It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ThePeopleParty
Why did NASA leave the reflector behind to bounce lazers off from earth?
2nd.
I have seen it explained as washout on at least one sight, but it was set up by NASA.
Sorry, but I prefer independent analysis, not by the people making the claim for or against, just like I don't believe cops investigating cops aren't biased.
Some of the photos are obviously washed out, or overexposed, and lumping those in with others that aren't so cut and dried is a little disingenuous.
Like I said, I think they went.
But they aren't telling us everything, and what that is, I have no idea and no intention of speculating, out loud anyway..
The after landing interview is a little suspect as well.
Those guys look like they just lost their best friend.
Would you be sullen if you were the first man to step on the moon?
I don't buy the argument that after the moon, everything was a let down...
Bullcrap, you would be losing your mind with the excitement of it, not looking like you just got off of a red eye flight full of screaming babies.
Nonsense.
Originally posted by ViktorHaze
The after landing interview is a little suspect as well.
Those guys look like they just lost their best friend.
Would you be sullen if you were the first man to step on the moon?
I don't buy the argument that after the moon, everything was a let down...
[color=FF8138]Bullcrap, you would be losing your mind with the excitement of it, not looking like you just got off of a red eye flight full of screaming babies.
Originally posted by ViktorHaze
Why is it that if you believe that there is something fishy with the moon landing you are automatically a "moon hoax crackpot"?
There are plenty of unexplained anomalies that still have not been debunked.
The crosshairs in camera for instance...that one alone is worth looking at.
Originally posted by wmd_2008
Originally posted by ViktorHaze
Why is it that if you believe that there is something fishy with the moon landing you are automatically a "moon hoax crackpot"?
There are plenty of unexplained anomalies that still have not been debunked.
The crosshairs in camera for instance...that one alone is worth looking at.
That old chestnut have you been asleep for years!!!
Press control and + to zoom in when viewing the picture to see the black line is there.
Here is another use ctrl and + again to zoom.
How it works because the object is very bright it makes the thin black line look like it's no longer there the white seems to bleed over the black line.
You can duplicate that here on earth and people have.
ALL repeat ALL the photographic problems have been debunked many times it's always people with no real undestanding of photography that ask them.
Hers is a link to a pdf document dealing with them.
austhink.com...edit on 12-8-2012 by wmd_2008 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ViktorHaze
As I said earlier, washout explains some of them but not all, and that's one of them.
Kubrick directed the moon landing footage . . .
He was THE BEST at what he did at the time.
Originally posted by pirhanna
Its not that the moon landing was a hoax. That hoax is itself a hoax.
the point is to keep everyone distracted from what they really found there that
they are keeping secreted away from us.
......and if you jumped off a bridge, everyone else would follow you.
Originally posted by ViktorHaze
I have been to far less interesting places than the fakking MOON, and was eager to tell anybody who would listen about it.
I have heard/read ALOT of ignorant comments over the years, but you have just quickly jumped up to the top of that list. Honestly, I didn't think the previous #1 could ever be outdone, but you have somehow managed to overtake it.
Originally posted by ViktorHaze
If you and your fellow worshipers spent less time stroking your wee apollo, and more time actually paying attention, you might get past your blindness/ego/what-ever-the-F-your-problem-is.
Originally posted by ViktorHaze
reply to post by wmd_2008
Well, chucklenuts, that first photo does not show the line on top of the white, no matter how much you zoom in.
As I said earlier, washout explains some of them but not all, and that's one of them.
Being a smug wanna be know it all, only works if you actually are.
Trying to deride my questions about some of the things I find questionable, will not work on me, mostly because, I do not consider someone acting like an asshole on an internet forum to be an "expert".
To repeat:
I THINK THEY WENT.
I THINK THEY ARE NOT SHOWING US AN ACCURATE RECORD.
I DO NOT KNOW WHY, NOR DO I CARE TO SPECULATE.
I DO WANT TO KNOW WHY.
Clear enough for you, wise guy?