It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
House Democratic leaders this week are intensifying accusations that Republicans want to sink the economy simply to defeat President Obama in November.
The Democrats say House GOP leaders are sitting on a host of proposals – some of them with broad bipartisan support – that could create jobs immediately. Republicans are refusing to bring those bills to the floor, the Democrats charge, because an improved economy could play to Obama's advantage in the polls.
"We have enormous tasks in front of us and an obstructionist Congress that refuses to deal with these realities. This is creating a perfect storm for November," Rep. John Larson (Conn.), chairman of the House Democratic Caucus, told reporters in the Capitol Tuesday.
Maybe 30 small bills would actually be the answer ?? All the "one big" bills have been failing.
"The Republicans will say they sent 30 bills over to the Senate. They sent 30 pieces of message over to the Senate," House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said earlier in the month. "We don’t need 30 message bills, we need one good bill, one good bipartisan bill and that’s the transportation bill."
Originally posted by LDragonFire
The country witnessed the obstructionists congress fight over the budget battles, and the country has a 15% approval rating for congress and I do think its fair to say that this congress would rather allow America to fail before they would reach across the aisle to make agreements that would be good for the entire nation.
They can not see past there ideology, and it seems they have taken a all or nothing approach. We will see if they win or lose the up coming election.
edit on 20-6-2012 by LDragonFire because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by xuenchen
I wonder why the Democrats don't reach across the aisle ?
When republicans call for bipartisanship it means "you give a little, I'll give a little, and we'll work together to achieve a mutually beneficial piece of legislation that's good for America."
When liberals call for bipartisanship what they really mean is "Come on, guys, just give up everything you're asking for and do it our way because we know we're right."
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by drwizardphd
When republicans call for bipartisanship it means "you give a little, I'll give a little, and we'll work together to achieve a mutually beneficial piece of legislation that's good for America."
When liberals call for bipartisanship what they really mean is "Come on, guys, just give up everything you're asking for and do it our way because we know we're right."
Originally posted by HauntWok
So, with a majority in the House and nearly dead even in the Senate for well over a year, how come they haven't fixed a damn thing?
Congress logs most futile legislative year on record
By Stephen Dinan
The Washington Times
Sunday, January 15, 2012
It’s official: Congress ended its least-productive year in modern history after passing 80 bills — fewer than during any other session since year-end records began being kept in 1947.
Furthermore, an analysis by The Washington Times of the scope of such activities as time spent in debate, number of conference reports produced and votes taken on the House and Senate floors found that Congress set a record for legislative futility by accomplishing less in 2011 than any other year in history.