posted on Jun, 20 2012 @ 12:39 AM
Originally posted by 911files
Originally posted by Wonderer2012His argument is beyond ridiculous when it has been revealed that he and many other FBI agents were told
to back off from investigating Saudi nationals, even though Al Qaeda is funded heavily from within Saudi Arabia. But that is nothing to be concerned
Are you familiar with Zakat? Perhaps you are aware that it is one of the 5 Pillars of Islam. As it turns
out, Saudi Arabia is filthy rich and they support through Zakat a lot of things. A lot of that money was channeled off for bad things (some
intentionally, some not so much). You really do need to study Islam and the Saudi's role in it.
You are ignoring the fact that your blatant shill partner in this thread said that John O'Neill was, and let's quote-
He was forced out after investigations into his conduct as a FBI employee which prevented his promotion into a post at the National Security Council
and in addition to this he also had massive personal debts and was having several affairs all of this led to him eventually leaving the FBI. By all
accounts he was very difficult to work with, he was in massive debts and required a more lucrative job to facilitate his retirement, a Job at the
trade centre would have suited him just fine.
So O'Neill was 'forced out' of the FBI, had 'massive debts', was 'very difficult to work with' and was having 'several affairs'.
Surely the biggest conspiracy of all time is that a man of this nature would have been given the head of security job at the WTC!
Unless of course, (and is far more likely), John O'Neill was VERY good at his job, hence he was getting close to the truth about Bin Laden and his
funders and it was decided to offer him the very lucrative WTC job in order to kill him off and prevent him from speaking out post 9/11.