Help ATS with a contribution via PayPal:
learn more

Romney now running for Bush's 3rd Term - Full Bush Neocon Team In Place

page: 3
41
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join

posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 12:18 PM
link   
Romney now running for Bush's 3rd Term - Full Bush Neocon Team In Place,

Seem's some people have not been paying attention to the nobel peace prize winning neocon who is Bush's third term from the mass murder in libya,Somalia,Yemen.,Pakistan,to assasination's of American citizens overseas.Then we have the act of war agianst Iran via operation oiympic games virus,and aid to the Syrian rebels/Al queda.

Last time i checked between Obama and Romney they only person who hasn't murdered anyone is Romney.




posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 12:19 PM
link   
reply to post by RealSpoke
 





Romney is a creepy crony capitalist Zionist Mormon..need I say more?


Nope that bigotry speaks for itself



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 01:08 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


Obama is not responsible for Libya, Somalia, or Yemen. Despite what you and other neocon fanboy's propaganda campaign would say. Out of one corner of your mouth you claim Obama is weak and not going after terrorists. Then out of the other corner you deride him for prosecuting a war on terror (which isn't even his war). Supporting the UN campaign in Libya is not the same of using lies and deception to start a war in Iraq. Whether you admit it or not, Obama ended those wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, as far as our having an active combat role there. Unfortunately, the US will be stuck with some form of military presence there for decades to come, and that was the scheme of the Neocons Mitt Romney has now surrounded himself with.

As much distance as Romney and the GOP might want to put between themselves and the Bush regime, this team he has selected shows Romney will be exactly like Bush, as far as war and foreign policy goes.



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 01:12 PM
link   
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


Really must be nice being a liberal/democrat never being responsible for anything they do, and YES THE NEOCON Obama is responsible for his murderous actions, because the left says the war of "terror does not exist.

The biggest neocons in this country is the left even tho they create threads like this one and try to pass the right off for the things they do.



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 01:21 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


So, according to you, the biggest neocons are the left?

And Obama is the worst neocon of all?

Congratulations, you just entered the double-speak hall of fame.

Before you go off on Obama being "the most murderous president", maybe you'd like to explain to a few hundred thousand dead Iraqi civilians which president deserves the to be called the "most murderous".



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 01:23 PM
link   
reply to post by Blackmarketeer
 


Right so what the hell is the difference between Bush and OBama?

Absolutely not a damn thing only blind ideologues can't,don't, or do not want to see that rather sad when poltical ideology is clouding common sense.

Bush's third term is Obamas current term in the famous words of Clnton WE came We saw Gaddafi died and thousands have died in the past 3 and half years.

Yemen,Somalia,Pakistan,Syria,Libya= Obama
Iraq,Afghanistan-Bush
edit on 2-8-2012 by neo96 because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:21 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 



The biggest neocons in this country is the left even tho they create threads like this one and try to pass the right off for the things they do.

HUH?

So neocons are bad then, but they are from the left?
Nice smear job.
edit on 2-8-2012 by speculativeoptimist because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:22 PM
link   
Not very suprising to say the least, although I would of thought some of those people would of been dead by now. LOL. Im wondering if Cheney was on a waiting list for that new heart, like the rest of the populus. Probably from a teenegar, so he'll be around for a while. SUCKS



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:23 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 


Uhhhh, how in the world is that bigotry? I don't agree with zionism, crony capitalists or Mormons. They have horrible world views that would affect the way they run the country.

Why don't you call everyone that calls Obama a socialist a bigot? Ohhhh because you like that.

It's alright though, you were born in 1996, your brain still has time to develop.

edit on 2-8-2012 by RealSpoke because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:37 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 



Right so what the hell is the difference between Bush and OBama?

Absolutely not a damn thing only blind ideologues can't,don't, or do not want to see that rather sad when poltical ideology is clouding common sense


LOL, you just made all of your posts obsolete.

Flip Flop more Mitt jr.



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:40 PM
link   
reply to post by speculativeoptimist
 


Since when is truth "a smear job" ?


Neoconservatism is a variant of the political ideology of conservatism which combines features of traditional conservatism with political individualism and a qualified endorsement of free markets.[1] Neoconservatism (or new conservatives) is rooted in a group of former liberals, who in the late 1960s, began to oppose many of the policies and principles associated with President Lyndon Johnson's Great Society programs.[2] The term "neoconservative" was initially used in the 1930s to describe American liberals who criticized other liberals who followed a path closer to Soviet communism.[3] Contents



en.wikipedia.org...



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:41 PM
link   
reply to post by RealSpoke
 


Meh, one thing i've learned is that some people will say anything to deny reality. To those saying Romney won't win-Don't be so sure. They said the same thing about Bush II. I think by hook or crook Romney will get in there. ATS will hate him the next week and liberals can actually post a thread without 90% of ATS trolling it.



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:44 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 

From your source:


[edit]Politicians
George W. Bush --President of the United States 2001-9; numerous neocon advisors[93][94]
Dick Cheney --Vice President 2001-9; numerous neocon advisors[95][96][97][98]
Lindsey Graham Senator from South Carolina
Henry M. Jackson --Democratic Senator from Washington State
Joe Lieberman --Independent Senator from Connecticut
Richard Lugar Republican Senator from Indiana
John McCain Republican Senator from Arizona; numerous neocon advisors
Daniel Patrick Moynihan --Democratic Senator from New York
Colin Powell Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice Secretary of State
Donald Rumsfeld --Secretary of Defense; numerous neocon advisors[95][96][98]
[edit]Government officials
Paul Wolfowitz -- State and Defense Department official
R. James Woolsey, Jr. --Director of Central Intelligence, Under Secretary of the Navy, green energy lobbyist.
Richard Perle --Assistant Secretary of Defense, lobbyist.
Jeane Kirkpatrick --Ambassador to the United Nations
Scooter Libby --Chief-of-Staff to Cheney
Condoleezza Rice --Secretary of State
Richard Armitage --Defense Department official
Zalmay Khalilzad --State and Defense Department official
Elliot Abrams --Republican foreign policy adviser.
William G. Boykin --Under Secretary of Defense for Intelligence
Frank Gaffney --Defense Department official, founder of the Center for Security Policy
John R. Bolton --Ambassador to the United Nations
Eliot A. Cohen --US State Department Counselor 2007-2009, now Robert E. Osgood Professor of Strategic Studies at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies at the Johns Hopkins University.

Yea, looks like a bunch of the left to me. < scratches head >



Since when is truth "a smear job" ?

When it is misrepresented and thinly spread to fill the holes in one's logic?
edit on 2-8-2012 by speculativeoptimist because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:50 PM
link   
reply to post by speculativeoptimist
 


Lot more to that arctile than just that like this:


Some writers and intellectuals have argued that criticism of neoconservatism is often a euphemism for criticism of Jews, and that the term has been adopted by the political left to stigmatize support for Israel.


Like this comment in the thread seems to prove that




Romney is a creepy crony capitalist Zionist Mormon..need I say more?



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:51 PM
link   

Originally posted by RealSpoke
reply to post by neo96
 



Right so what the hell is the difference between Bush and OBama?

Absolutely not a damn thing only blind ideologues can't,don't, or do not want to see that rather sad when poltical ideology is clouding common sense


LOL, you just made all of your posts obsolete.

Flip Flop more Mitt jr.


We can talk about flip flopping like:

Gitmo is still open, and there is more war

now than under the last guy, there has been more spending under this guy than the last guy.

Obama lied and people are dying.



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:52 PM
link   
Wow an impressive group of patriots with track records to prove it, who take America first, not none of this "I'm a citizen of the World" bullcrap. Will definitely get more votes than turn votes away, but I doubt it will be that much of a factor.

The group in the White House now are a carbon copy of Carter's policies. Brzezinski was and is a huge supporter. Instrumental in arming the Mujahdeen in Afghanistan, was around when Iran turned anti western Islamic Republic, backed bombing in Kosovo, supported action in Libya.

The differences are like night and day, so this type of polar opposite think tank support for each side is expected.



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:53 PM
link   
reply to post by neo96
 

That's not really related to my statements, I just took a little offense to today's left being called the 'biggest neocons.' Seems a little unfair, inaccurate and felt like an attack. But so goes the lovely game of politics I suppose. Carry on....
I want you to know to that I have edited my comments and withdrew the personal knee jerk angst, because I do not want to be that way, I think it helps to have that attitude. So while I disagree with you man, I will still respect, but sometimes we can get defensive to such bold claims that so often arise in an emotional fashion.

I often hear people say that the left did all this and that attacking Bush, which tells me the they do not like the over the top end of attacking.. So why turn around and do the same thing to others? It just fuels the destructive cycle. Perhaps we should refrain from doing that which we disapprove of, especially knowing the damage it does.
edit on 2-8-2012 by speculativeoptimist because: (no reason given)



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:54 PM
link   
Wait according to NWO theorists, none of this should matter because the same shadow government controls democrats and republicans, right?



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:55 PM
link   

Originally posted by beezzer
Stupid is voting for someone or against someone based on skin colour.


So... Romney being white has nothing to do with how people perceive, and vote, for him?




Stupid is voting for bigger government and loss of freedoms.

I'm so glad that we agree that the patriot act, enacted under Bush Jr, was stupid.




Stupid is ignoring the high unemployment, record food stamp applications, and a poor economy.

And ignoring, as well as championing, the actions that got us into this mess isn't stupid? You're right, it isn't stupid - it's flat out retarded.




Stupid is polarising the US population with class warfare.

So the Neo-Con, and republican agenda.




Stupid is dividing the country along racial lines.

Because President Darkie, is a Muslim and wasn't born in the US.... right?



Stupid is pandering to special interest groups and ignoring the population.

Please tell me that you're trolling with this one, when Neo-Cons are notorious for massaging their own special interest and ignoring everyone else. If you don't consider no-contract bids to private companies, for Iraq/Afhganistan, not pandering to special interest groups, then you have a few screws loose.

So Romney has people on his team that worked for previous republican administrations.

I'd call that smart.
edit on 1-8-2012 by beezzer because: (no reason given)


That's like saying it's a good idea to hire the crew from the Titanic because they're "experienced".



posted on Aug, 2 2012 @ 02:59 PM
link   
reply to post by speculativeoptimist
 


Under Wilson,Rooselvet,Johnson,Clinton, Obama 5 Democratic neocons to Trumans dropping of nuclear weapons when it comes to war have the most blood shed on their hands.
edit on 2-8-2012 by neo96 because: (no reason given)





new topics

top topics



 
41
<< 1  2    4  5  6 >>

log in

join