Originally posted by exponent
So let me get this right. It doesn't matter whether it's inaccurate or not? You don't even bother to check the accuracy of things you post, just
post them anyway?
The NIST report is a bunch of theories, but you will quote from it right?
If in your opinion the video is inaccurate then that is up to you, I happen to think that it is a good analysis of the collapse of the towers, and the
beams, I'm entitled to that, I posted it because it is interesting and plausible, and others in this thread agree with me. If you don't agree with
the video, or find it interesting I really could not care. As I have said, I do not post just for you.
No, posting a video and then refusing to answer vital questions about it is playing a game. You are claiming this video is accurate, but refuse
to defend its inaccuracies.
If that is your opinion then you are free to think that, other people in this thread have praised the video, I cannot please everyone. As Already
stated to you quite a few times, I posted it because it was interesting and plausible, my actual OP comments were the following:
"His presentation explains where explosives would have been placed to bring the towers down, and analyses the beams in the debris, and other
important factors surrounding the collapse of these buildings."
Where in that statement am I saying it is entirely accurate? You are making that up claim up! I'm not saying it is accurate, and I'm not saying it
is in accurate, I'm saying it is interesting and very plausible.
I do not have to answer technical questions about every video I post, I posted it for everyone to see, so they can take it as they wish. I do not
claim to be a structual engineer, or and explosives technician, I do however think Gordon Ross's presentation is very good, he puts his presentation
across well, and his ideas are very plausible.
If they are not to your liking, or if you have any specific questions, then you are free to contact Gordon Ross directly, I'm sure he will be happy
to answer any questions you may have about his video presentation.
I have ignored the rest of your questions comments because they are just meaningless immature drivel that are of no interest to me.
Enjoy the video, and do speak to Gordon Ross if you have any further questions.