It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Ilyich
reply to post by Doc Gator
I agree with all your statements but the last.
I don't think Russia is a guaranteed loss to NATO, I would think there motivation not to be drawn in a fire fight with NATO would be again they will look like the bad guy.
I don't doubt the Russians can hold their own against the NATO Nations in the Area, the problem would be facing ALLLLLLL of NATO. Some 64 nations I think. If Russia gets drawn into a fire fight with NATO, for what ever the reason Russia will inevitably be made to look like the bad guy, and that is the only thing I think they would be worried about.
Originally posted by MischeviousElf
Um now as this is an actual action, intentions lead people to try and work out what the actions will be.
This is an action so it shows us exactly what the "intention" is, and it shows that Russia does not want to escalate this to an Cuba style or Vietnam style issue.
Originally posted by MischeviousElf
They backed down, have not supported an ally when he needs them the most, have taken an step back from going face to face with Nato etc....
Originally posted by MischeviousElf
This is in fact the most clear "intention" and "finger on the pulse" the west has had besides the posturing of putin from years probably since the u2 plane was shot down, so I am sorry I dont only disagree with you I think you are trolling, or have no idea of the what you said meant.
Originally posted by MischeviousElf
The reason Britain had something to with it is the reason it was sent back in the first place, it was intercepted by the British navy in British waters and turned away, it would have to pass our waters to get to syria from its port..
Originally posted by MischeviousElf
It would not have got to the med especially with an armed escort and an sub with it, it would have been blockaded by britain..
Originally posted by MischeviousElf
stop trolling me maloy I thought you were on here longer than that and better than that to.
Originally posted by maloy
reply to post by leosnake
Russians can refer to ethnical Russians (who make up about 70% of Russia), or people with Russian nationality (who make up over 90% of Russia).
Originally posted by leosnake
Originally posted by maloy
reply to post by leosnake
Russians can refer to ethnical Russians (who make up about 70% of Russia), or people with Russian nationality (who make up over 90% of Russia).
there is ethnic Russian and Russian citizens who have Russian citizenship but another nationality.
Ethnic Russian if he lives in Germany calls himself Russian
and not a German.
Germans who live in the territory of RF refer to themselves as Germans and not the Russian and their documents indicate nationality - German
Originally posted by leosnake
160 ethnic groups speak some 100 language
Originally posted by leosnake
The Russian Federation comprises 83 federal subjects.[116] These subjects have equal representation—two delegates each—in the Federation Council.[117] However, they differ in the degree of autonomy they enjoy.
Originally posted by maloy
reply to post by leosnake
What do you mean by "only 20% supported Government of Putin"? All three times he was elected by the majority vote, in relatively clean elections. I say relatively clean because they were never completely clean in Russia to begin with. But there is little debate or arguement about his support - the majority of the population is content and chose him for better or worse. And all citizens of Russia can vote in elections, so I don't understand why you bring the question of ethnicity and nationality into the picture. The vast majority of the population if the Russian Federation are Russians and consider themselves as Russians.
Originally posted by maloy
reply to post by leosnake
He got over 60%, or 46 million votes. As for the large portion of the population not voting - that is common in many Werstern countries, including US. [/quote03
0,6 x 60 = 36% , 64 % does not support him even by official figuresedit on 21-7-2012 by leosnake because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by leosnake
Originally posted by maloy
reply to post by leosnake
What do you mean by "only 20% supported Government of Putin"? All three times he was elected by the majority vote, in relatively clean elections. I say relatively clean because they were never completely clean in Russia to begin with. But there is little debate or arguement about his support - the majority of the population is content and chose him for better or worse. And all citizens of Russia can vote in elections, so I don't understand why you bring the question of ethnicity and nationality into the picture. The vast majority of the population if the Russian Federation are Russians and consider themselves as Russians.
from the 100 million eligible voters voted only 60mln,
of these 60mln 50% according to official figures that is, 30 million voted for Putin
that is 30% of the total number of voters, considering the large percentage of fraud especially in the Caucasus. Chukotka and other regions where the official votes for more than 90% of voters, which is physically impossible,
for Putin voted no more than 25 million people from 100 million eligible voters that is 25%