It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Texas Rep. Ron Paul acknowledged in a message to supporters Wednesday evening that he will not end up with enough delegates to win the Republican presidential nomination -- an obvious statement that may still come as a disappointment to the congressman's hard-core supporters.
Paul urged his backers to use the Republican National Convention in Tampa as an opportunity to advocate for their policy priorities, and pointed to several down-ballot races where like-minded candidates could use support.
(Also on POLITICO: The 25 best quotes from Ron Paul’s 2012 campaign)
"When it is all said and done, we will likely have as many as 500 supporters as delegates on the Convention floor. That is just over 20 percent! And while this total is not enough to win the nomination, it puts us in a tremendous position to grow our movement and shape the future of the GOP!" Paul said in the message. "There are many issues to fight for in Tampa. Also, candidates like Justin Amash, Kurt Bills, and Thomas Massie need your support as we move into the fall."
"And while this total is not enough to win the nomination, it puts us in a tremendous position to grow our movement and shape the future of the GOP"
(on Ron Paul) "he's been nothing but an asset to the Republican party. He's brought alot of youthful enthusiasm, alot of indepedents, alot of people who have become disgruntled with the Republican party:
Originally posted by Southern Guardian
reply to post by satron
Well atleast you're voting Satron. You're better than those who insist they 'won't be voting' because they're disgruntled. I think the worse thing you can do is not vote, if don't vote in my opinion you have no real legitimate reason to complain. I'm writing in Kucinich, what are the chances of him getting in? It's about the principal I guess.
Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to post by Southern Guardian
I personally couldn't care less about "disgruntlement" - if I don't have anyone WORTH voting for, I'm not going to bother.
Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to post by Southern Guardian
I personally couldn't care less about "disgruntlement" - if I don't have anyone WORTH voting for, I'm not going to bother.
Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to post by satron
Oh, don't mistake me - if I have someone worth voting for, I will still vote. I'll have to see who all makes the ballot here in Oklahoma, but I am giving Johnson a strong look and will also consider others who might be available.
Originally posted by Praetorius
reply to post by satron
I can sympathize with the view. I have to push it a bit further, though, and lament the lack of serious self-education and involvement in the early election cycle and the pirmaries and caucuses, myself - these are the deciding races to help us prevent the douche/turd split, and due to low involvement at that point leaving most of the voting and selection to be done by party regulars who typically support establishment candidates, well...
Granted, if there IS an option in the general election worth supporting (or a protest vote one can motivate to make), well and good...but we sadly rarely end up with those good options who remain viable due to the abysmal levels of participation early in the game.
“What's more, we will send several hundred additional supporters to Tampa who, while bound to Romney