apollo pictures even the tacks left by the Astronauts can be matched as posted before see below.





posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 09:51 AM
link   
Many people think it was a hoax and many do not that's for certain, some people do not know who to trust. It could be said that the HAM operators eves dropping were; in a sense a 3rd party independent that can verify or deny...that being the case; In July of 1969 a Louisvillian by the name of Larry Baysinger accomplished an amazing feat. He independently detected signals from the Apollo 11 astronauts on the lunar surface.

This external link, is the full story and audio captured by Larry Baysinger; an independent 3rd party HAM operator eves dropping and recording the Apollo 11 mission.
I submit to you the following: legacy.jefferson.kctcs.edu...



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 09:57 AM
link   
reply to post by denver22
 


Yes, i understaind the radiation a bit better now so thank you. Im not some ignorant fool thats close minded to any logical explanation. And man enough to say this does sound logical.
As far as the nasa telling a clear and obvious lie however, that had nothing to really do with the radiation but rather a bit of vidoe i referanced. I still havent found a copy of that video but assure you it is real. Im sure its in some of the hoax compilations but they can get quit long and my phones web browser will not let me FF youtube videos. I just dont have the time to watch them all. But im keeping a close eye out and again ask if anyone has seen or knows of it than i would appreciate a link. Im sure at some point i will find it. You can atleast read the discription i gave contained in the post you quoted me from and get an idea of how it goes down. Its one bit i have not seen explained.
Once more i thank you though for explaining the radiation clearly.



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 10:17 AM
link   
reply to post by Kandinsky
 


First what makes you think one man made rocket fuel or that even if he did he had to know the truth? After all before we ever sent a man to the moon we sent unmanned rockets into orbit,even a chimp.. The rocket fuel was already being made before after and durring this.
As for building it, yes your correct. One man did one job another man did another and so on.. After all thats how houses go up. I have personaly been on a crew that put up an entire house in just around two weeks. These guys had four months at the very least. Thats if it was startd the day the plan to go to the moon was officialy announced. Im sure we can agree things like this get planed out well in advance before the public is ever told so we dont know just how long they had. Could have been years.

edit on 29-8-2012 by BennyTheBlade because: post came out blank..

edit on 29-8-2012 by BennyTheBlade because: this time only half my post showed.. Something fishy going on here



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 10:24 AM
link   
reply to post by BennyTheBlade
 
The point was it takes more than '5 men' to build, fuel and launch Apollo rockets. Each component added more people, more paper-trail, more employees, more chitter-chatter over family dinners etc etc. It had Congressmen trying to get on the gravy-train so their voters got tenders to supply the little stuff like washers and specialised gaskets. Not in one State either, but lots. Scientists communicating. TV crews filming. People being interviewed. One big mutha of a rocket being fired into the sky whilst the world watched.

This can't be reduced to '5 guys.'



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 10:28 AM
link   
reply to post by bjarneorn
 


Well you yourself advocate critical thinking. I critically think that what you say is bs. for the rather simple reason that you have nothing backing it up. NASA however has a huge montain of evidence for their claim of a succesfull moon landing. Not only that, the evidence in question is the most critically analysed and most scrutinized in human history. So...
Nasa 1 - You 0



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 10:32 AM
link   
reply to post by Kandinsky
 


wow your still missing my point compleatly. First the rocket fuel wasnt made by one man and it was already being made anyway. And obviously it didnt need to be made by anyone "in the know". My point isnt that it only took so few people to do every last thing involved in flying a rocket full of men to the moon, my point was that not every last person and their dead grandma needed to know every detail. In this case not everyone knew it was fake. Only a select few would need to know that.



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 10:37 AM
link   
reply to post by PsykoOps
 


your being selective in where you give out points. Seeing only what you want to see. The video i referanced previously shows a clear lie told by nasa about how far they actualy were at the time. This has yet to be explained by you, them or anyone else. So id say nasa-1 us-1



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 10:41 AM
link   
reply to post by BennyTheBlade
 
Benny, they had years not '4 months' and started in1960.

I've worked years in construction as a roofer (no longer) and it's nothing like the scale of a national project with a budget of millions and a workforce amounting to tens of thousands. Honestly my friend, you make it sound like they were going shopping and hid round a corner.



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 10:47 AM
link   
reply to post by Kandinsky
 


well the time they had was only in referance to building a set. So you only helped my agrument in saying just a few guys could build a set in that given time. Thank you. I have worked as a framer, a drywaller and too as a roofer. A few years is a long time



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 10:54 AM
link   
reply to post by BennyTheBlade
 


You mean this one?



If someone can find that please post it. Im still looking.


Well let's call the press then!



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 11:12 AM
link   
reply to post by PsykoOps
 


something like that. I would be happy to provide you with three differant links to it but you will find youtube deleted all three of those. Only furthering my beleif that it was a legitimate goof on nasas part that was never ment to be seen. I gain nothing here from making up fictitious videos if thats what you are getting at. As i said my phone browser and yt dont get along to well. Once i have some time on a computer to do more indepth searching i will find said video and im guessing you will ignore it once its posted. The lack of a proper link atm makes it an easy target and your feeding off that. Its ok, i understaind. Your mind wont allow you to give anyone the bennefit of the doubt and take my word it exists. But like i said, im sure if i find a copy and post it you will be nowhere to be found.



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 11:16 AM
link   
By all means post the video if it excists. I'm actually fairly sure we've seen that video here before thought.

By the way I really really hope you're not referring to this. We've seen it and it was shot down in flames ages ago
Took me all 2secs to find it again but took awhile to watch the nonsense again for laughs

edit on 29/8/2012 by PsykoOps because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 11:33 AM
link   
reply to post by PsykoOps
 


I know for a fact its been seen here before. After all this is where i got my links to it that have since been deleted. However, everytime it has been posted here there has never been on explanation, not even an attempted explanation to why nasa would do this. Atleast not that i have seen. Thats why it stands out to me. Once i find a working copy rest assured i will post. My search for it led me to quite a few other sites and forums that also bring up this video and its explained in detail but seems the videos were the same deleted links. I would be happy to share some of those that describe the same thing i did though if you truly dont think it ever existed.



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 11:36 AM
link   
Well I guess you missed the part that said "NASA didn't do it" It was the idiot Sib hoaxer who did it with editing and basically lying.



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 11:44 AM
link   
The only reason I have heard for a "fake" moon landing was so we could "beat the Russians". Well any form of research would show that the Russians were no where near putting a man on the moon.

The Russians booster (N1) was a complete disaster. The Saturn V on the other hand was way ahead. To add to that, in the US.. there was ONLY the Saturn V. In Russia, there were (if I recall correctly) two or three competing programs for a solid booster rocket.

Ask yourself this. If it was such a race. Such an important race that we had to "fake" it, which involved launching several Apollo missions over the course of 14 years. That's a pretty elaborate hoax to simply "fool" someone.

Did we gain anything over the Soviets by beating them? There has to be a legitimate REASON for a hoax.



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 11:55 AM
link   
reply to post by BennyTheBlade
 





So add two more to the list. 15 had to know




Benny how many people do you think were in mission controll alone answer me that?
edit on 29-8-2012 by denver22 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 11:58 AM
link   
reply to post by PsykoOps
 


well i sat through ten mins of that video before my phone browser refused to continue loading. I also than read quite a bit of comments. Thats not the video i refer to. This video your talking about seems more about how big would the earth be at that distance. Im talking about one that nasa clearly stated the camera was against the glass and the view was all of the visible eather but we than come to find it was farther back and the view we see is only partial earth inside the round window. But if infact that segment happens in the last 4 mins (i dont recall any of the first ten being part of the video im talking about) than explain for me why they said something that wasnt true. Save me the time in reading all the replys just to hope ts the correct thing.



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 12:04 PM
link   
reply to post by denver22
 


selectivly reading only the parts you want to hear much? What does the number of folks in mission control have to do with who "needed to know"? i already stated that mission control could have easily sat and watched the same as the american people did beleiving what the saw was real.



posted on Aug, 29 2012 @ 12:10 PM
link   
reply to post by BennyTheBlade
 


Yes that part is in the last minutes of the video. Also you should read that whole thread.
NASA never said that the camera was against the class btw




top topics



 
12
<< 8  9  10    12  13  14 >>

log in

join