This topic is in the War On Terrorism discussion forum.  (rss)


Why are we worried about our Nuclear power plants?




Topic started on 5-10-2004 @ 12:45 PM by QuietSoul


For awhile now, the government has been hootin and hollering about a potential terrorist attack on our nuke plants..



poststuff2.entensity.net...

After watching this video, I honestly don't see why they think it's a problem.

This plane smashing into a concrete wall designed to protect our nuclear materials.. its going 500mph and gets vaporized...

More scare tactics from our government?

Or is there a signifigant difference with a F4 Phanton jet and a 757?

(awesome video btw)

[edit on 10/5/2004 by QuietSoul]



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2004 @ 12:50 PM by Gazrok


I don't think they're worried about a plane crash tactic...moreso sabatage triggering a 3 mile island style meltdown...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2004 @ 12:52 PM by Nygdan


Considering that chernobyl was blown apart because of steam pressure, I think everyone should be worried about this. Surely explosives of sufficient power can blast thru these defense walls. And is every plant reinforced in this way?



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2004 @ 12:55 PM by QuietSoul



The Nuclear Regulatory Commission sent a confidential memo to power plants nationwide last week warning of plans for a terrorist attack in which hijackers are to "fly a commercial aircraft into a nuclear power plant." If fighter jets intervene, the plan calls for terrorists to divert the "mission to any tall building."


www.cnn.com...

Perhaps the government isnt worried about it, but the NRC is?

Just seems a little premature and poorly thought out warning



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2004 @ 01:01 PM by chaosrain


See my post in this thread:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Page 1, I do the calculations to compare the force of an F-4 (pictured) to that of a 757. It doesn't look promising...an F-4 has significantly less mass than a 757.



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2004 @ 01:05 PM by evecasino


I live about 3 miles from the Oyster Creek NP in New Jersey and for awhile they had Army guards stationed at all the entrances to the plant.

I don't know why they would waste the taxpayers money when this is one of the plants that very well could suffer from a terrorist attack by air.


www.app.com...



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 


reply posted on 5-10-2004 @ 01:47 PM by Gazrok



The Nuclear Regulatory Commission sent a confidential memo to power plants nationwide last week warning of plans for a terrorist attack in which hijackers are to "fly a commercial aircraft into a nuclear power plant." If fighter jets intervene, the plan calls for terrorists to divert the "mission to any tall building."


Granted then, such a threat is pretty unlikely to manifest....



reply to this post:   copyright & usage 










Top Topics Right Now:



Active Topics Right Now:



ATS MIX Podcasts:











Newest Topics:


























ATS Server: www4.theabovenetwork.com
Powered by AboveTop:Board v2.3
Header data processed in 0.002 seconds
Page processed in 0.074 seconds
6 total database queries (1)









The Above Top Secret Conspiracy Community Web site is a wholly owned social content community of The Above Network, LLC.





thread