So why are we voting Bush again?, page 1


Pages:
ATS Members have flagged this thread 0 times


reply posted on 30-9-2004 @ 09:34 AM by jrsdls
funny you should mention globalization because that's what Kerry wants to do with the U.S. military, After all he claims that he is and "internationalist."

As Far as your number of reason's

1. This was the fund that Clinton used to build that so called surplus. Social Security needs to be overhauled. It is nothing more than a ponzi scheme anyway. I like the President's idea of letting the younger people take some of thier money they pay into the system and let them invest it where they want.

2. reduce Veterans benefits, this started under Clinton, not Bush. No President has reduced military pay. I know I am a veteran and I can tell you that I have never had a pay reduction. this is a falsehood on your part.

3. Oil prices have been going up for a long time, not under Bush. Think about it, do you honest want to Blame Bush for this? that's like blaming him for the Hurricanes.

4. Giving businesses tax cuts, This happens in every adminstration and in every town in America. You can't tell me that the town you live in does not have a business that gets a special break in taxes just to build there.

5. again, here you can say the same thing about the Clinton Adminstration

6. 45,000 Americans lose thier live a year on American's Highways. Are you protesting Detroit and the car makers for the deadly cars that they make? Highly questional war, President Bush put are troops in harms way because it had to be done in order to get Saddam out and help establish freedom. Clinton just lobbed billion dollar cruise missiles at him.

7. See number 1, also remember Clinton's economist have just came out and said that the recession started under Clinton, and do really know what 9-11 cost us financially? Blame the terrorist for that not Bush.


reply posted on 30-9-2004 @ 09:35 AM by TrueLies
Originally posted by TenaciousGuy
Voting for Nadar is almost the smae as not voting, he always holds 3 percent and always runs. I don't know why people vote for him, is it just because they don't like the two main canidates? I just don't get why someone would throw their vote away. I don't like either canidate either, but I'm goin to vote for the lesser of the two eveils because no one else has a chance of winning. But that's just me, if someone could elaborate as to why I should vote for nadar, I would be open minded.


Wow, your going to vote the lesser of two evils?? Why even vote at all then? Imo, your wasting your vote. If you think Nader is a wated vote, try looking in the mirror, this guy appears to be voting his conscience, while you are voting on a false pretense. If your not voting your conscience, your wasting your vote. I'm sorry dude, but the propaganda machine has gotten to your head. Isn't voting your conscience a more American thing to do, a more patriotic thing to do, a more SMART thing to do?? I don't see how voting lesser of two evils is voting your beliefs or ideas, imo they are one in the same. So a third party is always more fitting, when are people going to get this?
I'm voting libertarian this year, kerry and bush can lick my crack.
Badnarik says: "if you vote the leser of two evil's you still get evil" & "if you don't vote for liberty now, you'll never get it" Restore the republic, quit enabling the two biggest republic destroyers. Their the reason why this country is in such a mess.


reply posted on 30-9-2004 @ 09:50 AM by curme
Originally posted by jrsdls
f

2. reduce Veterans benefits, this started under Clinton, not Bush. No President has reduced military pay. I know I am a veteran and I can tell you that I have never had a pay reduction. this is a falsehood on your part.



Bush tried:
Army Times - after he sent the troops to Iraq, to pay for his tax cuts, but flip-flopped when his poll numbers went down.

Veteran's benefit's? My friend in Jersey (who got cancer in the Army) just got hers cut a couple of weeks ago, well, she got her a two-month notice. Why were her benefits cut? The Bush administration wants to cut $844 million from veterans’ health care. Not only does this include closing down VA hospitals, but what about the mental, as well as physical, care that soldiers will need coming back from Afghanistan and Iraq?


reply posted on 30-9-2004 @ 12:15 PM by jrsdls
funny, I according to the congress, President Bush has increased benefits.

------


– Rep. Rob Simmons, 2nd-District, joined President Bush at an Oval Office ceremony for the signing into law of H.R. 2297, the “Veterans Benefits Act of 2003.” H.R. 2297 authorizes $1 billion over the next ten years for new and expanded benefits for disabled veterans, surviving spouses, and their children.

“Today’s action by President Bush provides much-needed expanded benefits for our nation’s disabled vets and their loved ones,” Simmons said. “I am proud that Congress and the Bush Administration have moved in a bipartisan fashion to provide for our comrades-in-arms and their surviving family members.”

Among its many provisions, the new law will:

· Allows VA to provide specially adapted housing grant to severely disabled servicemembers prior to their separation from active duty service.

· Increases the specially adapted automobile grant from $9,000 to $11,000, and increase the specially adapted housing grants from $48,000 to $50,000 for the most severely disabled veterans and from $9,250 to $10,000 for less severely disabled veterans.

· Restores dependency and indemnity compensation (DIC), home loan, education, and burial benefit eligibility for spouses remarried after age 57.

· Increases monthly educational benefits for spouses and dependent children of disabled veterans from $695 to $788 for full-time study, from $522 to $592 for three-quarter time study, and from $347 to $394 for half-time study.

· Expands benefits eligibility to children with spina bifida who were born to certain Vietnam-era veterans who served in Korea near the demilitarized zone.

· Allows the surviving spouse or dependent children to receive the full amount of accrued benefits if the veteran dies while their claim is still pending.

· Eliminates the 30-day requirement for POWs to qualify for presumptions of service-connection for certain disabilities: psychosis, any of the anxiety states, dysthymic disorder, organic residuals of frostbite, and post-traumatic osteoarthritis.

· Provides full compensation and DIC to members of the new Philippine Scouts if the individual resides in the United States as a citizen or permanent resident. Also extends eligibility for burial in a national cemetery.

· Expands the Montgomery GI Bill program to cover self-employment training programs of less than six months and entrepreneurship courses at approved institutions.

· Allows federal agencies to create “sole-source” contracts for disabled veteran-owned small businesses – up to $5 million for manufacturing contract awards and up to $3 million for non-manufacturing contract awards.

· Allows federal agencies to restrict certain contracts to disabled veteran-owned small businesses if at least two such concerns are qualified to bid on the contract.

· Mandates that the U.S. Dept. of Labor place staff in veterans’ assistance offices at overseas military installations.

Simmons concluded, “As a Vietnam Veteran and Chairman of the VA Health Subcommittee, I am committed to helping our disabled veterans and their families. Rest assured, I will always fight to ‘keep the promise’ to our vets.”


www.house.gov...
Pages:     ^^TOP^^



Australian schoolyard bullies to face job ban
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
No Indians or Asians job ad triggers outrage in Australia
  Posted 14 days ago with 4 member flags
Iran and the USA
  Posted 1 days ago with 2 member flags
Biden To Skip Tampa: Latest
  Posted 17 days ago with 1 member flags
Three axed ministers CRIED
  Posted 5 days ago with 1 member flags
Asia should have its own Facebook, Twitter: China official
  Posted 6 days ago with 0 member flags
Australia moves to buy $3b spy drone fleet
  Posted 2 days ago with 0 member flags