new bigfoot video

page: 1
5

log in

join

posted on May, 31 2012 @ 06:17 PM
link   
so today when i opened yahoo there was a new bigfoot sighting video. so i checked it out quality is kinda bad so i cant really come to any senses about it so ill post the link and let you guys see for yourself and discuss about it.
[sorry if this is already one here]

bigfoot
edit on 31-5-2012 by ConfusedPeasant because: sorry:>




posted on May, 31 2012 @ 06:19 PM
link   
Link is broken
edit on 31-5-2012 by BelowPublicKnowledge because: (no reason given)


Watched the video though seems kinda of legit. But you never know, the mind can be deceived very easily.
edit on 31-5-2012 by BelowPublicKnowledge because: (no reason given)


edit on 31-5-2012 by BelowPublicKnowledge because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 06:20 PM
link   
your link died a slow horrible and painful death. colonel gadhaffi would be proud.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 06:22 PM
link   
Click edit and delete http:// in your link. It is doubled.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 06:23 PM
link   
HI!, im confusedpeasant, and my links suck



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 06:23 PM
link   

Originally posted by ConfusedPeasant
so today when i opened yahoo there was a new bigfoot sighting video. so i checked it out quality is kinda bad so i cant really come to any senses about it so ill post the link and let you guys see for yourself and discuss about it.
[sorry if this is already one here]

bigfoot



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 06:42 PM
link   
Interesting that the story very briefly mentions that, following the filming of the black figure, students climbed the ridge. there they found footprints and took plaster castings. Is this story more legitimate, that it is actually at once two evidences of a bigfoot sighting?



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 06:42 PM
link   
reply to post by Idonthaveabeard
 


Works for me ! Did you try clicking on the word Bigfoot ?
edit on 31-5-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 06:43 PM
link   
Interesting, but I think it's just another one to add to the "maybe" pile.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 06:51 PM
link   
reply to post by randyvs
 


Its cos hes fixed it now, before it was broke



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:23 PM
link   
Hmmm..Im not saying i think its fake but, the professor IS a big foot specialist? The print was darn near perfect, Not sayin it was faked but thats a heck of a coincidence. I kinda hope we dont find a bigfoot if they are real because like everything else,,we destroy it.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 07:42 PM
link   
Is it just me that sees # all in that video??



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 09:19 PM
link   
reply to post by ConfusedPeasant
 


Maybe it's just the quality of the film, but the picture of the print looks like it was taken in snow or sand. The edges are very rounded so getting such a good cast in a sandy medium is fairly difficult. What kind of project were they doing to have casting material with them? It isn't something you by at Wal-Mart.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 10:36 PM
link   
reply to post by ConfusedPeasant
 


Very interesting video. It always bugs me that all we usually get to see is a glimpse. Thanks for posting this.



posted on May, 31 2012 @ 10:51 PM
link   
The video looks fairly convincing, to me. The photo of the footprint in the snow looked real to me. The student did not seem to be a hoaxer type.

If this is the real deal, going to the site where the Bigfoot was videotaped, and finding the footprint, adds credibility to the account.

I just watched a Monster Quest episode today, pertaining to Bigfoot. It was from around 2007. There were two experts in computer enhancing viideos. It was fairly complex, what they were doing. They broke down the Patterson film from back in the 60's, and they could see the eyelids of the animal moving. The conclusion was, it was not someone in a suit.

They intervied the other man that was with Patterson when they saw the Bigfoot. I think his last name is Gimblin.
I watched his eyes during the interview, and his eyes showed no sign of deception. The eyes are the window to the soul, and they can tell a lot about a person. I just got the feeling he was telling the truth.

I have never seen a Bigfoot, but back in the 70's, I heard a loud roar, that at that time, I did not equate it to a Bigfoot. After reading about them, and hearing recordings, and people's description of what they heard, I feel I may have heard a Bigfoot.

During that time, there were many sightings of Bigfoot in the area I live, which is Western NC. There was a footprint of one, found a few years ago, a few miles from where I live. I live within a few miles of a 10,000 acre State Park, and even the privately owned land, is mostly wooded, with small creeks, and a few larger rivers.

Bigfoot is a mystery, and it may always be. All the people saying they have seen one, can't all be crazy. A map of all the reported Bigfoot sightings in the US, are all in areas of woodland, and water. if people are making all this up, why are there never a report of Bigfoot, in the wide open Plains, where there is no cover? I think the reason is, people are reporting what they actually saw, and 99% of the time, it is in wooded areas.

Thanks for the post.



posted on Jun, 1 2012 @ 09:32 AM
link   
This is also new from MK Davis bigfoot searcher at "bigfoot evidence" it shows a small bigfoot climb a tree

and shake the limbs. Pretty cool. bigfootevidence.blogspot.com...



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 11:47 AM
link   
reply to post by ConfusedPeasant
 


Video not avaliable in your location



posted on Jun, 7 2012 @ 11:48 AM
link   
reply to post by RUFFREADY
 


Your video is pretty good it could merit a post of its own





new topics

top topics



 
5

log in

join