It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by acmpnsfal
www.wbur.org/2010/11/13/texas-stadium Read that article I cant link off my cell. The article in the OP is missing some information, when the voters decided to approve spending money on the school they did not just focus on football. The total amount the school receieved was 120 million. 60 went to the stadium, the other 60 went towards building a new fine arts facility and a career tech center. They improved things for a lot of students not just the football players.
Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com
Originally posted by Juggernog
Originally posted by azbowhunter
High School Football in Texas is more important than Jesus, and they LOVE Jesus.
Not all of us. I havent been to a HS Football game since I was in Middle School and I only went there to socialize lol.
Originally posted by charles1952
Yes, I know the money could go into other projects, but what seems to be the major alternative here is education.
A number of people seem to be claiming that putting more money into education will produce better educational results. This baffles me. I have never seen evidence that this is the case. Consider the billions that the feds put into education. Our scores haven't gone up. Countries spending less on education do better in international rankings.
Please show me that more money will improve education and I might consider the argument.
Originally posted by charles1952
Yes, I know the money could go into other projects, but what seems to be the major alternative here is education.
A number of people seem to be claiming that putting more money into education will produce better educational results. This baffles me. I have never seen evidence that this is the case. Consider the billions that the feds put into education. Our scores haven't gone up. Countries spending less on education do better in international rankings.
Please show me that more money will improve education and I might consider the argument.
Your absolutely right, there is a difference. Some poorly funded schools are at the top of whatever measure of success you use, and some are at the bottom. And yes, relatively current text books are very nearly an absolute necessity.
Do you honestly believe that there isnt a difference between a poorly funded school and a well-funded school??
My problem here is the "because of that" idea. My post was asking for some evidence that that was the case. There are other possible causes. Were the parents in Naperville convinced that an education was necessary? Was the neighborhood and home conducive to study and learning? There are many more possibilities.
I grew up in Naperville, IL which is a very rich suburb of Chicago. The schools I went to were well funded and because of that the graduation rates were tops in the country, test score averages ranked with the best in the country, and the majority of the graduating students went on to a 4-year university...
Consider my comments about Naperville. I don't live in inner city Chicago, so I only hear rumors, but I would wonder if going to school that day was safe or if I was walking into a turf war. I would be concerned about food, drugs, and finding physical protection in some form or another before worries about school. A school where the other students might taunt me or worse, if I studied hard.
Now look at the inner city schools here in Chicago, where they're poorly funded and you will see a total drop off, graduation rates at record lows, testing scores are so low they cant qualify for the necessary funding, etc...
It doesn't necessarily bring in better educators, it brings in more expensive educators. How do we know who the better educators are? The unions resist any attempt to grade their members based on the kid's performance. Better resources and atmosphere? I'm sorry, first those are awfully vague concepts, and secondly, can someone show me that the students do significantly better because of them?
The money improves education because it can bring in better educators, it can give teachers better resources to teach their students, and it can create a better learning atmosphere for everyone around...
Originally posted by riddle6
$60 million is a hell of a lot to spend on a stadium, but its not like it will only be used for football. Stadiums like this can also be used for soccer games and marching band competitions. They can even play host to professional level sporting events (like some of the stadiums near my house). If they're brave enough to face the heat, they can also host graduation ceremonies The rooms inside the stadium can be used for all sorts of things like banquets, meetings, and even testing events like the SATs or ACTs. When used correctly, the return on this one stadium could be immense.
Texas is forecast to have the third-highest gross domestic product growth of all the states this year, behind North Dakota and Oklahoma, and was expected to regain the jobs it lost from its pre-recession peak in the first quarter this year. Only Alaska and North Dakota could make similar job-growth claims, the economic intelligence firm said.
nothing to do for outdoor activity except go to the lake.
(Page 91 t.45)
1. Construction of Elementary Schools #16 and #17. . . . . . . . . $42.4 million
4. Renovations/Upgrades to Existing School Facilities. . . . . . . . $76.6 million
5. Campus Security Upgrades . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $1.3 million
7. HVAC Renovations / Roof Replacements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $15.9 million
(same source as above)
1. Performing Arts Center $23.3 million
2. District Transportation / Student Nutrition Service Center $36.5 million
3. Multipurpose Stadium $59.6 million
The state funding formula provides for two types of debt service support – the Instructional Facility Allotment (IFA) and the Existing Debt Allotment (EDA). These allotments are both weighted to take into consideration the property wealth per student of the receiving districts.
The Legislature’s practice of rolling forward new debt into EDA ensures that Allen’s debt is equalized to the highest levels. However,the District’s property wealth per student exceeds the maximum allowed for the EDA Program. As such, the District will not receive any EDA funding in 2011/12.
(and how much that ratio actually is)
The total outstanding debt (principal only) is $24,144 per student. The total amount of debt per student based on 2011/12 principal and interest is approximately $1,903.