It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by speculativeoptimist
reply to post by GoldenRuled
As an Oregon resident, I heard about this some time ago and thought it was just crazy. I could think of no other reason than they want us dependent on their goods, not our own or nature's. But the reasoning is because if everyone did this, it would disrupt the natural ebb and flow of water supply to the land itself, including streams and wetlands. Seems like a stretch, but I can see a little sense in that. I am still suspicious though, because to me there is middle ground, in that collecting rainwater on a small personal level should be okay, but if an industry started up, or larger setups were designed, maybe that would affect the natural ecosystems.
Peace,
spec
I thought the economy was doing steadily well in Oregon.
Originally posted by Common Good
Why are they resorting to this unless the man on the property is disrupting waterflow in a major way?
But Tom Paul, administrator of the Oregon Water Resources Department, claims that Harrington has been violating the state’s water use law by diverting water from streams running into the Big Butte River.
Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to post by SoymilkAlaska
Not quite that simple. Appears there are two Oregon laws at point here, and he's actually got a series of dams on the property stopping rain & snowmelt runoff from getting back into the water supply (which as far as I can tell from quick review, could affect more runoff just than what generates on his land).
I'm a little mixed on this one, need to look further into it. Will be interesting to keep an eye on.
.According to Oregon water laws, all water is publicly owned. Therefore, anyone who wants to store any type of water on their property must first obtain a permit from state water managers.
Harrington said he applied for three permits to legally house reservoirs for storm and snow water runoff on his property. One of the “reservoirs” had been on his property for 37 years, he said..
Originally posted by GoldenRuled
reply to post by Praetorius
These dams also have practical applications, and more often the reasons are for preventing land erosion. I have family using similar methods.
Source: cnsnews.com...
“They issued me my permits. I had my permits in hand and they retracted them just arbitrarily, basically. They took them back and said ‘No, you can’t have them,’ so I’ve been fighting it ever since,” Harrington told CNSNews.com.
Source: cnsnews.com...
The case, he said, is centered on a 1925 law which states that the city of Medford holds exclusive rights to “all core sources of water” in the Big Butte Creek watershed and its tributaries.
Originally posted by GoldenRuled
reply to post by Praetorius
These dams also have practical applications, and more often the reasons are for preventing land erosion. I have family using similar methods.edit on 27-7-2012 by GoldenRuled because: (no reason given)