President Bush, and Vice President Cheney conceded today that Iraq did not have WMD's. Reports have been coming out over the last couple of weeks and
months that Iraq did not have Weapons of Mass Destruction. Instead the Bush Administration is pushing on the Oil for Food Program as an Iraq war
rationale.
story.news.yahoo.com
President Bush and his vice president conceded Thursday in the clearest terms yet that Saddam Hussein had no weapons of mass destruction, even as
they tried to shift the Iraq war debate to a new issue — whether the invasion was justified because Saddam was abusing a U.N. oil-for-food program.
"The Duelfer report showed that Saddam was systematically gaming the system, using the U.N. oil-for-food program to try to influence countries and
companies in an effort to undermine sanctions," Bush said as he prepared to fly to campaign events in Wisconsin. "He was doing so with the intent of
restarting his weapons program once the world looked away."
Duelfer found no formal plan by Saddam to resume WMD production, but the inspector surmised that Saddam intended to do so if U.N. sanctions were
lifted. Bush seized upon that inference, using the word "intent" three times in reference to Saddam's plans to resume making weapons.
This week marks the first time that the Bush administration has listed abuses in the oil-for-fuel program as an Iraq war rationale. But the strategy
holds risks because some of the countries that could be implicated include U.S. allies, such as Poland, Jordan and Egypt. In addition, the United
States itself played a significant role in both the creation of the program and how it was operated and overseen.
Please visit the link provided for the complete story.
I do not know what is worse, finally admitting there was no WMD's, or using the Oil for Food as an excuse. Considering the US was the major
contributor to the creation and uphold of the program, this could fare much worse.
[edit on 7-10-2004 by TrickmastertricK]