It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by queenannie38
Originally posted by xuenchen
We know from reading the PPACA law that much power has been delegated to HHS.
So you've read all 900-something pages of the bill?
Or just some of it?
HHS is the one creating all these boards and panels.
Has anyone seen a complete list of HHS authorities ?
Especially Medicare related powers.
Many HHS authority may not be "reversible" by Congress ?
And I wonder what future administrations will do with present rules and regulations set up by HHS?
I don't think it is about rules and regulations but more about protecting people when they are denied coverage for treatment...creating another recourse other than suing the insurance company....as well as setting up some sort of watchdog over the excessive waste and over-pricing so prevalent in health care.
Obamacare has death panels!: That sounds so cartoonishly evil it must be true, right? Well, no. No part of the bill says anything about appointing people to decide whether or not someone dies. The decision over whether or not your claim is approved is still in the hands of your insurer. However, now there's an appeals process so if your claim gets turned down, you can challenge that. And the government watches that appeals process to make sure it's not being unfair to customers. So if anything the PPACA is trying to stop the death panels. ( Citation: Page 42, sec. 2719 )
What about the Independent Medical Advisory Board? Death Panels!: The Independent Medical Advisory Board is intended to give recommendations on how to save Medicare costs per person, deliver more efficient and effective care, improve access to services, and eliminate waste. However, they have no real power. They put together a recommendation to put before Congress, and Congress votes on it, and the President has power to veto it. What's more, they are specifically told that their recommendation will not ration health care, raise premiums or co-pays, restrict benefits, or restrict eligibility. In other words, they need to find ways to save money without reducing care for patients. So no death panels. In any sense of the (stupid) term. ( Citation: Page 426, sec. 3403 )
After “health,” the most frequently used word in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is neither “patient” nor “physician” nor “hospital” nor “insurance.” “Secretary,” as in “the secretary of health and human services,” is mentioned more than 2,500 times in the 2,300-page bill.
And more than 700 times, the PPACA says “the secretary shall.” [50] Each of these directives is a sign of new regulations to come on physicians and health care. Unfortunately, the PPACA was not the genesis of physician regulation, nor are these busy rulemakers limited to the federal government. “An extensive regulatory framework … arose haphazardly, with little consideration of how the pieces fit together,” the Federal Trade Commission and U.S. Department of Justice reported in 2004. [51] The huge numbers of state and federal regulations and their haphazard nature place tremendous burdens on physicians’ practices, most of which are still small businesses. These rules insert themselves between physicians and their patients, frequently do little to improve patient care, and divert physicians’ time and energy away from the patients in the exam room. We need to repeal, reorganize, and reprioritize if we want a functional health care delivery system...............
Repeal Harmful and Onerous Regulations
In a disturbing new discovery, American Action Forum research found that Affordable Care Act (ACA) regulations have missed nearly half of their deadlines. Of the ACA regulations with legal deadlines, 47 percent, 20 of 42, have broken the mandated implementation schedule.
“The Secretary shall…” language in legislation often allows legislators to cede broad policymaking authority to administrative agencies. In significant regulatory overhauls, such as Dodd-Frank or the ACA, the phrase literally appears hundreds of times. However, with both pieces of legislation, agencies are often required to issue regulations by a specific date. ...................
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Sulie
i'll tell you what.............there was such an outrage in Arizona over illegals with children receiving benefits, while tax paying citizens were denied.........lawsuit after lawsuit........
It's gong to get dirty and nasty, because while illegals in Arizona were receiving benefits, single people in Arizona who had paid taxes were denied unless they had a catastrophic illness........like cancer.
It has been eye opening for people who pay taxes in this state, and outrageous!
Yeah.
Well people in Arizona are crazy.
Two notable regulations that missed their deadlines are also two of the more controversial. The new requirements for the calorie labeling of food in vending machines and menu items will cost restaurants and other small businesses more than $822 million to implement, and generate more than 1.4 million annual paperwork burden hours. However, businesses are still waiting for a final rule, and the proposed version arrived late as well.
Originally posted by neoholographic
Obamacare is a system that's designed to kill people off as they get older.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
Originally posted by Annee
Originally posted by Sulie
i'll tell you what.............there was such an outrage in Arizona over illegals with children receiving benefits, while tax paying citizens were denied.........lawsuit after lawsuit........
It's gong to get dirty and nasty, because while illegals in Arizona were receiving benefits, single people in Arizona who had paid taxes were denied unless they had a catastrophic illness........like cancer.
It has been eye opening for people who pay taxes in this state, and outrageous!
Yeah.
Well people in Arizona are crazy.
Annie!!! way to make a mighty blanket statement.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by Annee
I lived in Arizona, we came to the conclusion that too much heat does things to the brain.
It is still the wild west, only with air conditioning.
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by Honor93
Because when you have a healthcare system that is based on for profit, doctors don't want to take health insurance, such as medicare, that pays them less.
Which is why there are so few geriatric specialists.
Also the reason for so few PCP, because everyone becomes a specialist to make the dough.
Ease the student loan burden for PCP or internal medicine doctors, or pay them more, and you will see the shortage go away.
They are too busy and don't make enough.
so, are you arguing for the sake of arguing or what exactly ?
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by Honor93
Because when you have a healthcare system that is based on for profit, doctors don't want to take health insurance, such as medicare, that pays them less.
Which is why there are so few geriatric specialists.
Also the reason for so few PCP, because everyone becomes a specialist to make the dough.
Ease the student loan burden for PCP or internal medicine doctors, or pay them more, and you will see the shortage go away.
They are too busy and don't make enough.
it hasn't been that big of a deal until now ... more seniors/medicare/medicaid and less providers. what does the "for profit" thing have to do with it ??
a healthcare system that is based on for profit, doctors don't want to take health insurance, such as medicare, that pays them less
really ?? guess that depends on location, location, location, eh ??
Which is why there are so few geriatric specialists
This is the reason he cut 716 billion from Medicare.