It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Obama vetoed Assad assassination attempt

page: 1
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 05:52 AM
link   
A plot to assassinate foreign leader of Syria Bashar al-Assad by Saudi and French governments. In other words NATO was vetoed by Obama. rt.com...

Reports confirm Israel, Saudi Arabia and French governments plotted to assassinate Assad.

Obama confirmed he is not interested in MORE WAR.

Obama vetoes WW3

Snippet from Article

New reports filed this week suggest that the an attempt to assassinate Syrian President Bashar al-Assad orchestrated by French and Saudi governments was recently abandoned after US President Barack Obama refused to involve America in the attack.

edit on 1-6-2012 by BlueStatePatriot because: (no reason given)

edit on Fri Jun 1 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: title edit to reflect source

edit on Fri Jun 1 2012 by DontTreadOnMe because: IMPORTANT: Using Content From Other Websites on ATS




posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 05:56 AM
link   
reread

edit on 1-6-2012 by wewillnotcomply666 because: mistake



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 05:57 AM
link   
reply to post by BlueStatePatriot
 


Sooner or later, you're going to have to smarten up and stop posting crap like this.

No links to corroborate what you're saying.

This isn't DailyKos or even BTS!

If Obama does something, either put a link into your post or I will personally report you for wasting time on here.



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 05:57 AM
link   
reply to post by wewillnotcomply666
 


Look above at my post and you will see what is called a link. Hover your mouse over it and when your mouse if over the link I posted click it. Then your IE will take you to the source.



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 05:58 AM
link   
rt.com... obama vetoed assad assasination attempt, not ww3



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 05:58 AM
link   
reply to post by BlueStatePatriot
 


Do not believe the lies people
The Syrian government is not behind what the west is claiming, certainly no legitimate evidence has been shown to back up these claims.



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 05:59 AM
link   

Originally posted by BlueStatePatriot
reply to post by wewillnotcomply666
 


Look above at my post and you will see what is called a link. Hover your mouse over it and when your mouse if over the link I posted click it. Then your IE will take you to the source.



sorry mated already edited above posted noticed almost straight after lol. sorry again



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 05:59 AM
link   
reply to post by BlueStatePatriot
 


That's not how it works.

You're supposed to post a link WITH a preview of the content of that link.

Did you read the TOC?



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 06:00 AM
link   
reply to post by BlueStatePatriot
 


Yup Obama has proven himself!! Congratulations!! Oh! You know what we should do?? How about.. we give him another term!!


Pack your bags, this country is headed for hell. Arrival is soon. I f-*kin mean it.



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 06:01 AM
link   
interesting ?

Days earlier, the US was linked to a shipment of anti-tank missiles believed to be sent to anti-Assad rebels in Syria



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 06:01 AM
link   
I don’t make a habit of believing Russian propaganda and I am not going to start now.

If the French wanted to they could probably assassinate the Syrian leader without the help of the Americans and it is highly unlikely that the Saudis would ever conceder such a move anyway even if relations are strained.



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 06:02 AM
link   
reply to post by Mizzijr
 


Or we could ask the Romney-bots exactly what Willard would do once they elected him.

Oh wait, these elections are pre-determined!

Your new president is a Garthok!


America, prepare to narfle the Garthok!!!!!



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 06:08 AM
link   
Fact check:

Alex Jones even uses Russia TV as a news source for his stories.

Alex Jones appears on Russia TV frequently to discuss issues.



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 06:10 AM
link   
reply to post by BlueStatePatriot
 





Fact check:

Alex Jones even uses Russia TV as a news source for his stories.

Alex Jones appears on Russia TV frequently to discuss issues.

Just want to check, you do realise that makes Rt less reliable and not more reliable right?



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 06:11 AM
link   
reply to post by BlueStatePatriot
 


Alex, is that you?

What's the frequency, Alex?



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 06:15 AM
link   
It doesn;t matter what facts I post what links I post what truth I post if you disagree with it or you refuse to accept the truth that I post you will back out of the debate and you will only try to say that the link or source is not credible.

If the facts upset you that does not mean that the source is not credible.



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 06:16 AM
link   
reply to post by BlueStatePatriot
 


Then do tell, what are the facts?



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 06:26 AM
link   

Originally posted by OtherSideOfTheCoin
reply to post by BlueStatePatriot
 





Fact check:

Alex Jones even uses Russia TV as a news source for his stories.

Alex Jones appears on Russia TV frequently to discuss issues.

Just want to check, you do realise that makes Rt less reliable and not more reliable right?


What kind of proof do you have that Rt is less reliable?

So when will the story Obama defends Syrian president appear on FOX?



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 06:29 AM
link   
reply to post by buster2010
 


Ohh come on its just a massive propaganda machine for Russia, people on ATS love it because its “MSN” that backs up a lot of what they say and they can use it as a “reliable” source. The truth is that Rt has anti-America and anti-West agenda and it’s just as bias as all other media outlets.

For such a group of supposedly intelligent people there is a distinctly lacking ability from members of ATS to critically appraise their sources.



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 06:32 AM
link   
reply to post by The Sword
 


Ok I included a part of the article in my post.

Now why don't you talk about the issue in the article or the content.



new topics

top topics



 
3
<<   2 >>

log in

join