It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Aljazeera.net
Falluja groom among dead in US strike
The US military said the attack early on Friday was targeted at a meeting of the al-Qaida-linked network of Jordanian-born fugitive Abu Musab al-Zarqawi.
The attack came despite signs of progress in negotiations to bring Iraqi government forces back into Falluja for the first time in months.
Dr Ahmad Sayeed said his hospital received 13 dead, including the groom, and 17 wounded, including the bride. He said most of the injured were female relatives of the groom who were staying at the house after the wedding celebration.
Muhammad Jawad, who lives next door, said he had just moved into the central neighborhood to escape repeated shelling on Falluja's outskirts. His brother and six nephews were killed in the strike, which damaged their house.
Shrapnel wounds
"This attack shows that there is no safe place in Falluja, and the Americans are not differentiating between civilians and armed men," Jawad sobbed as he was treated for shrapnel wounds to his face and hand.
The US command, however, said "credible intelligence sources" reported that leaders of al-Zarqawi's group - Tawhid and Jihad - were meeting in the targeted house.
The attack was among a dozen "precision strikes" launched since September against al-Zarqawi's network, which has claimed responsibility for seizing and killing several foreign captives.
According to the US statement, those strikes have dealt a "significant blow" to al-Zarqawi's movement, killing several key figures including his chief lieutenant Muhammed al-Lubnani and spiritual adviser Abu Anas al-Shami.
For weeks, the Iraqi government has been in contact with community representatives in Falluja, seeking to strike a deal to reassert control of the city.
Defence Minister Hazem Shaalan said the two sides were nearing agreement on a plan providing for a three-day halt to attacks, followed by the return of Iraqi troops into the city.
Condemnation
Condemning the US strikes, Muslim clerics in Iraq said it was part of Washington�s "scorched earth" policy.
"Falluja is being hit every day under the guise of striking al-Zarqawi, and residents take out a two-year-old child from under the rubble. Is this al-Zarqawi?" asked Shaikh Abd al-Ghafur al-Samarrai in a fiery sermon at Baghdad's Umm al-Qura mosque on Friday.
"The Americans are using [Israeli Prime Minister Ariel] Sharon's scorched earth and collective punishment policy."
Referring to the ongoing negotiations in Falluja, Shaikh Ahmad Hassan al-Samarrai at a sermon in Baghdad's Abu Hanifa mosque said: "Some members of the delegation say the talks are going well ... and then we have an operation that kills and wounds people."
Originally posted by fusion360
One side will never ever admit they are wrong, so it will keep going on and on forever. If it really was an insurgent meeting, couldn't special ops go and spy on this "meeting" beforehand? is it already done before and the insurgents always lie?
Originally posted by fanoose
Originally posted by fusion360
One side will never ever admit they are wrong, so it will keep going on and on forever. If it really was an insurgent meeting, couldn't special ops go and spy on this "meeting" beforehand? is it already done before and the insurgents always lie?
You know you got strong argument there. . .
Lets say they are 100% insurgents, which's better to capture them and use them to lead you to other groups or kill them and destroy other houses and the survivors will join the insurgents for revenge?
I heard that the occupation uses 'contractors' to get within civilians to try and 'leak' infos to them, Now some of those contractors used it to blackmail civilians, for example "give me money Or i'm gonna 'leak' that you're one of the insurgents!!
Originally posted by Murcielago
We have air superiority, so its much less risky and easier to just drop a bomb on the location and not get any soldiers killed.
Originally posted by Murcielago
Which one would you rather see on the news?
fanoose
I would rather see terrorists/soldiers die than children or innocent people.
Originally posted by Murcielago
I agree with you on children, but if you see them pulling a dead guy out of the rubble that was once a house and them saying why did this innocent man have to die, there assuming that he was innocent, the only difference between a innocent man and a terrorist is his brain and how he perceives the world.