It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
It’s not just this year that Chicago outpaced Afghanistan in terms of deaths by violence, either. Since 2001 more than 5,000 people have been killed by gunfire in Chicago, and during that same period 2,000 U.S. troops were killed in Afghanistan, Chicago’s WBEZ 91.5 reported.
As the sun rose Sunday, New York City hit a remarkable milestone, recording just 193 murders in the first six months of the year. In that same span, more than 250 murders were recorded in Chicago—a city just one third as large.
Originally posted by followtheevidence
reply to post by jhn7537
Might have something to do with having the 3rd highest unemployment rate in the nation?
Are most of the shootings drug related? Gang related?
Idk ... stay safe in any case.
Originally posted by jhn7537
Originally posted by followtheevidence
reply to post by jhn7537
Might have something to do with having the 3rd highest unemployment rate in the nation?
Are most of the shootings drug related? Gang related?
Idk ... stay safe in any case.
Unemployment surely has played a role in it (no statistics to go off of), but the majority of the violence happens on the South/West sides of Chicago where gang violence is around every corner. The issue is, that the violence is starting to spill over into the "nicer/safer" neighborhoods and thats what has me really worried. And with that violence spilling over, you're having to worry about armed robbery, battery, etc. to go along with the chance of a round ricocheting into your home...edit on 20-8-2012 by jhn7537 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Sulie
Originally posted by jhn7537
Originally posted by followtheevidence
reply to post by jhn7537
Might have something to do with having the 3rd highest unemployment rate in the nation?
Are most of the shootings drug related? Gang related?
Idk ... stay safe in any case.
Unemployment surely has played a role in it (no statistics to go off of), but the majority of the violence happens on the South/West sides of Chicago where gang violence is around every corner. The issue is, that the violence is starting to spill over into the "nicer/safer" neighborhoods and thats what has me really worried. And with that violence spilling over, you're having to worry about armed robbery, battery, etc. to go along with the chance of a round ricocheting into your home...edit on 20-8-2012 by jhn7537 because: (no reason given)
Well, those areas don't have people to rob in them. I lived in Wrigleyville during the late 70's, early 80,s. It wasn't safe even then to walk outside of areas that were considered safe. Nicer areas surrounded by the ones that aren't are subject to crime. It isn't uncommon to find a wealthy block in Chicago to be ritzy, and the next block look like a war zone. If you don't like it, move. Even the suburbs aren't safe.
Originally posted by sonofonehunlo
Chicago is turning into "dark town" like Detroit.
Just leave.
Originally posted by jhn7537
Originally posted by sonofonehunlo
Chicago is turning into "dark town" like Detroit.
Just leave.
Easier said than done... I have a great job here in Chicago, which makes leaving tough... Not to mention my whole family lives here...
I just wish there was another solution like the City of Chicago figuring this mess out and turning this murder/crime wave around...
I dont expect them to fix this over night, but I want to see progess, and right now, I dont see any and the statistics dont lie..
Originally posted by davethebear
Wow..........5000 people have been killed in Chicago in just 11 years.......
How many of these have been due to firearms?
I know it's probably a dumb question coming from a none USA person and too late now in the short history of the USA, but why did they allow firearms in the first place?
Apparently everyone is allowed to individually bear arms in the US, but wouldn't the people who make all the rules have thought it a much better place if nobody was allowed to have firearms?
I suppose I will get a tirade of this, that and the other due to the fact that I don't live in the US, but it has never made much sense to me.....
Don't you think that you US citizens would have lived in a much safer environment all these years if the so called governing bodies would have had a much better view to how things would have panned out in the future?
Obviously you would have had the odd nut-case who wants to take a pot shot at somebody now and again as what we do over here in the UK. But If everybody is allowed to have guns, then what do they expect to happen, after all, the only reason anybody has a firearm is to defend themselves because everybody else has a firearm. If nobody had them then nobody would need them....
But like I stated earlier, it's rather a bit too late now isn't it?
Originally posted by jhn7537
Originally posted by davethebear
Wow..........5000 people have been killed in Chicago in just 11 years.......
How many of these have been due to firearms?
I know it's probably a dumb question coming from a none USA person and too late now in the short history of the USA, but why did they allow firearms in the first place?
Apparently everyone is allowed to individually bear arms in the US, but wouldn't the people who make all the rules have thought it a much better place if nobody was allowed to have firearms?
I suppose I will get a tirade of this, that and the other due to the fact that I don't live in the US, but it has never made much sense to me.....
Don't you think that you US citizens would have lived in a much safer environment all these years if the so called governing bodies would have had a much better view to how things would have panned out in the future?
Obviously you would have had the odd nut-case who wants to take a pot shot at somebody now and again as what we do over here in the UK. But If everybody is allowed to have guns, then what do they expect to happen, after all, the only reason anybody has a firearm is to defend themselves because everybody else has a firearm. If nobody had them then nobody would need them....
But like I stated earlier, it's rather a bit too late now isn't it?
All of them are due to firearms...
It’s not just this year that Chicago outpaced Afghanistan in terms of deaths by violence, either. Since 2001 more than 5,000 people have been killed by gunfire in Chicago, and during that same period 2,000 U.S. troops were killed in Afghanistan, Chicago’s WBEZ 91.5 reported.edit on 20-8-2012 by jhn7537 because: (no reason given)