It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
LOS ANGELES (AP) – Years of ferocious storms have threatened to gnaw away the western tip of a popular beachfront park two hours drive north of Los Angeles. Instead of building a 500-foot-long wooden defense next to the pier to tame the tide, the latest thinking is to flee.
But after futile attempts to curb coastal erosion — a problem expected to grow worse with rising seas fueled by global warming — there is growing acknowledgment that the sea is relentless and any line drawn in the sand is likely to eventually wash over.
In the U.S., the starkest example can be found in Alaska, where entire villages have been forced to move to higher ground or are thinking about it in the face of melting sea ice. Hawaii's famous beaches are slowly shrinking and some scientists think it's a matter of time before the state has to explore whether to move back development.
Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
reply to post by SUICIDEHK45
Interesting, but there is only a certain amount of frozen water on the planet. If there is enough to raise the oceans 70cm, then that's basically the limit, it doesn't matter whether that is in 5 years or 40 years. You ain't getting more water than there is.
On the global warming, I would agree, the planet is heating up. I attribute this to higher thermal conductivity due to an increase in the number of molecules per cubic meter in space (you know the way a thermos works right). Entering a galactic arm will do that as has been commented on a number of times by NASA. Of course I don't know how trustworthy they are, but I know governments are not. So if the answer to fixing the global warming problem is some government solution involving taxes or Cap and Trade, we can forget that, it's not going to help. Nothing was ever fixed by increasing taxes.
The world has gone through this many many times. If civilization is doomed to repeat the past cycles of the earth in which case we might be doomed, so be it. Everything has its time and civilizations fall.
But cheer up, the worst is yet to come.
Cheers - Dave
Originally posted by Trillium
Originally posted by bobs_uruncle
reply to post by SUICIDEHK45
Interesting, but there is only a certain amount of frozen water on the planet. If there is enough to raise the oceans 70cm, then that's basically the limit, it doesn't matter whether that is in 5 years or 40 years. You ain't getting more water than there is.
On the global warming, I would agree, the planet is heating up. I attribute this to higher thermal conductivity due to an increase in the number of molecules per cubic meter in space (you know the way a thermos works right). Entering a galactic arm will do that as has been commented on a number of times by NASA. Of course I don't know how trustworthy they are, but I know governments are not. So if the answer to fixing the global warming problem is some government solution involving taxes or Cap and Trade, we can forget that, it's not going to help. Nothing was ever fixed by increasing taxes.
The world has gone through this many many times. If civilization is doomed to repeat the past cycles of the earth in which case we might be doomed, so be it. Everything has its time and civilizations fall.
But cheer up, the worst is yet to come.
Cheers - Dave
Me think your number are a bit off Here
The main ice covered landmass is Antarctica at the South Pole, with about 90 percent of the world's ice (and 70 percent of its fresh water). Antarctica is covered with ice an average of 2,133 meters (7,000 feet) thick. If all of the Antarctic ice melted, sea levels around the world would rise about 61 meters (200 feet).
www.wunderground.com...
science.howstuffworks.com...
www.giss.nasa.gov...
edit on 2-6-2012 by Trillium because: (no reason given)edit on 2-6-2012 by Trillium because: (no reason given)