So an athlete is given the bronze medal at the Olympics then comes home and has to shell out $3,500 to the taxman?
Abhorrent!
For instance: Americans who win bronze will pay a $2 tax on the medal itself. But the bronze comes with a modest prize—$10,000 as an honorarium for devoting your entire life to being the third best athlete on the planet in your chosen discipline. And the IRS will take $3,500 of that, thank you very much.
Originally posted by OLD HIPPY DUDE
Personally I am not a big fan of the Olympics, but taxing olympic medal winners seems so wrong.
Can someone explain this tax ?
Is winning a medal considered earned income ?
I understand there is an honorarium with the medal, but this is punishing those for succeeding, right ?
For instance: Americans who win bronze will pay a $2 tax on the medal itself. But the bronze comes with a modest prize—$10,000 as an honorarium for devoting your entire life to being the third best athlete on the planet in your chosen discipline. And the IRS will take $3,500 of that, thank you very much.
www.weeklystandard.com...
This is their profession...the medals and prize money is their income...I don't see the problem. These athletes don't just sit around and do nothing for 4 years..they compete and win money as income for their performance. I'm failing to see why they should be exempt from taxes.
Aren't you one who is against a higher business tax ? Punishing the wealthy for suceeding ?
Originally posted by Murad
reply to post by OLD HIPPY DUDE
I imagine the medals, especialy gold would be considered by the IRS to be of some intrinsic value.and may constitute an earning. If my employer agreed to pay me in gold instead of money I cant not exactly pay tax on it. All they need to do is stay out the country for a while untill there tax exempt.