It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Shadowhawk
There is documentation (declassified accident report) and there is physical evidence at the crash site. These prove conclusively that the airplane was an F-117A.
Originally posted by thebozeian
However I am skeptical about some of the numbers you mentioned. I highly doubt that friction ignition would be occurring at around Mach 1 as you just dont have enough of a temperature spike at that speed from friction to see auto ignition. There is nothing wrong with the theory just the speed involved. No standard Jet A1/JP type fuel would ignite at those low temps. The only way to do it would be to produce special low ignition point fuels, but the problem with these is that they would be inherently highly dangerous. Not saying it is not possible but maybe not practical. Most likely is that either you or your friend had the numbers confused. Maybe you could clarify this with them?
LEE.
Originally posted by Shadowhawk
That sounds like the second X-47B being transported to Patuxent River, MD, for testing. The first one generated all sorts of witness reports of a "UFO wrapped in plastic on a flatbed truck." Northrop Grumman officials knew that removing the wings for transport would make it look like a flying saucer, so they made sure to leave the landing gear down so people would see that it was just an airplane.
Also, the airplane that crashed near Bakersfield, CA, in July 1986 was most definitely a Lockheed F-117A and not any sort of "pumpkinseed" or other mythical aircraft. Witnesses seeing the black airplane against the pitch black sky did not have a clear view of it before it crashed since the accident happened several hours before dawn. The accident report has long since been declassified, and there is ample physical evidence at the scene to confirm the aircraft's identity as an F-117A.